How innovation commons contribute to discovering and developing new technologies
Open accessAbstract
In modern economics, the institutions surrounding the creation and development of new technologies are firms, markets and governments. We propose an alternative theory that locates the institutional origin of new technologies further back in the commons when self-organizing groups of technology enthusiasts develop effective governance rules to pool distributed information resources. The ‘innovation commons’ alleviates uncertainty around a nascent technology by pooling distributed information about uses, costs, problems and opportunities. While innovation commons are mostly temporary, because the resource itself – the information about opportunities – is only temporarily valuable, they are a further addition to the Pantheon of commons, and suggest that the institutions of the commons – and the common pool resource of information about applications of the technology – may be far more important in the study of innovation than previously thought.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Much of the early theorisation on open source derives from Ostrom's seminal work on the commons, in which sustainability is a core concept.
“In fact, much of the early theorisation on open source (e.g., Benkler, 2002) derives from Ostrom's (1990) seminal work on the commons (Allen & Potts, 2016) in which sustainability is a core concept.”
From The sustainability of open source commons (2023) · cites this paper as Allen & Potts, 2016
The paper’s discussion of commons studies (section labeled Acknowledgment in our copy; no page given) links Ostrom (1990) to studies of physical commons and describes a later extension to information and knowledge commons. It does not say that much early open-source theorisation derives from Ostrom, or that sustainability is a core concept in that lineage. The references list alone does not establish those claims. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Analysis of the Potentials of Blockchain for the Governance of Global Digital Commons
Rozas, D., Tenorio-Fornés, A., & Hassan, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2021.577680 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
The sustainability of open source commons
Curto-Millet, D., & Corsín Jiménez, A. (2023) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2022.2046516 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Allen, D. W. E., & Potts, J.
- Affiliations
- RMIT University (AU)
- Venue
- International Journal of the Commons
- Publisher
- Ubiquity Press, Ltd.
- Published
- 2016-09-30
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1035
- ISSN
- 1875-0281 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2524594727
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 22.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of the Commons (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
- Keywords
- innovation commons, commons-based peer production, technological progress, distributed information resources, governance rules, uncertainty reduction, common-pool resources, information pooling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review