Cited by 94Medication Adherence and ComplianceBone health and osteoporosis researchPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

The Association of Adherence to Osteoporosis Therapies with Fracture, All-Cause Medical Costs, and All-Cause Hospitalizations: A Retrospective Claims Analysis of Female Health Plan Enrollees with Osteoporosis

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis affects approximately 10 million people in the United States and is associated with increased fracture risk and fracture-related costs. Poor adherence to osteoporosis medications is associated with higher general burden of illness compared with optimal adherence. OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations of adherence to osteoporosis therapies with (a) occurrence of closed fracture, (b) all-cause medical costs, and (c) all-cause hospitalizations. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of administrative claims data examined women with osteoporosis initiating therapy with alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, or raloxifene from July 1, 2002, to March 10, 2006. Data were from a large, geographically diverse U.S. health plan that covered about 12.6 million females during the identification period. Commercially insured and Medicare Advantage plan enrollees were observed for 1 year before (baseline period) and 540 days after therapy initiation (follow-up period). Outcomes included closed fractures, all-cause medical costs, and all-cause hospitalizations; all outcomes were measured starting 180 days after therapy initiation through follow-up. All subjects had at least 2 pharmacy claims for any of the targeted osteoporosis medications. Adherence was measured with a medication possession ratio (MPR) and accounted for all osteoporosis treatment. High adherence was MPR of at least 0.80; low adherence was MPR less than 0.50. Covariates included baseline fracture, "early" fracture (in the first 180 days of follow-up), baseline corticosteroid or thyroid hormone use, health status indicators, and demographic characteristics. Outcome fractures were modeled with Cox survival regression with time-dependent cumulative MPR. All-cause medical costs and all-cause hospitalizations were modeled, respectively, with generalized linear model regression (gamma distribution, log link) and negative binomial regression. RESULTS: The sample comprised 21,655 patients--16,295 (75.2%) commercial and 5,360 (24.8%) Medicare Advantage. During the entire follow-up period, 5,406 (33.2%) and 2,253 (42.0%) of commercial and Medicare Advantage patients, respectively, had low adherence. Adherence tended to decrease over the follow-up period. The Cox regression showed that commercial plan patients with low versus high adherence had 37% higher risk of fracture (hazard ratio = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.12-1.68). Adherence was not significantly associated with fracture in the Medicare Advantage cohort. Commercial and Medicare Advantage patients with low versus high adherence had 12% (exponentiated coefficient = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.02-1.24) and 18% (exponentiated coefficient = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.04-1.35) higher all-cause medical costs during months 7 through 18 of follow-up. Commercial and Medicare Advantage patients with low versus high adherence had 59% (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.38-1.83) and 34% (IRR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.13-1.58) more all-cause hospitalizations during months 7 through 18 of follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Low adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy was associated with higher risk of fracture for commercially insured but not Medicare Advantage patients and with higher all-cause medical costs and more all-cause hospitalizations in both groups. These results are consistent with the literature and highlight the importance of promoting better adherence among patients with osteoporosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.1.25

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For all levels of non-adherence, costs of non-adherence were higher for Medicare supplemental patients.

    “The findings were that, for all levels of non-adherence, costs of non-adherence were higher for Medicare supplemental patients.45”

    From Economic impact of medication non-adherence by disease groups: a systematic review (2018) · cites this paper as [45]

    The medical-cost results (page unavailable) report higher adjusted costs with low versus high adherence in both groups, with a larger percentage increase in Medicare Advantage patients (18%) than commercial patients (12%). Moderate adherence was also associated with higher costs in the Medicare Advantage group, but not significantly in the commercial group. The claim calls these patients “Medicare supplemental” rather than Medicare Advantage and does not specify that the comparison concerns adjusted percentage increases, so its broader cost comparison is not established. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 1 · Cited by 94

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(3):465-75. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1359/jbmr.061113/pdf. Accessed December 19, 2010. · DOI
  2. Siris ES, Harris ST, Rosen CJ, et al. Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 U.S. claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81(8):1013-22. Available at: http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.com/ content/81/8/1013.full.pdf+html. Accessed December 19, 2010.
  3. Huybrechts KF, Ishak KJ, Caro JJ. Assessment of compliance with osteo- porosis treatment and its consequences in a managed care population. Bone. 2006;38(6):922-28.
  4. Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Huybrechts KF, Raggio G, Naujoks C. The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(12):1003-08. Available at: http://www.springerlink. com/content/0pt197p8l7rj6x66/fulltext.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2010.
  5. Weycker D, Macarios D, Edelsberg J, Oster G. Compliance with osteopo- rosis drug therapy and risk of fracture. Osteoporosis Int. 2007;18(3):271-77. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/content/1506136396014377/full- text.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2010.
  6. Manning WG, Mullahy J. Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform? J Health Econ. 2001;20(4):461-94.
  7. Penning-van Beest FJA, Erkens JA, Olson M, Herings RMC. Loss of treatment benefit due to low compliance with bisphosphonate therapy. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(4):511-17. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/ content/f488113404732q54/fulltext.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2010.
  8. Briesacher BA, Andrade SE, Yood RA, Kahler KH. Consequences of poor compliance with bisphosphonates. Bone. 2007;41(5):882-87.
  9. Rabenda V, Mertens R, Fabri V, et al. Adherence to bisphosphonates therapy and hip fracture risk in osteoporotic women. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(6):811-18. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/content/ h28m74068926w741/fulltext.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2010.
  10. Patrick AR, Brookhart MA, Losina E, et al. The complex relation between bisphosphonate adherence and fracture reduction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(7):3251-59.
  11. Kothawala P, Badamgarav E, Ryu S, Miller RM, Halbert RJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world adherence to drug therapy for osteo- porosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(12):1493-1501. Available at: http://www. mayoclinicproceedings.com/content/82/12/1493.full.pdf+html. Accessed December 19, 2010.
  12. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(5):487-97.
  13. Recker RR, Gallagher R, MacCosbe PE. Effect of dosing frequency on bisphosphonate medication adherence in a large longitudinal cohort of women. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(7):856-61. Available at: http://www.may- oclinicproceedings.com/content/80/7/856.full.pdf+html. Accessed December 19, 2010.
  14. van den Boogaard CH, Breekveldt-Postma NS, Borggreve SE, Goettsch WG, Herings RM. Persistent bisphosphonate use and the risk of osteoporotic fractures in clinical practice: a database analysis study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22(9):1757-64.
  15. McCombs JS, Thiebaud P, McLaughlin-Miley C, Shi J. Compliance with drug therapies for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Maturitas. 2004;48(3):271-87.
  16. Sunyecz JA, Mucha L, Baser O, Barr CE, Amonkar MM. Impact of com- pliance and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy on health care costs and utilization. Osteoporosis Int. 2008;19(10):1421-29. Available at: http:// www.springerlink.com/content/j157540wk4h67788/fulltext.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2010.
  17. Billig N, Ahmed SW, Kenmore PI. Approaches to senior care #1. Hip fracture, depression, and cognitive impairment: a follow-up study. Orthop Rev. 1988;17(3):315-20.
  18. Leech JA, Dulberg C, Kellie S, et al. Relationship of lung function to severity of osteoporosis in women. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;141(1):68-71.
  19. Colón-Emeric CS, Saag KG. Osteoporotic fractures in older adults. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006;20(4):695-706. Available at: http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1839833/pdf/nihms19273.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2010.
  20. Roche JJ, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG. Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ. 2005;331(7529):1374. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1309645/pdf/ bmj33101374.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2010.
  21. Christensen L, Iqbal S, Macarios D, Badamgarav E, Harley C. Cost of fractures associated with osteoporosis in a managed-care population. J Med Econ. 2010;13(2):302-13.
  22. Sikka R, Xia F, Aubert RE. Estimating medication persistency using administrative claims data. Am J Manag Care. 2005;11(7):449-57. Available at: http://www.ajmc.com/media/pdf/AJMC05julSIKKA_449to457.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2010.
  23. Andrade SE, Kahler KH, Frech F, Chan KA. Methods for evaluation of medication adherence and persistence using automated databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006;15(8):565-74.
  24. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defin- ing comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130-39. The Association of Adherence to Osteoporosis Therapies with Fracture, All-Cause Medical Costs, and All-Cause Hospitalizations: A Retrospective Claims Analysis of Female Health Plan Enrollees with Osteoporosis ICD-9-CM diagnosis 733.1, 733.10-733.16, 733.19, 805.0x, 805.2, 805.4, 805.6, 805.8, 808.0, 808.2, 808.4x, 808.8, 810.0x, 812.0x, 812.2x, 812.4x, 813, 813.0x, 813.2x, 813.4x, 813.8x, 820.0x, 820.2x, 820.8, 821.0x, 821.2x, 822.0, 823.0x, 823.2x, 823.8x, 824.0, 824.2, 824.4, 824.6, 824.

Metadata

Authors
Halpern, R., Iqbal, S. U., Kazis, L. E., Macarios, D., & Badamgarav, E.
Venue
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy
Published
2011-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
25-39
ISSN
  • 1083-4087 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-706X
OpenAlex
W2099600532
Cited by
94
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
osteoporosis, medication adherence, medication possession ratio, fracture risk, closed fractures, hospitalization, bisphosphonates, alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, raloxifene, women, Medicare Advantage, private insurance, health care costs, fracture prevention, corticosteroid use
MeSH terms
Costs and Cost Analysis, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Insurance Claim Review, Insurance, Health, Managed Care Programs, Osteoporosis, Retrospective Studies, United States, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Drug Costs, Health Care Costs, Medicare Part C, Bone Density Conservation Agents, Fractures, Bone, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review