The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Pharmacists as accessible health care providers: quantifying the opportunity
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Community pharmacists are well positioned to improve patient access to care, which may assist value-based care programs in reaching patients. While pharmacy accessibility is broadly acknowledged, much of the research supporting accessibility claims is poor quality. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the accessibility of pharmacists in comparison with physicians or qualified health care professionals (QHP) in a commercially insured population. METHODS: IBM MarketScan claims data from 2018 were used for this cross-sectional study. Beneficiaries included in the primary analysis were aged 18-64 years, enrolled with pharmacy benefits in 2018 for 12 months, and had at least 1 valid prescription drug claim or evaluation and management (E&M) code in 2018. Unique pharmacy visits were defined using a 6-day fill window for prescription fill dates, while visits to physicians or other QHP were defined as unique service dates tied to an E&M code. We assessed differences in visit frequency for the full sample, those with multiple chronic conditions (MCC), and “superutilizers” (top 5% based on total cost of care). Our statistical approach included descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon sign rank test. RESULTS: After applying the inclusion criteria, 11,720,958 beneficiaries were included in the full sample. The MCC cohort contained 13.8% of the total sample (mean [SD] age: 50.8 [10.8]; 908,880 [56.1%] female). Finally, the superutilizers were 57.3% female with an average age of 48.4 years and comprised 5.3% of the total sample. The median number of pharmacy and physician or QHP visits for the full sample were 5 and 3 (P < 0.0001), yielding a pharmacy to physician or QHP visit ratio of 1.7:1. The MCC cohort had a median of 13 pharmacy visits and 7 physician or QHP visits (ratio 1.9:1; P < 0.0001), and the superutilizers had a median of 14 pharmacy visits and 9 physician or QHP visits (ratio 1.6:1; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that patients visit their community pharmacies almost twice as often as they visit their physicians or other QHP. Study findings emphasize the accessibility of community pharmacists and highlight the role of community pharmacists in improving patient engagement in all care programs, including value-based care programs. DISCLOSURES: The database infrastructure used for this project was funded by the Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina (UNC) Gillings School of Global Public Health; the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC; the CER Strategic Initiative of UNC’s Clinical Translational Science Award (UL1TR001111); and the UNC School of Medicine. All authors are employed by the UNC School of Pharmacy. Urick declares consulting fees from Cardinal Health. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Portions of this work were previously presented at the AMCP 2021 Virtual, April 12-16, 2021.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“This education empowers patients to make informed decisions about their health [322].”
From Lifestyle Medicine for Obesity in the Era of Highly Effective Anti-Obesity Treatment (2025) · cites this paper as [322]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 180
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 10.2146/ajhp170025 · DOI
- 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003122 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023113 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMp1608511 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9518 · DOI
- 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.9.995 · DOI
- 10.3390/pharmacy7030106 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.12.016 · DOI
- Moose J, 2014, Pharmacy Times
- 10.1177/1715163517745517 · DOI
- Gebhart F, 2019, Drug Topics
- 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.6.703 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9132 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.06.004 · DOI
- 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.306 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Valliant, S. N., Burbage, S. C., Pathak, S., & Urick, B. Y.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Valliant, Samantha N
- Venue
- Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
- Publisher
- Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-90
- ISSN
- 2376-0540 (ISSN-L)
- 2376-1032
- PMC
- PMC8890748
- OpenAlex
- W4200571248
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 17.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002489)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Keywords
- community pharmacists, pharmacy accessibility, patient access to care, multimorbidity, value-based care, commercially insured adults, health care utilization
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Community Pharmacy Services, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Insurance, Health, Male, Middle Aged, Pharmacists, Databases, Factual, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacists as accessible health care providers: quantifying the opportunity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.1.85
- The paper
- Valliant, S. N., Burbage, S. C., Pathak, S., & Urick, B. Y. (2022). Pharmacists as accessible health care providers: quantifying the opportunity. Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy. https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.1.85