Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 0Islamic Thought and Society StudiesMedia, Religion, Digital CommunicationReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 89 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Dijitalleşme Çağında Şiî-İmâmî Mehdici Söylemin Yeni Bir Dine Evrilmesi Ahmedi Barış ve Nur Dini

Open access
Küçüköner, Halide Rumeysa·2025·e-Makalat Mezhep Araştırmaları Dergisi

Abstract

Bu makale, 21. yüzyılda küreselleşme ve dijitalleşmenin etkisiyle ortaya çıkan Ahmedi Barış ve Nur Dini’ni ele almaktadır. Hareket kökenini İmâmiyye Şîası’ndan almasına rağmen zamanla geleneksel sınırları aşarak kendisini “yeni bir din” olarak tanımlamıştır. Bu yönüyle, İslam içi bir mezhepten çok din sosyolojisinin tanımladığı New Religious Movement/Yeni Dini Hareket kategorisine daha yakındır. Ahmedi Barış ve Nur Dini’nin temel esası, İmâmiyye Şîası’nın gaybet inancına dayanmakta; Ahmed el-Hasan ve Abdullah Haşim, gaybetteki İmam Mehdi’nin dönüşünü sembolize eden figürler olarak kabul edilmektedir. Allah tarafından verildiği iddia edilen Bilgenin Gayesi Al-i Muhammed’in Kaiminin İncili adlı metin, bu dinin inanç sistemini şekillendirmektedir. Bu yeni kutsal kitap, Yedinci İlahi Ahit, tenasüh ve İlahi Adalet Devleti gibi temel inanç esaslarıyla birlikte modern dönem insanının dikkatini çekecek uzaylılar gibi ilginç konuları içermektedir. Ahmedi Barış ve Nur Dini’nin akidevî anlayışı, İslam dâhil önceki dinlerin tahrif edilmesinden dolayı Tanrı’nın insanoğluna kıyamete kadar devam edecek yeni bir mesaj gönderdiği düşüncesi üzerinden inşa edilmektedir. Ahmedi Barış ve Nur Dini, modern dönem insanına yeni bir spiritüel esrime alanı sunmasıyla kısa sürede dikkat çekmiştir. Tüm bu yönleriyle, bu yeni din hem İslam mezhepleri tarihi hem de New Religious Movement/Yeni Dini Hareketler literatürü için önemli ve özgün bir inceleme alanı sunmaktadır.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

The paper traces how the Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light emerged from Imami Shiʿi Mahdism through Ahmed al-Hasan and Abdullah Hashim, and by 2022 declared itself a new religion separate from Islam. It argues the movement is best classified as a millenarian New Religious Movement with syncretic beliefs and a digital-media-driven global spread.

Key findings

  • The movement began in the post-Gulf War Iraqi Shiʿi milieu: Ahmed al-Hasan claimed contact with the Hidden Imam and was seen as the *yemani*/first Mahdi; after his 2007 occultation, Abdullah Hashim formed the “Black Banners,” claimed in 2015 to be the Qaʾim-Mahdi, and in 2022 declared the Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light a new religion.
  • Its core doctrines include the Seven Divine Covenants, reincarnation (*tenasüh*), and the Divine Just State; its scripture is *The Goal of the Wise* / *Bilgenin Gayesi*, and it alters practices such as the *shahada* (“el-Mehdi Huccetullah”), basilica instead of mosque, solar Ramadan fixed in December, Kaaba located in Petra, prayer as heart prostration, headscarf not obligatory, and alcohol permitted within limits.
  • The paper reports estimates of about 7,000–15,000 members globally, activities in 40 countries, about 300 living together at the Manchester center, 20–30 members in Turkey, Instagram followers at 68.8k and Facebook at 1.3k, and the 2023 detention of about 100 members at the Kapıkule border.
  • Digital media is central: online platforms, an accessible leader as “influencer,” and a loyalty video to Abdullah Hashim for joining; persecution is presented as a human rights problem, and the group has sought recognition as an independent religion, including in Europe.

Methods

  • Descriptive method, aiming for objectivity, based on primary sources: AROPL’s *The Goal of the Wise* / *Bilgenin Gayesi*, *The Mahdi’s Manifesto*, official websites and social media, blogs, human rights reports, and the rare academic study by Introvigne and Kotkowska.
  • Data were obtained through research conducted at George Mason University under TÜBİTAK 2219 International Research Scholarship, project no. 1059B192202209.
  • Analysis is textual and descriptive rather than quantitative, reconstructing the movement’s history, theology, rituals, spread, and digital strategies.

Limitations

  • Stated by the paper: the religion is very new and still developing; its doctrinal system has become increasingly Abdullah Hashim-centered; contradictions and gaps in its own sources forced the author to develop interpretations; academic interest is limited, with mostly non-depth human rights reports and confusion with the Ahmadiyya community.
  • Stated by the paper: exact membership numbers are difficult to determine, and the 7,000–15,000 global estimate is based on websites, social media images, and rare outside sources.
  • Evident from the text: heavy reliance on the movement’s own sources and websites, with social media follower counts not necessarily indicating believers, and Turkey/global membership figures presented as tentative estimates.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18403/emakalat.1676216

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 25 Not valid · 86 Not checked · 143 Own results and interpretations

60 more claims

Create a free account to see all 254 claims and to verify the 34 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 133
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 107
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1

Create a free account to see these claims.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Avcu, Ali. “Karmatîler: Ortaya Çıkışları, Fikirleri, Edebiyatı Ve İslam Düşüncesine Katkıları”. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi 10/3 (2010), 199-246.
  2. Demirdağ, Muhammed Fatih. “Dini Hareketlerin Bir Çeşidi Bahailik”. Journal of Islamic Research 28/3 (2017), 389-399.
  3. Introvigne, Massimo - Kotkowska, Karolina Maria. “The Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light: An Introduction”. The Journal of CESNUR 8/3 (2024), 33-51.
  4. June 19th-22th, 2024 – The Second World Conference for Religious Dialogue and Cooperation – Macedonia – The Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light”. Erişim 14 Mart 2025. https://theahmadireligion.org/blog/uk- freedom-of-religion-or-belief-forum/.
  5. OHCHR. “Türkiye must not deport members of the Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light seeking asylum: UN experts”. Erişim 16 Mart 2025. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/07/turkiye-must-not-deport- members-ahmadi-religion-peace-and-light-seeking.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Küçüköner, H. R.
Affiliations
George Mason University (US)
Corresponding author
Küçüköner, Halide Rumeysa
Venue
e-Makalat Mezhep Araştırmaları Dergisi
Published
2025-06-30
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
21-46
ISSN
1309-5803 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411788451
Cited by
0
References
3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
tr
Open access
Locations
  • e-Makalat Mezhep Araştırmaları Dergisi (publishedVersion)
  • DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
TÜBİTAK (1059B192202209)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Islamic Thought and Society Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Media, Religion, Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Keywords
Imami Shiism, new religious movements, digitalization, globalization, Imam Mahdi, Islamic sects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-12, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-12 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.