Smoke-free homes: The final frontier
Open accessAbstract
Over 1.2 billion tobacco users worldwide and almost 8 million tobacco-related deaths make tobacco control a public health high priority1. While the number of smokers has fallen in high-income countries (HICs) in recent years, the number of tobacco users in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has steadily increased2. In addition to active smoking, inhalation of secondhand smoke (SHS) is a major cause of premature death and disease, especially among women and children3,4. More than one-third of women5 and half of the children6 are exposed to SHS worldwide. The exposure to SHS during pregnancy is also high in many countries; the prevalence ranging from 6% in Nigeria to 73% in Armenia7. The adverse health consequences of SHS exposure are well documented4,8-10. Exposure to SHS increases the risk of acquiring lower respiratory tract and middle-ear infections, invasive meningococcal disease, TB and incident cases, and recurrent episodes and increased severity of asthma among children10. Children living in smoking households are at risk of lower academic performance and a high rate of smoking uptake in later life11. SHS exposure during pregnancy can cause pregnancy complications, a modest reduction in birth weight, preterm delivery, stillbirths, and infant deaths10.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Private homes remain a major source of SHS exposure, particularly for women and children.
“Moreover, private homes remain a major source of SHS exposure, particularly for women and children3,460”
From Health effects associated with exposure to secondhand smoke: a Burden of Proof study (2024) · cites this paper as [460]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Öberg, M., Jaakkola, M. S., Woodward, A., Peruga, A., & Prüss-Ustün, A. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61388-8 · Cited by 1,911 · see citing works
Reitsma, M. B., Kendrick, P. J., Ababneh, E., Abbafati, C., Abbasi-Kangevari, M., Abdoli, A., Abedi, A., Abhilash, E. S., Abila, D. B., Aboyans, V., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01169-7 · Cited by 1,759 · see citing works
Zhou, Y. H., Mak, Y. W., & Ho, G. W. K. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16010107 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- [3]Wipfil H Avila-Tang E Navas-Acien A Secondhand Smoke Exposure Among Women and Children: Evidence From 31 Countries Am J Public Health 2008 98 4 672 679 10.2105/AJPH.2007.126631 18309121 PMC2376995 · DOI
- [4]Siddiqi K Huque R Kanaan M Children Learning About Secondhand Smoke (CLASS II): A Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Nicotine Tob Res 2019 21 5 670 677 10.1093/ntr/nty090 29771390 PMC6468126 · DOI
- [7]Reece S Morgan C Parascandola M Secondhand smoke exposure during pregnancy: a cross-sectional analysis of data from Demographic and Health Survey from 30 low-income and middle-income countries Tob Control 2019 28 4 420 426 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054288 30026189 PMC10442074 · DOI
- [8]Mdege ND Fairhurst C Wang HI Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a community-based smoke-free-home intervention with or without indoor-air- quality feedback in Bangladesh (MCLASS II): a three-arm, cluster-randomised, controlled trial Lancet Glob Health 2021 9 5 e639 e650 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00040-1 33865472 PMC8064237 · DOI
- [9]Leonardi-Bee J Jere ML Britton J Exposure to parental and sibling smoking and the risk of smoking uptake in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis Thorax 2011 66 10 847 855 10.1136/thx.2010.153379 21325144 · DOI
- [10]Chen R Clifford A Lang L Is exposure to secondhand smoke associated with cognitive parameters of children and adolescents?–A systematic literature review Ann Epidemiol 2013 23 10 652 661 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.07.001 23969303 · DOI · Paper page
- [11]Leonardi-Bee J Britton J Venn A Secondhand smoke and adverse fetal outcomes in nonsmoking pregnant women: A meta-analysis Pediatrics 2011 127 4 734 741 10.1542/peds.2010-3041 21382949 · DOI
- [17]Oberg M Jaakkola M Woodward A Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke: a retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries Lancet 2011 377 9760 139 146 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61388-8 21112082 · DOI · Paper page
- [18]Shah S Kannan M Huque R Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Primary School Children: A Survey in Dhaka, Bangladesh Nicotine Tob Res 2019 21 4 416 423 10.1093/ntr/ntx248 29228385 PMC6472694 · DOI
- [20]Been JV Nurmatov UB Cox B Effect of smokefree legislation on perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet 2014 383 9928 1549 1560 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60082-9 24680633 · DOI
- [22]Jayachandran S The Roots of Gender Inequality in Developing Countries Annu Rev Econom 2015 7 63 88 10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115404 · DOI · Paper page
- [23]Baxi R Sharma M Roseby R Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children’s exposure to environmental tobacco smoke Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018 1 1 CD001746 10.1002/14651858.CD001746.pub4 29383710 PMC6491082 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Health effects associated with exposure to secondhand smoke: a Burden of Proof study
Flor, L. S., Anderson, J. A., Ahmad, N., Aravkin, A., Carr, S., Dai, X., Gil, G. F., Hay, S. I., Malloy, M. J., McLaughlin, S. A., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02743-4 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
“Moreover, private homes remain a major source of SHS exposure, particularly for women and children 3,460 , and our findings can help reinforce awareness of the adverse consequences of SHS exposure and promote adoption of voluntary restrictions in homes 461 .”
Background
- Authors
- Huque, R., & Siddiqi, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Dhaka (BD)
- University of York (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Huque, Rumana
- Venue
- Tobacco Prevention & Cessation
- Publisher
- European Publishing
- Published
- 2021-10-16
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- October
- Pages
- 1-3
- ISSN
- 2459-3087 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8519312
- OpenAlex
- W3206209499
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Tobacco Prevention & Cessation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council (MR/P008941/1, MR/M020533/1, MR/T004959/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Energy and Environment Impacts
- Keywords
- smoke-free homes, passive smoking, tobacco control, household smoking, child health, smoking during pregnancy, low- and middle-income countries, smoking-related mortality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review