May I Borrow a Stapler? Is This All Students Ask at the Service Desk in a University Library?
Open accessAbstract
Objective – The objective of the study is to increase the knowledge about what questions students ask at the library desk and what the purpose is of their use of the desk. Our focus has been on the physical meetings with the students. The aim is to contribute to the discussion on the future development of the library service desk. Methods – We recorded questions asked at the desks to explore how students use the library service desks. The recording, where library staff sorted questions into predefined categories, took place over four weeks between the years 2017–2018. Results – Our recording showed that 63% of the questions asked at the library service desks were about loan services, document delivery, and access to physical and electronic collections. Practical things such as opening hours, lost and found items, and the location of the group study rooms, accounted for 16% of questions. Questions about information technology (IT) made up 8% of questions. Finally, the results showed that 8% of the questions from the four weeks of counting were counselling and guidance questions, and 2% were about literature lists, reference management, and reference management tools. We found more questions about counselling and guidance in the spring weeks and more practical questions in the fall. We did not find any clear connection between the number of questions and the size of the branch libraries. Conclusion – By conducting this study, we have learned more about why students use the libr…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students increasingly sought immediate support on both general and complex questions.
“Students increasingly sought immediate support on both general and complex questions (Lamøy & Kilvik, 2021).”
From Using Agentic <scp>AI</scp> to Enhance the Quality of Academic Libraries’ Responses for Student Queries (2025) · cites this paper as Lamøy & Kilvik, 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, N., & Chou, Y. (2025) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.1518 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lamøy, L. I., & Kilvik, A.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
- Venue
- Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
- Publisher
- University of Alberta Libraries
- Published
- 2021-09-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 32-45
- ISSN
- 1715-720X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3200379853
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web and Library Services
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Keywords
- library service desk, student questions, library circulation, document delivery, library access, citation management, library service development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review