Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Handwritten Text Recognition Error Rate Reduction in Historical Documents using Naive Transcribers

Christlein, Vincent, Nicolaou, Anguelos, Schlauwitz, Thorsten, Späth, Sabrina, Maier, Andreas·2018·Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.

Abstract

Handwritten text recognition (HTR) is a difficult research problem. In particular for historical documents, this task is hard as handwriting style, orthography, and text quality pose significant challenges. Creation of a single multi-purpose HTR system seems to be out of reach for current state-of-the-art systems. Therefore, we are interested in fast creation of specialized HTR systems for a particular set of historical documents. Still manual annotation by historical experts is expensive and can often not be applied at a large scale. Instead, we use the transcripts of naive transcribers that may still contain a significant amount of errors. In this paper, we propose to fuse the recognized word-chain with naive transcribers that can be obtained in a cost-effective way. For the actual fusion, we rely on a word-level approach, the so-called Recognizer Output Voting Error Reduction (ROVER). Results indicate that we are able to reduce the Word Error Rate (WER) of an HTR system trained with only few pages from 2.6 % to 19.2% with two additional transcribers with 25.1% and 27.1% WER each. This performance is already close to current state-of-the-art systems trained with significantly more data.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.18420/infdh2018-13

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Christlein, V., Nicolaou, A., Schlauwitz, T., Späth, S., & Maier, A.
Venue
Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
Publisher
Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
Published
2018
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Handwritten Text Recognition Error Rate Reduction in Historical Documents using Naive Transcribers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18420/infdh2018-13
The paper
Christlein, V., Nicolaou, A., Schlauwitz, T., Späth, S., & Maier, A. (2018). Handwritten Text Recognition Error Rate Reduction in Historical Documents using Naive Transcribers. Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. https://doi.org/10.18420/infdh2018-13

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.