The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining the Value and Quality of Health Economic Analyses: Implications of Utilizing the QHES
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the increasing use of health economic studies and practical implications of evaluating their quality utilizing the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument. METHODS: We first reviewed secondary references to examine ways in which health economic analyses are used in different health care settings, the manner in which these data are appraised and evaluated, and their relevance and value in decision making. The QHES, a new instrument designed to support fast, accurate initial assessments of study quality, was then introduced and validated. A case study was performed using the QHES to score the quality of 30 cost-effectiveness studies in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) published since 1985. Areas where additional research could guide efforts to identify and enhance the use of higher-quality cost-effectiveness studies were suggested. RESULTS: Results from the published validation study of the QHES demonstrated the validity of this new instrument. The resulting QHES scores in the case study of GERD papers ranged from 43 to 91 with a mean of 63.6 (SD=14.7). Approximately 27% of the studies rated had scores less than 50, and 27% had scores above or equal to 75. All 30 studies made conclusions and recommendations and justified them based on their study results. Most studies used appropriate cost and health outcome measures. Very few studies stated the perspective of their analysis and reasons for its selection. The majority of the studies did not perform incremental analysis. CONCLUSION: An examination of the QHES validation study and the case study in GERD suggests that there is a rationale and potential utility to use a quality scoring system for cost-effectiveness studies. The QHES may play an important role in discriminating higher-quality cost-effectiveness information to enhance decision making. The QHES can also serve as a guideline for conducting and reporting future cost-effectiveness studies, as an aid in the editorial process, and for stratification in systematic reviews. Complex decisions regarding resource allocation rarely rely solely on economic considerations but do increasingly use health economic analyses. To the extent that such analyses are used, the QHES may help ensure that higher-quality analyses receive more analytic attention and greater weight in the decision-making process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As per standard practice using this framework, the studies were deemed to be of good quality if they attained a score of 75/100 or higher [5].”
From Use of health economic evaluation in the implementation and improvement science fields—a systematic literature review (2019) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“The QHES instrument was designed to more easily tell the difference between high-quality and low-quality studies [5].”
From Use of health economic evaluation in the implementation and improvement science fields—a systematic literature review (2019) · cites this paper as [5]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 · Cited by 17,582
Moher, D., Pham, B., Jones, A., Cook, D. J., Jadad, A. R., Moher, M., Tugwell, P., & Klassen, T. P. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)01085-x · Cited by 3,560
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Guyatt, G. H. (1993) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.270.17.2096 · Cited by 3,083
Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
Weinstein, M. C. (1996) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540150055031 · Cited by 2,455 · cited 1×
“Weinstein et al., 1996.”
The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis
Jüni, P. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.11.1054 · Cited by 1,981
Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ
Drummond, M. F., & Jefferson, T. O. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275 · Cited by 1,827
Moher, D., Jadad, A. R., Nichol, G., Penman, M., Tugwell, P., & Walsh, S. (1995) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(94)00031-w · Cited by 1,308
The Role of Cost-effectiveness Analysis in Health and Medicine
Russell, L. B. (1996) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540140060028 · Cited by 1,167
Are Guidelines Following Guidelines?
Shaneyfelt, T. M., Mayo‐Smith, M. F., & Rothwangl, J. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.20.1900 · Cited by 853
Robinson, R. (1993) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.307.6907.793 · Cited by 819
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J. Are guidelines following guide- lines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer- reviewed medical literature. JAMA. 1999;281:1900-05.
- Drummond MF, Richardson WS, O'Brien BJ, et al. User' s guide to the medical literature. XIII. How to use an article on economic analysis of clinical practice. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1997; 277:1552-57.
- O'Brien B, Heyland D, Richardson WS, et al. User' s guide to the medical litera- ture. XIII. How to use an article on economic analysis of clinical practice. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA.1997; 277:1802-06.
- Sonnenberg A, Inadomi JM, Becker LA. Economic analysis of step-wise treat- ment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999;13:1003-13.
- Stalhammar NO. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of medical treatments in Examining the Value and Quality of Health Economic Analyses: Implications of Utilizing the QHES acid-related diseases. The Markov chain approach applied to a comparison between intermittent and maintenance treatment of reflux esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1993;199:8-13.
- Bate C, Richardson P. Cost-effectiveness of omeprazole in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in clinical practice. Br J Med Econ. 1994;7:81-97.
- Bate C, Hungin A, Wilcock C. Cost-effective management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in general practice. Br J Med Econ. 1993;6:81-90.
- Bate C, Green J, Taylor M. Cost-effective prophylaxis against the recurrence of benign oesophageal stricture. Br J Med Econ. 1995;8:97-107.
- Bate C, Richardson P. A one-year model for the cost-effectiveness of treating reflux oesophagitis. Br J Med Econ. 1992;2:5-11.
- Bate C. Cost-effectiveness of omeprazole in the treatment of reflux oesophagi- tis. Br J Med Econ. 1991;1:53-61.
- Bate C, Richardson P. Symptomatic assessment and cost effectiveness of treat- ments for reflux oesophagitis: comparisons of omeprazole and histamine H2- receptor antagonists. Br J Med Econ. 1992;2:37-48.
- Green J, Bate C, Copeman M. A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of omeprazole and ranitidine in reflux oesophagitis. Br J Med Econ. 1995;8:37-48.
- Jonsson B, Stalhammar NO. The cost-effectiveness of omeprazole and raniti- dine in intermittent and maintenance treatment of reflux oesophagitis-the case of Sweden. Br J Med Econ. 1993;6:111-26.
- Phillips C, Moore A. Trial and error-an expensive luxury: economic analysis of effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors and histamine antagonists in treating reflux disease. Br J Med Econ. 1997;11:55-63.
- Bate C, Richardson P. Cost-effectiveness of 20 mg and 40 mg of omeprazole in oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Med Econ. 1993;6:59-66.
- Torrance GW, Blaker D, Detsky A, et al. Canadian guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals. Canadian Collaborative Workshop for Pharmacoeconomics. Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;9:535-59.
- Economic analysis of health care technology. A report on principles. Task Force on Principles for Economic Analysis of Health Care Technology. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:61-70.
- Drummond M, O'Brien B, Stoddart G, Torrance GW. Critical Assessment of Economic Evaluation. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford, England: Oxford Medical Publications; 1997:27-51.
- Drummond MF, Jefferson TO. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. BMJ. 1996;313:275-83.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 366
Rezapour, A., Behroozi, Z., Nasirzadeh, M., Rezaeian, M., Barzegar, M., Tashakori-Miyanroudi, M., Sayyad, A., & Souresrafil, A. (2023) · Infectious Diseases of Poverty · doi:10.1186/s40249-023-01092-1 · Cited by 10
Non-communicable Disease Prevention
(eds.), A. J. C., Teerawattananon, Y., Archer, R. A., & Isaranuwatchai, W. (2019) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0195 · Cited by 10
Mbivnjo, E. L., Lynch, M., & Huws, J. C. (2021) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s10389-021-01590-2 · Cited by 9
Uzoaru, F., Nwaozuru, U., Ong, J. J., Obi, F. A., Obiezu‐Umeh, C., Tucker, J. D., Shato, T., Mason, S., Carter, V., Manu, S., et al. (2021) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-021-00177-y · Cited by 10
Economic Evaluation of Monoclonal Antibodies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
Koilakou, S., & Petrou, P. (2021) · Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40291-021-00560-4 · Cited by 9
The economics of TAVI: A systematic review
Petrou, P. (2023) · IJC Heart & Vasculature · doi:10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101173 · Cited by 10
Santos, B. D. L., Kim, M., Alsharif, A. H., Gharib, A. M., Kim, J., Binu, B., Touchette, D. R., & Pérez, A. (2025) · JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY · doi:10.1002/jac5.70034 · Cited by 8
Choon-Quinones, M., Zelei, T., Németh, B., Tóth, M., Jia, X. Y., Barnett, M., Keown, P. A., Durie, B. G. M., Harousseau, J., Hose, D., et al. (2022) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2022.2144056 · Cited by 8
Taylor, R., Sullivan, D., Reeves, P., Kerr, N., Sawyer, A., Schwartzkoff, E., Bailey, A. W., Williams, C. M., & Hure, A. J. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20126139 · Cited by 11
Ahmed, A., Dujaili, J. A., Chuah, L., Hashmi, F. K., Le, L. K., Khanal, S., Awaisu, A., & Chaiyakunapruk, N. (2023) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-023-00818-4 · Cited by 8
The quality of economic studies of cancer pharmacogenomics: a quantitative appraisal of the evidence
Yang, M., Patil, D. S., Tufail, W., & Issa, A. M. (2013) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1586/14737167.2013.838023 · Cited by 8
Autologous Stem Cells in Cervical Spine Fusion
Hsieh, P. C., Chung, A. S., Brodke, D. S., Park, J., Skelly, A. C., Brodt, E., Chang, K., Buser, Z., Meisel, H. J., Yoon, S. T., et al. (2020) · Global Spine Journal · doi:10.1177/2192568220948479 · Cited by 8
Lu, Z. K., Xiong, X., Lee, T., Wu, J., Yuan, J., & Jiang, B. (2021) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.700012 · Cited by 7
Gao, W., Muston, D., Monberg, M., McLaurin, K. K., Hettle, R., Szamreta, E. A., Swallow, E., Zhang, S., Kalemaj, I., Signorovitch, J., et al. (2020) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-020-00949-9 · Cited by 8
Fens, T., Zhou, G., Postma, M. J., van Puijenbroek, E., & van Boven, J. F. M. (2021) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1080/14656566.2021.1873953 · Cited by 8
Veldman, H. D., de Bot, R. T. A. L., Heyligers, I. C., Boymans, T. A. E. J., & Hiligsmann, M. (2021) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2021.1878880 · Cited by 8
Cost-utility studies in upper limb orthopaedic surgery
Rajan, P. V., Qudsi, R. A., Dyer, G. S. M., & Losina, E. (2018) · The Bone & Joint Journal · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.100b11.bjj-2018-0246.r1 · Cited by 8
The Role of Decision Analytic Modeling in the Health Economic Assessment of Spinal Intervention
Edwards, N. C., Skelly, A. C., Ziewacz, J. E., Cahill, K., & McGirt, M. J. (2014) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000000567 · Cited by 8
Martin‐Misener, R., Harbman, P., Donald, F., Reid, K., Kilpatrick, K., Carter, N., Bryant‐Lukosius, D., Kaasalainen, S., Marshall, D. A., Charbonneau-Smith, R., et al. (2021) · doi:10.32920/14637459.v1 · Cited by 8
Synthesized economic evidence on the cost-effectiveness of screening familial hypercholesterolemia
Wang, M., Jiang, S., Li, B., Parkinson, B., Lu, J., Tan, K., Gu, Y., & Li, S. (2024) · Global Health Research and Policy · doi:10.1186/s41256-024-00382-x · Cited by 7
Methodology of economic evaluations in spine surgery: a systematic review and qualitative assessment
Droeghaag, R., Schuermans, V. N. E., Hermans, S. M. M., Smeets, A. Y. J. M., Caelers, I. J. M. H., Hiligsmann, M., Evers, S., van Hemert, W. L. W., & van Santbrink, H. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067871 · Cited by 8
Community-Based Services by Pharmacists: A Systematic Review of Cost-Utility Analyses
Sanyal, C., & Husereau, D. (2019) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2019.08.013 · Cited by 8
Byun, J., Park, S., Ng, B. P., Liu, Y., Kim, C.-R., & Park, C. (2022) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1080/14656566.2022.2095203 · Cited by 7
Stevens, E. R., Farrell, D., Jumkhawala, S. A., & Ladapo, J. A. (2018) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2018.06.013 · Cited by 7
The Role of Review and Synthesis Methods in Decision Models
Marsh, K. (2010) · doi:10.1002/9781444320398.ch2 · Cited by 7
Screening for chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of emerging evidence and perspectives
Li, J., Zhao, M., & He, Q. (2025) · Renal Failure · doi:10.1080/0886022x.2025.2572353 · Cited by 9
Zischke, J., White, N. M., & Gordon, L. G. (2021) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1353 · Cited by 6
Economic Evaluation of Oral Cancer Screening Programs: Review of Outcomes and Study Designs
Raman, S., Shafie, A. A., Tan, B. Y., Abraham, M. T., Kiong, S. C., & Cheong, S. C. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11081198 · Cited by 6
Nédellec, E., Pineau, J., Prognon, P., & Martelli, N. (2018) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-018-0429-z · Cited by 6
Szewczyk, Z., Weaver, N., Rollo, M. E., Deeming, S., Holliday, E. G., Reeves, P., & Collins, C. E. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12113532 · Cited by 8
Sun, H., Jin, C., Wang, H., Hu, S., Chen, Y., & Wang, H. (2022) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2022.2050217 · Cited by 6
A systematic review on the cost‐effectiveness of the computer‐assisted orthopedic system
Li, H., Zhuang, T., Wu, W., Gan, W., Wu, C., Peng, S., Huan, S., & Liu, N. (2022) · Health care science · doi:10.1002/hcs2.23 · Cited by 6
Cost-Effectiveness of Glucosamine in Osteoarthritis Treatment: A Systematic Review
Vo, N. X., Le, N. N. H., Chu, T. D. P., Pham, H. L., Dinh, K. X. A., Che, U. T. T., Ngo, T. T. T., & Bui, T. T. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11162340 · Cited by 6
Noninvasive Fetal RhD Blood Group Genotyping: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations
Gajic‐Veljanoski, O., Li, C., Schaink, A. K., Guo, J., Higgins, C., Shehata, N., Okun, N. B., de Vrijer, B., Pechlivanoglou, P., Ng, V., et al. (2021) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2021.07.014 · Cited by 6
Sanyal, C., & Rendon, R. A. (2026) · Therapeutic Advances in Urology · doi:10.1177/17562872261436874 · Cited by 5
Primeau, C. A., Zomar, B. O., Somerville, L. E., Joshi, I., Giffin, J. R., & Marsh, J. D. (2021) · Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/2325967120987241 · Cited by 5
Isaranuwatchai, W., Archer, R. A., & Culyer, A. J. (2019) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0195.01 · Cited by 5
Cost-Effectiveness of Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase Inhibitors in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review
Chan, V. K. Y., Yang, R., Wong, I. C. K., & Li, X. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.891149 · Cited by 5
Nam, K.-A., Cho, D., Kim, H.-J., Kwon, B., Yoon, Y., Park, C., Kim, E.-S., Youn, J., & Park, S. (2023) · Clinical Drug Investigation · doi:10.1007/s40261-023-01283-6 · Cited by 5
Arabloo, J., Ahmadizadeh, E., Rezapour, A., Ehsanzadeh, . J., Alipour, V., Peighambari, M. M., Asiabar, A. S., & Souresrafil, A. (2024) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1080/17434440.2024.2354472 · Cited by 5
Vellopoulou, K., Kourlaba, G., Maniadakis, N., & Vardas, P. E. (2016) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.02.140 · Cited by 5
Health economic modelling in Cystic Fibrosis: A systematic review
Mohindru, B., Turner, D., Sach, T., Bilton, D., Carr, S. B., Archangelidi, O., Bhadhuri, A., & Whitty, J. A. (2019) · Journal of Cystic Fibrosis · doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2019.01.007 · Cited by 5
Current State of Health Economic Analyses for Low-Grade Glioma Management: A Systematic Review
Tuohy, K. J., Fernandez, A., Hamidi, N., Padmanaban, V., & Mansouri, A. (2021) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.112 · Cited by 5
Cost-Utility Analyses in US Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review
Karhade, A. V., & Kwon, J. Y. (2018) · Foot & Ankle Specialist · doi:10.1177/1938640018782588 · Cited by 5
A systematic review of the methodological quality of economic studies evaluating ophthalmic drugs
Ribeiro, I., Marques, F. B., Alves, D. G., & Alves, C. (2019) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2019.1579646 · Cited by 5
Global Economic Burden of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Systematic Literature Review
Elshahawy, R., Elezbawy, B., Ashmawy, R., Elshahawy, R., Mahmoud, Y. S., Korra, N., Abaza, S., Alnajjar, A., Alabdulkarim, H. A., Al‐Omar, H. A., et al. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.81023 · Cited by 4
Yi, S., Hong, J., Yoon, H., Lim, Y.-N., & Bae, E.-Y. (2022) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-022-00746-9 · Cited by 4
Lee, Y.-C., Jou, Y., Cheng, M.-C., Shen, C., & Lin, C.-T. (2022) · Urological Science · doi:10.4103/uros.uros_54_21 · Cited by 4
Martín-García, P., Alonso‐Arroyo, A., & Catalá-López, F. (2023) · Medicina Clínica · doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2023.02.006 · Cited by 4
Amato, A. T., & Émond, G. (2023) · The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality · doi:10.3138/cjhs-2022-0048 · Cited by 4
The Value of Social Work to Health, Health Systems, and Interprofessional Teams: A Scoping Review
Ross, A. M., Jashinski, J., Lombardo, M. Z., Keane, J., & Wilkinson, G. W. (2024) · Social Work Research · doi:10.1093/swr/svad022 · Cited by 4
Abushanab, D., Alsoukhni, O., & Al‐Badriyeh, D. (2019) · Value in Health Regional Issues · doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2018.11.001 · Cited by 4
Azharuddin, M., Adil, M., Khan, R. A., Ghosh, P., Kapur, P., & Sharma, M. (2020) · Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia · doi:10.1016/j.afos.2020.05.006 · Cited by 4
Cost-effectiveness of brentuximab vedotin in Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review
Arabloo, J., Azari, S., Gorji, H. A., Rezapour, A., Alipour, V., & Ehsanzadeh, . J. (2023) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00228-023-03557-6 · Cited by 4
Requirements for a Successful Drug Launch in Small Markets: A Pilot Study in Lebanon
Ramadan, B., Metni, M., Hamadeh, G. N., Kurdi, M., & Karam, R. (2019) · Value in Health Regional Issues · doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2019.01.006 · Cited by 4
Barrera, F. J., Toloza, F. J. K., Ponce, O. J., Hernández, J. A. Z., Prokop, L. J., Shah, N. D., Guyatt, G. H., Rodríguez‐Gutiérrez, R., & Montori, V. M. (2020) · Endocrine · doi:10.1007/s12020-020-02489-w · Cited by 4
Yoder, J. L., & Kamal, K. M. (2009) · The Open Cancer Immunology Journal · doi:10.2174/1876401000902010001 · Cited by 4
Assessing the Quality of Economic Evaluations of FDA Novel Drug Approvals
Woersching, A. L., Borrego, M. E., & Raisch, D. W. (2016) · Annals of Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1177/1060028016662893 · Cited by 4
Dolatshahi, Z., Mezginejad, F., Nargesi, S., & Saliminejad, M. (2021) · Iranian Journal of Radiology · doi:10.5812/iranjradiol.109932 · Cited by 4
Cost effectiveness of fall prevention programmes for older adults
Benedetto, V., Hill, J. E., & Harrison, J. (2022) · British Journal of Community Nursing · doi:10.12968/bjcn.2022.27.11.530 · Cited by 3
Basics of health economics for clinical trials in orthopaedic trauma
Walter, N., Hierl, K., Rupp, M., & Alt, V. (2023) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2023.110878 · Cited by 3
Zhong, J., Liu, Y., Qian, F., Huang, D., Gong, W., & Zou, J. (2024) · Cancer Management and Research · doi:10.2147/cmar.s464831 · Cited by 3
Zavare, A. S. N., Rezapour, A., Souresrafil, A., Rouholamin, S., & Nassiri, S. (2024) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2024.2417014 · Cited by 3
Cost-effectiveness of Telemedicine Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review
Abedinejad, M., Hadian, M. R., Behrooj, S., Faradonbeh, S. B., & Saniee, N. (2024) · Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · doi:10.47176/mjiri.38.103 · Cited by 3
Park, S., Chun, H. K., & Park, C. (2019) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2019.1680289 · Cited by 3
Feng, M., Yang, Y., Liao, W., & Li, Q. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.768765 · Cited by 3
Tefera, B. B., Demsie, D. G., Yehualaw, A., Tafere, C., Feyisa, K., Yismaw, M. B., Kefale, B., & Yilma, Z. (2023) · PharmacoEconomics - Open · doi:10.1007/s41669-023-00433-y · Cited by 3
Economic Evidence in Occupational Therapy: A Rapid Review
Freeman, A. R., Larivière, N., Baillet, J., Beauchemin, R., Lavoie-Trudeau, É., Martel, M., & St-François, M. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1177/00084174241306983 · Cited by 3
Evaluation and Characterization of Health Economics and Outcomes Research in SAARC Nations
Mehta, M. N., & Nerurkar, R. (2017) · Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science · doi:10.1177/2168479017731583 · Cited by 3
Impact of New Diagnostic Approaches for Invasive Candidiasis on Antifungal Stewardship
Sofjan, A. K., Musgrove, R. J., & Garey, K. W. (2016) · Current Fungal Infection Reports · doi:10.1007/s12281-016-0257-2 · Cited by 3
Zabala, M. V., & Bachelet, V. C. (2026) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-026-00774-4 · Cited by 2
Primeau, C. A., Joshi, I., Zomar, B. O., Somerville, L. E., Philpott, H. T., McHugh, D. D., Lanting, B. A., Vasarhelyi, E. M., & Marsh, J. D. (2020) · Current Treatment Options in Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s40674-020-00157-8 · Cited by 2
Donald, F., Kilpatrick, K., Reid, K., Carter, N., Martin‐Misener, R., Bryant‐Lukosius, D., Harbman, P., Kaasalainen, S., Marshall, D. A., Charbonneau-Smith, R., et al. (2021) · doi:10.32920/14637009.v1 · Cited by 2
Lum, K. Y., Oppong, R., & Kigozi, J. (2022) · Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/10105395221122643 · Cited by 2
Courtney, D., Mason, J., Amani, B., Rodak, T., Szatmári, P., Henderson, J. L., & de Oliveira, C. (2024) · Early Intervention in Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/eip.13498 · Cited by 2
Cost-effectiveness of ace inhibitors versus ARBs in heart failure management
Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Elendu, T. C., Amaechi, E. C., Elendu, I. D., Jingwa, K. A., Chiegboka, S. F., Bhadana, U., Abdelatti, A. M. S., Ikeji, I. V., et al. (2024) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000039496 · Cited by 2
Economic Evaluations of Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Adolescents: A Scoping Review
de Oliveira, C., Mason, J., Amani, B., Rodak, T., Szatmári, P., Henderson, J. L., & Courtney, D. (2025) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2025.02.005 · Cited by 2
Economic Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis Therapeutic Interventions: A Systematic Review
Gorji, H. A., Moeini, S., Sheikhrobat, M. V., Rezapour, A., Souresrafil, A., & Barzegar, M. (2025) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.70815 · Cited by 2
Cost-Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners
Huang, L. (2015) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 2
Does Direct-care Staffing Impact Nursing Home Outcomes? A Systematic Review
Schlage, V., & Blankart, C. R. (2016) · Die Unternehmung · doi:10.5771/0042-059x-2016-3-291 · Cited by 2
Caicedo‐Martínez, M., Ordóñez‐Reyes, C., Fernández-Deaza, G. P., Murillo, R., Mello, M. B., & Nuche‐Berenguer, B. (2020) · Universitas Médica · doi:10.11144/javeriana.umed61-4.ccep · Cited by 2
Lamplot, J. D., Sharma, A. K., Sullivan, S. W., Allen, A. A., & Nwachukwu, B. U. (2021) · Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.026 · Cited by 2
Self-citationThoma, A., & Ignacy, T. A. (2012) · Plastic Surgery · doi:10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000771 · Cited by 2
Martin‐Misener, R., Harbman, P., Donald, F., Reid, K., Kilpatrick, K., Carter, N., Bryant‐Lukosius, D., Kaasalainen, S., Marshall, D. A., Charbonneau-Smith, R., et al. (2021) · doi:10.32920/14637459 · Cited by 2
Mohammadnezhad, G., Azadmehr, B., & Yousefi, N. (2022) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2022.2130761 · Cited by 2
Costi, M. P., de Dios, J. G., & del Castillo, J. A. S. (2010) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 2
Contingent Valuation Studies in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Health Economic Review
Nwachukwu, B. U., Eliasberg, C. D., Hamid, K. S., Fu, M. C., Bach, B. R., Allen, A. A., & Albert, T. J. (2018) · HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11420-018-9610-z · Cited by 2
Gajic‐Veljanoski, O., Sanyal, C., McMartin, K., Xie, X., Walter, M. C., Higgins, C., Sikich, N., Dhalla, I. A., & Ng, V. (2018) · Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · doi:10.1037/cap0000155 · Cited by 3
Reider, B. J. (2015) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546515588309 · Cited by 2
Pharmacoeconomics of cardiovascular disease prevention
Stevanović, J. (2015) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 2
Souresrafil, A., Abutorabi, A., Peighambari, M. M., Noohi, F., & Haghjoo, M. (2022) · Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · doi:10.47176/mjiri.36.6 · Cited by 1
Perea-Bello, A. H., Trapero‐Bertran, M., & Dürsteler, C. (2024) · Diseases · doi:10.3390/diseases12100243 · Cited by 1
Petrou, P. (2024) · Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2024.106161 · Cited by 2
Brault, M. W., Rein, D. B., & Graham, A. L. (2025) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2025.2529721 · Cited by 1
Cost-effectiveness of MRI strategies for early prostate cancer detection: a systematic review
Zavare, A. S. N., Shahkoohi, A. N., Khalili, F., Rezapour, A., Afshari, S., Alipour, S., & Asiabar, A. S. (2025) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2025.2543464 · Cited by 1
Moradi, S., Khajeamiri, Y., Zandi, S., Keramati, M., & Mohammadnezhad, G. (2025) · Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation · doi:10.1186/s12962-025-00702-z · Cited by 2
Assessing the economic burden of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic literature review
Broughton, E. I., Colosia, A. D., Bektas, M., Kuper, K. M., & Kotb, R. E. M. (2025) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-025-01846-8 · Cited by 1
Cai, Y., Tang, Q., Lin, T., Wang, D., Hu, M., & Yang, N. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1738097 · Cited by 1
Introduction to the Technical Issues of Economic Evaluation
Fragoulakis, V., Mitropoulou, C., Williams, M. S., & Patrinos, G. P. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801497-4.00004-7 · Cited by 1
Roberts, M. H., Borrego, M. E., Kharat, A. A., Marshik, P. L., & Mapel, D. W. (2016) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1586/14737167.2016.1148602 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ofman, J. J., Sullivan, S. D., Neumann, P. J., Chiou, C.-F., Henning, J. M., Wade, S. W., & Hay, J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy
- Publisher
- Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-61
- ISSN
- 1083-4087 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-706X
- PMC
- PMC10437166
- OpenAlex
- W2130921523
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 9.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Keywords
- instrument validation, gastroesophageal reflux disease, healthcare decision-making, resource allocation, reporting guidelines, systematic reviews
- MeSH terms
- Cost-Benefit Analysis, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, United States, Economics, Pharmaceutical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review