The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Conceptualising Judicial Independence and Accountability from a Regulatory Perspective
Open accessAbstract
This article builds on a comparative study of judicial conduct regulation regimes in India and the United Kingdom. It critically assesses judicial independence and accountability from a regulatory perspective. The article argues that judicial independence and accountability have three essential dimensions: individual, internal and institutional. Therefore, the legal frameworks that set up and support regulatory regimes must adequately emphasise all three dimensions. However, the legal frameworks in India and the UK mostly focus on institutional independence, underemphasising individual independence in the process, while internal judicial independence has been a vanishing point of jurisprudence in both jurisdictions. Similarly, there are notable gaps in the accountability frameworks of both countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Huchhanavar, S. S.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Huchhanavar, Shivaraj S
- Venue
- Oslo Law Review
- Publisher
- Scandinavian University Press
- Published
- 2023-04-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 110-148
- ISSN
- 2387-3299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4362559617
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 13.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Oslo Law Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
- Social Sciences › Law › Administrative Law and Governance
- Keywords
- judicial independence, judicial accountability, regulatory regimes, India, United Kingdom, comparative law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptualising Judicial Independence and Accountability from a Regulatory Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18261/olr.9.2.3
- The paper
- Huchhanavar, S. S. (2023). Conceptualising Judicial Independence and Accountability from a Regulatory Perspective. Oslo Law Review. https://doi.org/10.18261/olr.9.2.3
