Associations Between Statin Adherence Level, Health Care Costs, and Utilization
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence of the associations between statin adherence level, health care costs, and utilization is still limited. It is not clear whether better clinical outcomes derived from increasing statin adherence levels can be translated into cost savings and lower health care utilization. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the associations between statin adherence level, health care costs, hospital admission, and emergency room (ER) visits after statin therapy is taken for 1 year. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed to examine whether higher statin adherence level, measured as medication possession ratio (MPR), is associated with lower health care costs and hospital admission rate and with fewer ER visits. The study sample consisted of adult patients aged 18-64 years on an index date with continuous enrollment 12 months prior to and 12 months after the index date (the first fill date of a statin between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2010). Study subjects also needed to have a minimum of 2 ICD-9-CM diagnoses for hyperlipidemia or diabetes in the pre-index date period. Main data sources were medical and prescription (Rx) claims, as well as enrollment files provided by a health benefit program and a medical carrier of state government and public school employees in a midwestern state. Study subjects were stratified into 8 groups based on statin MPR level: less than 40%, 40%-59%, 60%-69%, 70%-79%, 80%-84%, 85%-89%, 90%-95%, and 96%-100%. Total medical and Rx costs, as well as all-cause hospital admission rates and ER visits in a year after the index date, were computed based on medical and Rx claims. A separate breakout of statin costs, part of total Rx costs, was also computed. Generalized linear models (GLMs) were developed to test the hypothesis that higher statin adherence levels are associated with lower health care costs and utilization. RESULTS: A total of 10,312 subjects met the criteria and were selected. The average statin MPR in a year after the index date was 71.95%. Mean total costs (medical + Rx) in a year after the index date were $6,064.36. There were significant variations in Rx costs and total health care costs as well as ER visits among the 8 patient groups stratified using the statin MPR level. A GLM model showed that all the ratios of health care costs among groups with statin MPR from 40%-59%, 60%-69%, 80%-84%, 85%-89%, 90%-95%, and 96%-100% were larger than 1 and statistically significant compared with the reference group with statin MPR less than 40%, suggesting those groups had higher health care costs than the reference group with the lowest statin MPR level. Based on a logistic regression model of hospital utilization for this study population, all the odds ratios of all-cause hospitalization among the groups with higher statin MPR were not statistically significant, suggesting that the likelihood of hospitalization for patients with higher statin MPR was not statistically lower than that of the reference group with statin MPR less than 40%. After controlling for all other covariates, another GLM model based on the Poisson distribution and log link function showed that ratios of ER visits among groups with statin MPR from 60%-69%, 80%-84%, 85%-89%, 90%-95%, and 96%-100% were smaller than 1 and statistically significant, suggesting the groups had fewer ER visits than the reference group with statin MPR less than 40%. The patient group with statin MPR from 96%-100% was estimated to have the lowest number of ER visits. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results show that much higher statin adherence levels are related to fewer ER visits after statin treatment is taken for a year among beneficiaries; however, the study is inconclusive whether higher statin adherence levels are associated with lower overall health care costs in a year after statin therapy is taken. Further research is needed to evaluate the associations between statin adherence level, the cost of cardiovascular care alone, and utilization over a longer period.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Zhao et al found that total healthcare costs were lower for the non-adherent population.
“While Zhao et al80 categorised participants into adherence subgroups, finding that total healthcare costs were lower for the non-adherent population.”
From Economic impact of medication non-adherence by disease groups: a systematic review (2018) · cites this paper as [80]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 24 · Cited by 23
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Evans CD, Eurich DT, Lamb DA, et al. Retrospective observational assess- ment of statin adherence among subjects patronizing different types of community pharmacies in Canada. J Manag Care Pharm. 2009;15(6):476-84. Available at: http://www.amcp.org/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=8181.
- Simpson RJ Jr, Mendys P. The effects of adherence and persistence on clinical outcomes in patients treated with statins: a systematic review. J Clin Lipidol. 2010;4(6):462-71.
- Ho PM, Magid DJ, Shetterly SM, et al. Medication nonadherence is asso- ciated with a broad range of adverse outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 2008;155(4):772-79.
- Watanabe JH, Bounthavong M, Chen T. Revisiting the medication posses- sion ratio threshold for adherence in lipid management. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013;29(3):175-80.
- Sokol MC, McGuigan KA, Verbrugge RR, Epstein RS. Impact of medi- cation adherence on hospitalization risk and healthcare cost. Med Care. 2005;43(6):521-30.
- Gleason PP, Qiu Y, Starner CI, Ritter S. Statin medication adherence association with hospitalizations or emergency room visits and total cost of care over two years. Poster presented at: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2012 Educational Conference; October 4, 2012;
- Wu J, Seiber E, Lacombe VA, Nahata MC, Balkrishnan R. Medical utili- zation and costs associated with statin adherence in Medicaid enrollees with type 2 diabetes. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45(3):342-49.
- Jackevicius CA, Mamdani M, Tu JV. Adherence with statin therapy in elderly patients with and without acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2002;288(4):462-67.
- Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defin- ing comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130-39.
- Ye X, Gross CR, Schommer J, Cline R, St Peter WL. Association between copayment and adherence to statin treatment initiated after coronary heart disease hospitalization: a longitudinal, retrospective, cohort study. Clin Ther. 2007;29(12):2748-57.
- Birnbaum HG, Shi L, Dial E, Oster EF, Greenberg PE, Mallett DA. Economic consequences of not recognizing bipolar disorder patients: a cross-sectional descriptive analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64(10):1201-09.
- Olfson M, Marcus SC, Druss B, Elinson L, Tanielian T, Pincus HA. National trends in the outpatient treatment of depression. JAMA. 2002;287(2):203-09.
- Dragomir A, Côté R, White M, et al. Relationship between adherence level to statins, clinical issues and health-care costs in real-life clinical set- ting. Value Health. 2010;13(1):87-94.
- Poluzzi E, Piccinni C, Carta P, et al. Cardiovascular events in statin recipients: impact of adherence to treatment in a 3-year record linkage study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;67(4):407-14.
- Benner, JS, Glynn RJ, Mogun H, Neumann PJ, Weinstein MC, Avorn J. Long-term persistence in use of statin therapy in elderly patients. JAMA. 2002;288(4):455-61.
- Mills EJ, Rachlis B, Wu P, Devereaux PJ, Arora P, Perri D. Primary preven- tion of cardiovascular mortality and events with statin treatments: a net- work meta-analysis involving more than 65,000 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(22):1769-81.
- O'Regan C, Wu P, Arora P, Perri D, Mills EJ. Statin therapy in stroke prevention: a meta-analysis involving 121,000 patients. Am J Med. 2008;121(1):24-33.
- Afilalo J, Duque G, Steele R, Jukema JW, de Craen AJ, Eisenberg MJ. Statins for secondary prevention in elderly patients: a hierarchical bayesian meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(1):37-45.
- Minder CM, Blaha MJ, Horne A, Michos ED, Kaul S, Blumenthal RS. Evidence-based use of statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular dis- ease. Am J Med. 2012;125(5):440-46.
- Amarenco P, Labreuche J. Lipid management in the prevention of stroke: review and updated meta-analysis of statins for stroke prevention. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(5):453-63.
- Authors
- Zhao, Y., Zabriski, S., & Bertram, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy
- Publisher
- Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 703-713
- ISSN
- 1083-4087 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-706X
- PMC
- PMC10438033
- OpenAlex
- W2287202989
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Keywords
- statin adherence, medication possession ratio, health care costs, health care utilization, hospitalization, emergency department visits, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, statin therapy, cost reduction, medication adherence, prescription drug costs, health insurance claims data, public school employees, state employees, Medicare, employer-sponsored health insurance
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Logistic Models, Health Care Costs, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Medication Adherence, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review