Comparison of CDC Bottle Bioassay with WHO Standard Method for Assessment Susceptibility Level of Malaria Vector, Anopheles stephensi to Three Imagicides
Open accessAbstract
Background: The detection of insecticide resistance in natural populations of Anopheles vectors is absolutely necessary for malaria control. CDC bottle bioassay as a new tools has been employed for detecting the insecticide resistance. For a limit number of mosquito vectors, diagnostic doses and diagnostic times for some insecticides have already been determined using this new assay. For the first time in the area, susceptibility levels of Anopheles stephensi was done with DDT, deltamethrin, and bendiocarb using CDC bottle bioassay and compared results with WHO standard test method. Methods: Anopheles stephensi were collected in larvae stage from the cisterns of drinking water in Chabahar port which considered as old malaria foci, Sistan and Baluchistan province. The field collected larvae were colonized at the insectary of School of Public Health (SPH), Tehran University of Medical Science. The susceptibility tests were carried out on sugar fed female mosquitoes aged 2–3 days, against DDT 4%, bendiocarb 1% and deltamethrin 0.05% using WHO and CDC susceptibility methods. The mortality and knockdown rates, as well as the parameters of regression analysis, including LT50 and LT90, was calculated separately for the WHO and CDC methods. Results: The 24h mortality rates of An. stephensi were 28.6% and 25.6% for DDT, 60.8% and 64.6% for bendiocarb and 100% for deltamethrin using both WHO and CDC assay at 30 and 60min respectively. The 50% lethal times (LT50) were estimated 44.9 and 66.2min, 38.9 and 81.8min and 0.7 and 15.0min respectively using both WHO and CDC susceptibility tests. Conclusion: The similar results of susceptibility levels were shown for DDT, bendiocarb and deltamethrin. The lethal times (LT50) showed significant difference using both WHO and CDC bioassay methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Susceptibility to propoxur is restored while resistance to bendiocarb developed in An. stephensi in recent years in Iran.
“susceptibility to propoxur is restored while resistance to bendiocarb developed in the species in recent years [59–61, 64, 68, 69, 76].”
From Evolution of insecticide resistance and its mechanisms in Anopheles stephensi in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region (2020) · cites this paper as [76]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Enayati, A., Hanafi-Bojd, A. A., Sedaghat, M. M., Zaim, M., & Hemingway, J. (2020) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-020-03335-0 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vatandoost, H., Reza Abai, M., Akbari, M., Raeisi, A., Yousefi, H., Sheikhi, S., & Bagheri, A.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Environmental Research (IR)
- National Institute of Health Researches of Iran (IR)
- Ministry of Health and Medical Education (IR)
- Venue
- Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases
- Publisher
- Knowledge E DMCC
- Published
- 2019-05-19
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-26
- ISSN
- 1735-7179 (ISSN-L)
- 2322-2271
- PMC
- PMC6643010
- OpenAlex
- W2924872019
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Journal of arthropod-borne diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Dengue and Mosquito Control Research
- Keywords
- Anopheles stephensi, insecticide resistance, malaria vectors, CDC bottle bioassay, DDT, deltamethrin, bendiocarb, insecticide susceptibility testing, lethal time, knockdown rate, Sistan and Baluchestan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review