The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Linking Library to Student Retention: A Statistical Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Objective - This study analyses both library expenditure and student retention. It seeks to determine if positive correlations found in a former study endure using more recent data or if alternative interpretations can be made. It includes the associate degree-granting colleges and examines whether library instruction has a greater significance on student retention over expenditure and if library instruction at the two-year college correlates to retention. Methods - The colleges and universities included in the study grant associate, bachelor, masters, and doctoral degrees, based on Carnegie Foundation classification. Data was analysed to determine if a correlation exists between the library and student persistence. Library statistics were drawn from the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Metrics database which provides reports collected from academic institutions. When aggregated, the ACRL report yielded total library expenditures, total salaries of professional staff, the professional staff full-time equivalent (FTE), fall semester student enrolment and data from a library instruction category of ACRL surveys for associate degree-granting institutions. Results - After replicating the same mathematical approach, the single category that has remained constant for all institutions is professional staff. While the former study’s analysis suggested that a relationship between library expenditure and retention existed in every Carnegie category, this study asser…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While they found that some institution types could no longer show a strong relationship between library expenditures and student retention, as had been true in previous research, they did find that a correlation remains between library FTE and student retention.”
From The Value of Academic Libraries: Library Services as a Predictor of Student Retention (2016) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Value of Academic Libraries: Library Services as a Predictor of Student Retention
Murray, A., Ireland, A., & Hackathorn, J. (2016) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.77.5.631 · Cited by 60
The Impact of Academic Library Resources on Undergraduates’ Degree Completion
Soria, K., & Fransen, J. (2017) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.78.6.812 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Eng, S., & Stadler, D.
- Affiliations
- Borough of Manhattan Community College (US)
- ORCID
- Stadler, Derek
- Venue
- Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
- Publisher
- University of Alberta Libraries
- Published
- 2015-09-13
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 50-63
- ISSN
- 1715-720X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136660948
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 26.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
- Keywords
- library expenditures, student retention, library instruction, community colleges, information literacy, higher education funding, student persistence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review