Cited by 11Medication Adherence and ComplianceDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

Adherence and Persistence with DPP-4 Inhibitors Versus Pioglitazone in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Claims Database Analysis

Open access
Gor, Deval, Lee, Todd A., Schumock, Glen T., Walton, Surrey M., Gerber, Ben S., Nutescu, Edith A., Touchette, Daniel R.·2020·Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adherence and persistence with diabetes medication play an important role in glycemic control and may differ by medication class. However, there is a lack of research comparing diabetes medications in patients with renal impairment, despite the challenges and higher burden associated with managing this population. OBJECTIVE: To compare adherence and persistence among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and nondialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors versus pioglitazone. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used Truven MarketScan administrative claims databases from 2009 to 2015. One-year adherence for patients with T2DM and nondialysis CKD who initiated therapy with either a DPP-4 inhibitor or pioglitazone was measured by proportion of days covered (PDC) following an initial dispensing, and PDC ≥ 0.80 was coded as adherent. Persistence was calculated as the days between the index date and last day with the index medication on hand, based on the end of the last days supply or the end of follow-up (i.e., 365 days), whichever occurred first. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate confounder-adjusted differences between the groups for adherence and persistence. RESULTS: The final cohort included 9,019 patients (DPP-4 inhibitors: 7,002; pioglitazone: 2,017). In the adjusted analysis, DPP-4 inhibitor users demonstrated a 1.41 (95% CI = 1.25-1.59) higher odds of being adherent compared with pioglitazone users. Overall adjusted HR for persistence was 0.74 (95% CI = 0.69-0.79), which favored DPP-4 inhibitors compared with pioglitazone. Relative to 2010, persistence with pioglitazone decreased in 2011-2012 and then increased in 2013-2014. In the subgroup analysis, DPP-4 inhibitors first had lower (2010: OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.70-0.87; 2011-2012: OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.54-0.66) and then similar (2013-2014: OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.88-1.19) hazards of nonpersistence compared with pioglitazone. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with T2DM and nondialysis CKD, the use of DPP-4 inhibitors was associated with better adherence compared with pioglitazone. However, following the approval of generic pioglitazone and associated lower cost sharing after 2012, the magnitude of difference in adherence between the medication classes reduced. Similarly, safety warnings in 2011 and approval of generic products in 2012 may have affected pioglitazone persistence, leading to first higher and then similar hazards for nonpersistence with pioglitazone as compared with DPP-4 inhibitors. These shifts in the results for pioglitazone warrant further investigation and close monitoring of the population initiating this medication. DISCLOSURES: No funding was received for this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. An abstract for this study was presented as a podium presentation at the International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) 2019 Annual Meeting; May 18-22, 2019; New Orleans, LA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.1.67

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a real-world AOM persistency analysis of 26,522 adults newly initiating therapy between April 2015 and March 2016, 41.8% who started liraglutide (Saxenda) were still on therapy at 6 months, and persistence was lower for non-GLP-1 weight loss pharmacotherapies (15.9% lorcaserin, 18.1% naltrexone/bupropion, 27.3% phentermine/topiramate).

    “In a real-world AOM persistency analysis of 26,522 adults newly initiating therapy between April 2015 and March 2016, only 41.8% who started liraglutide (Saxenda) were still on therapy at 6 months, whereas persistence was even lower for non-GLP-1 weight loss pharmacotherapies, with 15.9% for lorcaserin, 18.1% for naltrexone/bupropion, and 27.3% for phentermine/topiramate. 14”

    From Real-world persistence and adherence to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists among obese commercially insured adults without diabetes. (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 11

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]27. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA reviewing preliminary safety information on Actos (pioglitazone). Press release. September 17, 2010. Available at: https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170112032006/ http:/www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2010/ ucm226244.htm. Accessed November 18, 2019.

Authors
Gor, D., Lee, T. A., Schumock, G. T., Walton, S. M., Gerber, B. S., Nutescu, E. A., & Touchette, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Venue
Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
Published
2020-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
67-75
ISSN
  • 2376-0540 (ISSN-L)
  • 2376-1032
OpenAlex
W2998507523
Cited by
11
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
DPP-4 inhibitors, pioglitazone, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, medication adherence, treatment persistence, proportion of days covered, glycemic control, thiazolidinediones, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, antidiabetic drug utilization
MeSH terms
Administrative Claims, Healthcare, Pioglitazone, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Drug Utilization, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, United States, Drugs, Generic, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Risk Assessment, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors, Medication Adherence, Drug Substitution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review