Sustainability Impact Assessment of Waste to Energy Technologies in Iran
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Current energy sources are coming to end and one of the main priorities of the country’s management is the energy recovery from renewable energy. Considerable quantity of municipal solid waste (MSW) is one of the most serious urban pollution sources. Impact assessment matrix is a new and fast tool for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Materials and Methods: In this regard, renewable energy like waste-to-energy was investigated. Environmental assessment method was performed to evaluate the environmental impacts of common Waste to Energy (WTE) technologies by Wooten and Rau matrix. Most available WTE technologies (anaerobic digestion, sanitary landfill with gas recovery, waste incineration, and gasification) were environmentally assessed and compared. Results: Results showed that anaerobic digestion could be most environmental friendly WTE technology for production of renewable energy from organic waste and could be considered. Furthermore, executives as green minded managements can improve the quality of waste management by finding new solutions. Other technologies such as landfill by gas recovery and gasification will be ranked second and third in terms of environmental effect. Conclusion: Results showed that performing anaerobic digestion technology will produce less environmental impact in long term. Then landfilling by gas recovery and gasification technologies will be ranked second and third in terms of environmental effect.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A critical review for the impact of anaerobic digestion on the sustainable development goals
Piadeh, F., Offie, I., Behzadian, K., Rizzuto, J. P., Bywater, A., Córdoba-Pachón, J.-R., & Walker, M. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119458 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
“…cooperation can be developed to increase high-value-added production and economic productivity, enhance global resource efficiency in the cycle of consumption and production, and define new scientific research and technological capabilities of related industrial sectors (Teimouri et al., 2019).”
- Authors
- Teimouri, F., Teimouri, F., Ebrahimi, A. A., Jalili, M., & Alaghehbandan, H. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Health and Sustainable Development
- Publisher
- Knowledge E DMCC
- Published
- 2019-12-16
- ISSN
- 2476-6267 (ISSN-L)
- 2476-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2995066774
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Health and Sustainable Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
- Keywords
- waste-to-energy technologies, municipal solid waste, anaerobic digestion, landfill gas recovery, waste incineration, gasification, environmental impact assessment, renewable energy, organic waste, waste management, Iran
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review