The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Å ta empirien på alvor v.2.0.
Open accessAbstract
I denne artikkelen drøftes status og utfordringer vedrørende grunnlagstenkningen for kunnskap og vitenskap innen systemisk praksis. Bakgrunnen er en bekymring for at vårt fagfelt i hovedsak er inspirert av teorier hentet fra ideologi og filosofi på bekostning av eksisterende empiri. Vi drøfter mulige årsaker til en slik skjevhet, som har blitt ekstra tydelig i de senere års akademisering av familieterapifeltet, noe som innebærer høyere krav til vitenskapelige kunnskapsreferanser. Artikkelen påpeker at deler av fagfeltet har en preferanse for kunnskap fra kvalitative studier framfor kvantitative. Dette problematiseres, dels begrunnet med metodelæren, dels ut fra den skjevhet dette innebærer for kunnskapstilførsel til studenter og systemiske praktikere. Følgen av en slik preferanse kan være at den systemiske praktiker mangler vesentlig kunnskap, det stimuleres ikke til å gjennomføre eller delta i kvantitative studier, og en risikerer at faget sett utenfra ikke blir tatt på alvor. Dette problemet aktualiserer et skjerpet fokus på fagfeltets grunnlagstenkning og sentrale politiske, etiske og faglige føringer. Som svar på dette presenterer artikkelen interaktiv konstruktivisme og kritisk realisme og foreslår disse som det styrende paradigmet for systemisk praksis. Vi argumenterer for at dette kan fjerne en ideologisk begrunnet dikotomi mellom typer kunnskap og forskningsdesign og redusere avstanden mellom forsker og kliniker.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Dallos and Urry (1999) suggest a third-order cybernetic shift, which in our opinion resembles a research paradigm from critical realism (Pocock, 2015;Tilden et al., 2022) with its critical examination of society's impact on families.”
From Researching what we practice—The paradigm of systemic family research: Part 2 (2023) · cites this paper as Tilden et al., 2022
Citations
Cites
Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves
DAVIES, B., & HARRÉ, R. (1990) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x · Cited by 5,357
The Social Construction of What?
Dupré, J., & Hacking, I. (2000) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2678463 · Cited by 3,443
Bergin and Garfield's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change
Lambert, M. J. (2003) · Cited by 3,383
Evidence-based practice in psychology.
American Psychological Association (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.4.271 · Cited by 2,478
Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life
Sayer, A. (2011) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511734779 · Cited by 929
Family Therapy: A Systemic Integration
Becvar, D. S., & Becvar, R. J. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 616
Psychotherapy relationships that work III.
Norcross, J. C., & Lambert, M. J. (2018) · Psychotherapy · doi:10.1037/pst0000193 · Cited by 578
Anker, M. G., Duncan, B. L., & Sparks, J. A. (2009) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016062 · Cited by 375
Metatheory, Interdisciplinarity and Disability Research: A Critical Realist Perspective
Bhaskar, R., & Danermark, B. (2006) · Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research · doi:10.1080/15017410600914329 · Cited by 343
TOWARD PROGRESS RESEARCH: CLOSING THE GAP BETWEEN FAMILY THERAPY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH
Pinsof, W. M., & Wynne, L. C. (2000) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2000.tb00270.x · Cited by 218
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Anderson, H. (2019). Samarbeidende dialogisk praksis. I L. Lorås & O. Ness (Red.), Håndbok i familieterapi (s. 199–212). Fagbokforlaget.
- Friedlander, M.L., Heatherington, L. & Diamond, G.M. (2021). Systemic and conjoint couple and family therapies: Recent advances and future promise. I M. Barkham, W. Lutz. & L.G. Castonguay (Red.), Bergin and Garfield's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change, 7. utg. (s. 539–581). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- Gilje, N. & Grimen, H. (1993). Samfunnsvitenskapens forutsetninger. Innføring i samfunnsvitenskapens vitenskapsfilosofi. Universitetsforlaget.
- Glasersfeld, E. von (1995). Radical constructivism. A way of knowing and learning. Routledge.
- Lock, A. & Strong, T. (2014). Sosialkontruksjonisme. Teorier og tradisjoner. Fagbokforlaget.
- Norsk Psykologforening (2007). Prinsipperklæring om evidensbasert psykologisk praksis. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 44(9), 1127–1128.
- Nortvedt, M.W., Jamtvedt, G., Graverholt, B., Nordheim, L.V. & Reinar, L.M. (2012). Jobb kunnskapsbasert. En arbeidsbok. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
- Orlinsky, D.E. (2014) Varieties of psychotherapies and psychotherapists. Levels of commonality and specificity in the ‘Generic Model of Psychotherapy’. I A.v.d. Lippe, H.A. Nissen-Lie, & H.W. Oddli (Red.), Psykoterapeuten. En antologi om terapeutens rolle i psykoterapi (s. 22–50). Gyldendal Akademisk.
- 10.1037/0000055-000 · DOI
- Solem, M.-B. (2011). Parenting Stress and Coping Practices. A Salutogenic Approach. Doktorgradsavhandling, Psykologisk institutt, Universitetet i Oslo.
- Stokkebekk J. (2022). Navigating Prolonged Conflict: Subject positions and meaning constructions in postdivorce families . UIB. Ph.d.-avhanding. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2996343
- Tilden, T. & Ulvenes, P.G. (2021). Bruk av tilbakemeldingssystem. I P.-E. Binder, L. Lorås, og F. Thuen (Red.), Håndbok i individualterapi (s. 73–88). Fagbokforlaget.
- Tilden, T. & Vrabel, K.A. (2021). Fellesfaktorer i psykoterapi. I P.-E. Binder, L. Lorås & F. Thuen (Red.), Håndbok i individualterapi (s. 89–103). Fagbokforlaget.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Researching what we practice—The paradigm of systemic family research: Part 1
Lorås, L., Whittaker, K. J., Stokkebekk, J., & Tilden, T. (2023) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/famp.12903 · Cited by 13
Self-citationResearching what we practice—The paradigm of systemic family research: Part 2
Whittaker, K., Stokkebekk, J., Lorås, L., & Tilden, T. (2023) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/famp.12921 · Cited by 12
Self-citationWhittaker, K. J., Johnson, S. U., Solbakken, O. A., Wampold, B. E., & Tilden, T. (2021) · Couple and Family Psychology Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/cfp0000181 · Cited by 10
Self-citationTaking empirical evidence seriously v.2.01
Tilden, T., Solem, M., Thuen, F., Lorås, L., Stokkebekk, J., & Whittaker, K. J. (2024) · Journal of Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/1467-6427.12448 · Cited by 7
Self-citationSvar til Åse Holmberg og Rolf Sundets kommentar i Fokus 3/22
Tilden, T. (2022) · Fokus på familien · doi:10.18261/fokus.50.4.7 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tilden, T., Solem, M.-B., Thuen, F., Lorås, L., Stokkebekk, J., & Whittaker, K.
- Affiliations
- Forskningsinstituttet, Modum Bad
- OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
- Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO)
- seniorrådgiver, spisskompetansemiljø for vold og høykonflikt, Bufetat, region øst
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Venue
- Fokus på familien
- Publisher
- Scandinavian University Press
- Published
- 2022-12-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 315-333
- ISSN
- 0332-5415 (ISSN-L)
- 0807-7487
- OpenAlex
- W4311633654
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- no
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Fokus på familien (publishedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Keywords
- systemic practice, family therapy, empirical evidence, qualitative versus quantitative research, academicization, research paradigms, critical realism, research-practice relationship, science and ideology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
