Cited by 120Open Source Software InnovationsEconomic Theory and InstitutionsInnovation, Technology, and Society

How innovation commons contribute to discovering and developing new technologies

Open access
Allen, Darcy W.E., Potts, Jason·2016·International Journal of the Commons

Abstract

In modern economics, the institutions surrounding the creation and development of new technologies are firms, markets and governments. We propose an alternative theory that locates the institutional origin of new technologies further back in the commons when self-organizing groups of technology enthusiasts develop effective governance rules to pool distributed information resources. The ‘innovation commons’ alleviates uncertainty around a nascent technology by pooling distributed information about uses, costs, problems and opportunities. While innovation commons are mostly temporary, because the resource itself – the information about opportunities – is only temporarily valuable, they are a further addition to the Pantheon of commons, and suggest that the institutions of the commons – and the common pool resource of information about applications of the technology – may be far more important in the study of innovation than previously thought.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18352/ijc.644

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much of the early theorisation on open source derives from Ostrom's seminal work on the commons, in which sustainability is a core concept.

    “In fact, much of the early theorisation on open source (e.g., Benkler, 2002) derives from Ostrom's (1990) seminal work on the commons (Allen & Potts, 2016) in which sustainability is a core concept.”

    From The sustainability of open source commons (2023) · cites this paper as Allen & Potts, 2016

    The paper’s discussion of commons studies (section labeled Acknowledgment in our copy; no page given) links Ostrom (1990) to studies of physical commons and describes a later extension to information and knowledge commons. It does not say that much early open-source theorisation derives from Ostrom, or that sustainability is a core concept in that lineage. The references list alone does not establish those claims. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allen, D. W. E., & Potts, J.
Affiliations
RMIT University (AU)
Venue
International Journal of the Commons
Published
2016-09-30
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
1035
ISSN
1875-0281 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2524594727
Cited by
120
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6
FWCI
22.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of the Commons (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
Keywords
innovation commons, commons-based peer production, technological progress, distributed information resources, governance rules, uncertainty reduction, common-pool resources, information pooling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review