The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
If You Build it, Will They (Really) Come? Student Perceptions of Proximity and Other Factors Affecting Use of an Academic Library Curriculum Collection
Open accessAbstract
Objective – This study investigated student perceptions of an undergraduate university library’s curriculum collection, before and after a move to a new library building. The objective was to identify how factors such as proximity to program classrooms and faculty offices, flexible seating, accessibility, and other physical improvements to the space housing the collection impacted students’ perceptions. Methods – This longitudinal study conducted between 2016 and 2017 used a combination of methods to examine whether library use of a specialized academic library collection was impacted by a significant space improvement and change in location. A cohort of education students was surveyed before and after the construction of a new building that housed both the library and their department and co-located the curriculum collection with departmental teaching spaces. The students were surveyed about their use of the space and resources. The researchers then compared the survey results to circulation data. The researchers ground this study in Lefebvre’s spatial triad theory, applying it to library design and collection use (Lefebvre, 1992). Results – Researchers identified proximity to classrooms and general convenience as the dominant factors influencing students’ use of the collection. Survey results showed an increased awareness of the collection and an increase in use of the collection for completion of assignments and practicum work. Circulation data confirmed that between 2016-2019, there was a steady increase in use of the curriculum collection. Conclusion – Students’ responses revealed that physical characteristics of the space were less important than proximity, the major factor that impacted their use of the curriculum collection. This revelation confirms Lefebvre’s idea that spatial practice, i.e., how users access and use the space, is more significant and identifiable to students than the design and physical characteristics of the space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods
Lavrakas, P. (2008) · doi:10.4135/9781412963947 · Cited by 2,689
Connaway, L. S., Dickey, T. J., & Radford, M. L. (2011) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2010.12.002 · Cited by 434
What Students Want: Generation Y and the Changing Function of the Academic Library
Gardner, S., & Eng, S. (2005) · portal Libraries and the Academy · doi:10.1353/pla.2005.0034 · Cited by 204
Trends in analyzing access to information. Part I: cross-disciplinary conceptualizations of access
McCreadie, M., & Rice, R. E. (1999) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/s0306-4573(98)00037-5 · Cited by 163
“Sweeping” the library: Mapping the social activity space of the public library
Given, L. M., & Leckie, G. J. (2003) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/s0740-8188(03)00049-5 · Cited by 146
Disciplinary differences and undergraduates' information‐seeking behavior
Whitmire, E. (2002) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.10123 · Cited by 139
Zieleniec, A. (2008) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446215784 · Cited by 125
What Matters for Students' Use of Physical Library Space?
Cha, S. H., & Kim, T. W. (2015) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.014 · Cited by 113
Does the Building Still Matter? Usage Patterns in New, Expanded, and Renovated Libraries, 1995–2002
Shill, H. B., & Tonner, S. (2004) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.65.2.123 · Cited by 112
Intra-individual information behaviour in daily life
Julien, H. E., & Michels, D. H. (2003) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/s0306-4573(02)00093-6 · Cited by 103
Cited by
Crane, A. B., Adair, H. F., & Hanson, M. (2025) · Collection Management · doi:10.1080/01462679.2025.2495023 · Cited by 1
“The library is my everything”: Mapping the meaning of university library spaces in Uganda
Ilako, C., Bukirwa, J., & Macevičiūtė, E. (2025) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103145 · Cited by 1
Sheu, F.-R. (2025) · International Journal of Librarianship · doi:10.23974/ijol.2025.vol10.4.575 · Cited by 1
Tomlin, N., & Zarycky, M. (2026) · Education Libraries · doi:10.26443/el.v48i1.398
Fifty terms or more: Researching curriculum material centers
Stewart, C. (2026) · College & Undergraduate Libraries · doi:10.1080/10691316.2026.2692917
Proximity Model of Academic Library Usage
Byrne, S. (2026) · ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1145/3805696.3847131
Metadata
- Authors
- Vanderwerff, M., & Herscovitch, P.
- Affiliations
- Mount Royal University (CA)
- Venue
- Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
- Publisher
- University of Alberta Libraries
- Published
- 2021-06-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 70-88
- ISSN
- 1715-720X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3174902371
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Mount Royal University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
- Keywords
- academic library collections, curriculum collection, library use, student perceptions, library space design, library relocation, spatial practices, flexible seating, accessibility (transport and spatial geography), circulation data, pedagogy students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review