Cited by 180Pharmacy and Medical PracticesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesHealthcare Policy and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Pharmacists as accessible health care providers: quantifying the opportunity

Open access
Valliant, Samantha N, Burbage, Sabree C, Pathak, Shweta, Urick, Benjamin Y·2022·Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacists are well positioned to improve patient access to care, which may assist value-based care programs in reaching patients. While pharmacy accessibility is broadly acknowledged, much of the research supporting accessibility claims is poor quality. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the accessibility of pharmacists in comparison with physicians or qualified health care professionals (QHP) in a commercially insured population. METHODS: IBM MarketScan claims data from 2018 were used for this cross-sectional study. Beneficiaries included in the primary analysis were aged 18-64 years, enrolled with pharmacy benefits in 2018 for 12 months, and had at least 1 valid prescription drug claim or evaluation and management (E&M) code in 2018. Unique pharmacy visits were defined using a 6-day fill window for prescription fill dates, while visits to physicians or other QHP were defined as unique service dates tied to an E&M code. We assessed differences in visit frequency for the full sample, those with multiple chronic conditions (MCC), and “superutilizers” (top 5% based on total cost of care). Our statistical approach included descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon sign rank test. RESULTS: After applying the inclusion criteria, 11,720,958 beneficiaries were included in the full sample. The MCC cohort contained 13.8% of the total sample (mean [SD] age: 50.8 [10.8]; 908,880 [56.1%] female). Finally, the superutilizers were 57.3% female with an average age of 48.4 years and comprised 5.3% of the total sample. The median number of pharmacy and physician or QHP visits for the full sample were 5 and 3 (P < 0.0001), yielding a pharmacy to physician or QHP visit ratio of 1.7:1. The MCC cohort had a median of 13 pharmacy visits and 7 physician or QHP visits (ratio 1.9:1; P < 0.0001), and the superutilizers had a median of 14 pharmacy visits and 9 physician or QHP visits (ratio 1.6:1; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that patients visit their community pharmacies almost twice as often as they visit their physicians or other QHP. Study findings emphasize the accessibility of community pharmacists and highlight the role of community pharmacists in improving patient engagement in all care programs, including value-based care programs. DISCLOSURES: The database infrastructure used for this project was funded by the Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina (UNC) Gillings School of Global Public Health; the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC; the CER Strategic Initiative of UNC’s Clinical Translational Science Award (UL1TR001111); and the UNC School of Medicine. All authors are employed by the UNC School of Pharmacy. Urick declares consulting fees from Cardinal Health. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Portions of this work were previously presented at the AMCP 2021 Virtual, April 12-16, 2021.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.1.85

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 180

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.2146/ajhp170025 · DOI
  2. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003122 · DOI
  3. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023113 · DOI
  4. 10.1056/NEJMp1608511 · DOI
  5. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9518 · DOI
  6. 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.9.995 · DOI
  7. 10.3390/pharmacy7030106 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.12.016 · DOI
  9. Moose J, 2014, Pharmacy Times
  10. 10.1177/1715163517745517 · DOI
  11. Gebhart F, 2019, Drug Topics
  12. 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.6.703 · DOI
  13. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9132 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.06.004 · DOI
  15. 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.306 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Valliant, S. N., Burbage, S. C., Pathak, S., & Urick, B. Y.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Valliant, Samantha N
Venue
Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
Published
2022-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
85-90
ISSN
  • 2376-0540 (ISSN-L)
  • 2376-1032
OpenAlex
W4200571248
Cited by
180
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 5
FWCI
17.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002489)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
community pharmacists, pharmacy accessibility, patient access to care, multimorbidity, value-based care, commercially insured adults, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Community Pharmacy Services, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Insurance, Health, Male, Middle Aged, Pharmacists, Databases, Factual, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacists as accessible health care providers: quantifying the opportunity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.1.85
The paper
Valliant, S. N., Burbage, S. C., Pathak, S., & Urick, B. Y. (2022). Pharmacists as accessible health care providers: quantifying the opportunity. Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy. https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.1.85