Cited by 24Treatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effectiveness and Value of Esketamine for the Management of Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Summary from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review’s Midwest Comparative Effectiveness Public Advisory Council

Open access
Agboola, Foluso, Atlas, Steven J., Touchette, Daniel R., Fazioli, Katherine, Pearson, Steven D.·2020·Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy

Abstract

DISCLOSURES: Funding for this summary was contributed by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, National Institute for Health Care Management, California Health Care Foundation, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan to the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), an independent organization that evaluates the evidence on the value of health care interventions. ICER's annual policy summit is supported by dues from Aetna, America's Health Insurance Plans, Anthem, AstraZeneca, Allergan, Alnylam, Biogen, Blue Shield of California, Cambia Health Services, CVS Caremark, Editas, Express Scripts, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Health Care Service Corporation, HealthPartners, HealthFirst, Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), Kaiser Permanente, LEO Pharma, Mallinkrodt Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novartis, National Pharmaceutical Council, Premera, Prime Therapeutics, Regeneron, Sanofi, Spark Therapeutics, and United Healthcare. Agboola, Fazioli, and Pearson are employed by ICER. Touchette reports grants from ICER during the course of this work and personal fees from Monument Analytics, unrelated to this work. Atlas has nothing to disclose.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.1.16

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2019, ICER issued a recommendation that deemed Spravato to deliver a low value for money according to their value-assessment framework.

    “In 2019, the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) issued a recommendation that deemed SpravatoⓇ to deliver a “low value for money” according to their value-assessment framework”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Lepine JP, 2011, Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 7, 3
  2. Ionescu DF, 2015, Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 17, 111, 10.31887/DCNS.2015.17.2/dionescu · DOI
  3. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17020239 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ochs-Ross R, 2019, Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 27, S139, 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.01.047 · DOI
  5. Daly EJ, JAMA Psychiatry

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Agboola, F., Atlas, S. J., Touchette, D. R., Fazioli, K., & Pearson, S. D.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Venue
Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
Published
2020-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
16-20
ISSN
  • 2376-0540 (ISSN-L)
  • 2376-1032
OpenAlex
W2998434856
Cited by
24
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
esketamine, treatment-resistant depression, antidepressant efficacy, economic evaluation, depression treatment
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adolescent, Adult, Aerosols, Affect, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Ketamine, Male, Middle Aged, Policy Making, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Drug Costs, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Medicine, Young Adult, Comparative Effectiveness Research, Patient Safety, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review