The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding Apartheid in South Africa through the Racial Contract
Open accessAbstract
This article examines apartheid in South Africa and uses Mills (1992) theoretical framework of the Racial Contract to understand how this system operated and flourished in South Africa. To explicate Mills’ position about racism, this paper draws from the different tenets of Critical Race Theory (CRT) where applicable. It begins by providing an illuminating overview of apartheid in South Africa and uses education, legislation and religion as examples to help unpack the racial inequalities that were rampant in the then South Africa. It further explains the Racial Contract and uses it as an analytical tool to interrogate racism in South Africa. Mills’ argument is that the racial contract was never a contract since it was nonconsensual, hence negating the validity of its existence in South Africa. Mills contends that the Racial Contract is still in force and now operates in a more de facto stance. This paper recommends that for South Africa to transform it has to understand the ‘modus operandi’ of racism from a Critical Race Theory perspective in order to unearth the subtle nature of its manifestation in the post-apartheid era.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Medical apartheid in Palestine.
Barhoush, Y., & Amon, J. J. (2023) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2023.2201612 · Cited by 13
“…apartheid to be a crime against humanity and a violation of the Charter of the United Nations, contemporary claims of apartheid continue to be made, including in South Africa, China, Myanmar, and Israel (Amnesty International, 2017; Kushner, 1979; Mhlauli & Mokotedi, 2015; Munsterhjelm, 2019).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Mhlauli, M. B., Salani, E., & Mokotedi, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Botswana (BW)
- Venue
- International Journal of Asian Social Science
- Publisher
- Asian Economic and Social Society
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 203-209
- ISSN
- 2224-4441 (ISSN-L)
- 2226-5139
- OpenAlex
- W2270433946
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Asian Social Science (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › South African History and Culture
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Keywords
- apartheid, racial contract, critical race theory, racism, C. Wright Mills, racial inequality, legislation, post-apartheid transformation, South Africa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.