Cited by 18Science Education and PedagogyEvolution and Science EducationScience Education and Perceptions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

How Does Learner-Directed Scientific Investigations Influence Students’ Questioning and Their Nature of Science Conceptions?

Avsar Erumit, Banu, Fouad, Khadija E., Akerson, Valarie L.·2019·International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology

Abstract

Action research was conducted in two sections of a scientific inquiry class in a Midwestern U.S. university to identify the types of questions that students ask for their investigations, identify emerging patterns regarding students’ questioning, and determine students’ ability to transfer their nature of science (NOS) understanding to a new scientific phenomenon. Participants included 28 non-science major freshmen and sophomores. Data sources included the Earthworm Activity Field Guide, the post-reflection sheet, The Views of Nature of Science Version B Questionnaire (VNOS-B), and audio recordings of small group discussions when students were creating and selecting questions for the first and the second investigations when they were in the field. Findings showed that students improved their ability to ask more investigable and more specific questions after conducting an investigation. Also, students asked fewer descriptive and more cause-and-effect or pattern-seeking questions after the first investigation. The results showed that students were able to apply their understandings of NOS aspects to a new concept. However, some aspects were addressed more than the others. Results suggest that giving students opportunities to ask their own questions following their own interests improves their ability to generate good investigable questions. The results also suggest that reflecting on NOS aspects during content-related inquiry activities enhances students’ NOS understandings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18404/ijemst.509246

Cites

0 references resolved

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Avsar Erumit, B., Fouad, K.E. & Akerson, V.L. (2019). The effect of learner-directed scientific investigations on students' questioning and their nature of science views. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 7(1), 20-32.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Avsar Erumit, B., Fouad, K. E., & Akerson, V. L.
Affiliations
  • Appalachian State University (US)
  • Indiana University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology
Published
2019-01-07
Pages
20-31
ISSN
2147-611X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2908565519
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks Open (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
Keywords
student questioning, question generation, reflective practice, non-science majors, university science education, earthworm activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review