A Qualitative Inquiry on the Perception of Assistants of Students with Disabilities in University
Abstract
장애학생의 고등교육 지원을 위한 실천적 노력으로 2005년부터 국가차원의 재정지원 보조를 바탕으로 각 대학에서 장애학생 도우미가 운영되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 대학생들의 장애학생 도우미 경험을 통해 교수-학습활동 보조의 효용성과 개선방안을 찾아 장애대학생의 학습권 보장과 장애학생과 장애학생 도우미 간의 긍정적 관계 확장 방안을 알아보고자 하였다. 연구 참여자는 충북 소재의 한 대학을 중심으로 최근 3년간 장애학생 도우미를 1년 이상 경험한 대학생 15명으로 포커스 그룹을 실시하였다. 수집된 포커스 그룹 자료는 질적 분석되었다. 질적 분석한 결과 (1) 장애학생 도우미 지원 범위와 내용 (2) 장애학생 도우미 지원의 어려움 (3) 장애학생 도우미 지원 방향으로 3개의 대주제로 도출되었다. 논의와 결론에서는 장애대학생의 학습권을 보장하기 위해 장애대학생 도우미 제도의 개선을 위한 방향이 제시되었고 제도 보완을 위한 후속연구를 제언하였다.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interaction between SWDs and PNTs in PNTPs is predominantly unidirectional.
“We found that the interaction between SWDs and PNTs was predominantly unidirectional”
From EmoBridge: Bridging the Communication Gap between Students with Disabilities and Peer Note-Takers Utilizing Emojis and Real-Time Sharing (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
Research on solutions to address unidirectional interaction issues and on specific needs of each participant remains limited.
“However, research on solutions to address these issues and on the specific needs of each participant remains limited [20].”
From EmoBridge: Bridging the Communication Gap between Students with Disabilities and Peer Note-Takers Utilizing Emojis and Real-Time Sharing (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
Communication within PNTPs tends to be unidirectional.
“Our formative study reaffirmed that communication within PNTPs tends to be unidirectional [7, 20].”
From EmoBridge: Bridging the Communication Gap between Students with Disabilities and Peer Note-Takers Utilizing Emojis and Real-Time Sharing (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Song, H., Shin, M., Chu, H., Hong, J., Lee, J., Eun, J., & Lim, H. (2024) · The 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3663548.3675629 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kim, M. S.
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Mi Sun
- ORCID
- Kim, Mi Sun
- Venue
- Special Education Research
- Published
- 2011-02-28
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 187
- ISSN
- 1598-7043 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118552644
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Special Education Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Education › Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
- Keywords
- students with disabilities, higher education support, university students' perceptions, teaching and learning support, right to education, disability support policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
