Cited by 22Linguistics and Language AnalysisLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Speech Acts in EFL Classrooms

Open access
Christianto, Danin·2020·Journal of Pragmatics Research

Abstract

Speech act is a functional unit in the form of an act which helps humans understand or accomplish things with words in communication. This research was aimed to find out and analyse the types of speech acts which were performed by teachers and students in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms. The researcher employed the speech act theory from Cruse (2000) to analyse and interpret the research results. Qualitative research was applied in this research due to the data source was from the teaching and learning activities in naturalistic environments in English classrooms. The subjects of this research were teachers and students in REAL Equivalent English classrooms. The results showed that there were three types of speech acts found in the interactions between the teachers and students, namely locutionary act, illocutionary act, and perlocutionary act. Locutionary act was performed when teachers and students uttered expressions with no certain intentions. Illocutionary act, on the other hand, was performed when the expressions contained certain intentions to listeners. Perlocutionary act was performed when the listeners showed responses and acted as feedback to the speakers’ utterances. By conducting this research, the researcher hopes that it can give more insights to readers regarding to the study of speech act theory in pragmatics field. Keywords: English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Classrooms, Speech Acts, REAL Equivalent English, Teachers and Students.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18326/jopr.v2i1.68-79

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No one has comprehensively undertaken a specific study of illocutionary acts.

    “From those studies, the researchers found that no one has comprehensively undertaken a specific study of illocutionary acts.”

    From A SPEECH ACT ANALYSIS: ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS PRODUCED BY TEACHER IN ESL CLASSROOM (2023) · cites this paper as Christianto (2020)

    The Introduction reviews earlier speech-act studies, including one that examined illocutionary acts, but does not say whether any study focused specifically and comprehensively on them. Searches for the quoted claim and for a paraphrase about that research gap found no passage making it. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Altikriti, S. F. (2011). Speech act analysis to short stories. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(6), 1374-1384.
  2. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8 th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.
  3. Christianto, D. (2019). Teachers' perceptions on the use of the communicative language teaching approach in the English classrooms. International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching, 3(1), 90-101.
  4. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
  5. Cruse, D. A. (2000). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Dawson, H. C. & Phelan, M. (2016). Language files: Materials for an introduction to language and linguistics (12 th ed.). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
  7. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Fitria, T. N. (2019). An analysis of directive speech act found in "koi mil gaya" movie. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 1(2), 89-99.
  9. Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2017). An introduction to language (11 th ed.). Singapore: Cengage Learning, Inc.
  10. Jakob, J. C. (2018). Speech acts in EFL classroom at Islamic senior high school (MAN) 1 Sinjai. Journal of Language and Literature, 18(1), 20-27.
  11. Merdana, Seken, K., & Putra, N. A. J. (2013). An analysis of speech acts produced by elementary school teachers and students to facilitate teaching and learning at SDN Pringgasela East Lombok. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Indonesia, 1(43), 1-11.
  12. O'Grady, W., Dobrovolsky, M., & Aronoff, M. (1989). Contemporary linguistics: An introduction. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  13. Poole, S. C. (1999). An introduction to linguistics. New York: Palgrave.
  14. Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christianto, D.
Corresponding author
Christianto, Danin
Venue
Journal of Pragmatics Research
Published
2020-04-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
68-79
ISSN
2656-8020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3088958476
Cited by
22
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pragmatics Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
speech acts, locutionary act, illocutionary acts, perlocutionary acts, teacher-student relationship, EFL classroom, classroom interaction, pragmatics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review