Cited by 21Malaria Research and ControlInsect Resistance and GeneticsDengue and Mosquito Control Research

Comparison of CDC Bottle Bioassay with WHO Standard Method for Assessment Susceptibility Level of Malaria Vector, Anopheles stephensi to Three Imagicides

Open access
Vatandoost, Hassan, Reza Abai, Mohammad, Akbari, Morteza, Raeisi, Ahmad, Yousefi, Hemn, Sheikhi, Soraya, Bagheri, Akbar·2019·Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases

Abstract

Background: The detection of insecticide resistance in natural populations of Anopheles vectors is absolutely necessary for malaria control. CDC bottle bioassay as a new tools has been employed for detecting the insecticide resistance. For a limit number of mosquito vectors, diagnostic doses and diagnostic times for some insecticides have already been deter­mined using this new assay. For the first time in the area, susceptibility levels of Anopheles stephensi was done with DDT, deltamethrin, and bendiocarb using CDC bottle bioassay and compared results with WHO standard test method. Methods: Anopheles stephensi were collected in larvae stage from the cisterns of drinking water in Chabahar port which considered as old malaria foci, Sistan and Baluchistan province. The field collected larvae were colonized at the insectary of School of Public Health (SPH), Tehran University of Medical Science. The susceptibility tests were carried out on sugar fed female mosquitoes aged 2–3 days, against DDT 4%, bendiocarb 1% and deltamethrin 0.05% using WHO and CDC susceptibility methods. The mortality and knockdown rates, as well as the parameters of regression analysis, includ­ing LT50 and LT90, was calculated separately for the WHO and CDC methods. Results: The 24h mortality rates of An. stephensi were 28.6% and 25.6% for DDT, 60.8% and 64.6% for bendiocarb and 100% for deltamethrin using both WHO and CDC assay at 30 and 60min respectively. The 50% lethal times (LT50) were estimated 44.9 and 66.2min, 38.9 and 81.8min and 0.7 and 15.0min respectively using both WHO and CDC susceptibility tests. Conclusion: The similar results of susceptibility levels were shown for DDT, bendiocarb and deltamethrin. The lethal times (LT50) showed significant difference using both WHO and CDC bioassay methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18502/jad.v13i1.929

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vatandoost, H., Reza Abai, M., Akbari, M., Raeisi, A., Yousefi, H., Sheikhi, S., & Bagheri, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Environmental Research (IR)
  • National Institute of Health Researches of Iran (IR)
  • Ministry of Health and Medical Education (IR)
Venue
Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases
Published
2019-05-19
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
17-26
ISSN
  • 1735-7179 (ISSN-L)
  • 2322-2271
OpenAlex
W2924872019
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of arthropod-borne diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Dengue and Mosquito Control Research
Keywords
Anopheles stephensi, insecticide resistance, malaria vectors, CDC bottle bioassay, DDT, deltamethrin, bendiocarb, insecticide susceptibility testing, lethal time, knockdown rate, Sistan and Baluchestan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review