The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Affordability and adherence gains for Medicare Part D low-income subsidy recipients when low-income subsidy benefits expanded in 2024
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The lowest-income beneficiaries enrolled in the Medicare Part D prescription drug program receive "full subsidies" that waive the premium and deductible and impose minimal copayments. Those with slightly higher incomes and assets may be eligible for "partial subsidies." Prior to 2024, individuals receiving partial subsidies faced reduced Part D premiums and deductibles and paid 15% coinsurance. Under provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, recipients of partial subsidies were upgraded to full subsidies beginning in 2024. The objective of this pilot study was to assess whether the new policy is likely to reduce cost-related nonadherence to prescribed medications- a common problem faced by older adults even among those receiving subsidies. OBJECTIVE: To compare cost-related nonadherence among partial- vs full-subsidy recipients with similar characteristics. METHODS: We used 2019 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data for the study. The Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey is uniquely suited for this work because it contains administrative data on low-income subsidy enrollment plus extensive survey-based information on financial resources necessary to establish program eligibility and rates of cost-related nonadherence. Explanatory variables included sociodemographic characteristics, economic resources, work status, and health variables. RESULTS: = 0.03). The differences were more pronounced for women and racial and ethnic minority groups in contrast to men and majority populations, respectively. Because the study samples were small, we could not conduct a detailed regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of cost-related nonadherence effects associated with partial-subsidy cost sharing suggests that the Inflation Reduction Act policy to expand low-income subsidies may boost medication adherence, most notably among women and racial and ethnic minority groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Stuart et al. (2024) found cost-related nonadherence was higher in partial-subsidy recipients (39%) than full-subsidy recipients (22%), with greater disparities in females and minorities [12].”
In the citing paper
“The Medicare Part D low-income subsidy, expanded under the Inflation Drug Reduction Act, has improved outcomes among women and racial/ethnic minorities.”
In the citing paper
“Stuart et al. (2024) found cost-related nonadherence was higher in partial-subsidy recipients (39%) than full-subsidy recipients (22%), with greater disparities in females and minorities [12].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Patient Adherence and Medical Treatment Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis
Robin DiMatteo, M., Giordani, P. J., Lepper, H. S., & Croghan, T. W. (2002) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200209000-00009 · Cited by 1,490
Qiao, Y., Tsang, C. C. S., Hohmeier, K. C., Dougherty, S., Hines, L. E., Chiyaka, E. T., & Wang, J. (2020) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2020.06.005 · Cited by 26
A Policy Option to Enhance Access and Affordability for Medicare’s Low-Income Beneficiaries
Schoen, C., Davis, K. C., Willink, A., & Buttorff, C. (2018) · PubMed · doi:10.26099/q2sk-vp82 · Cited by 14
Awareness of the Medicare Part D Low-Income Subsidy among Older non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics
Bakk, L., & Cadet, T. J. (2018) · Social Work in Public Health · doi:10.1080/19371918.2018.1462285 · Cited by 9
Loh, F. E., Stuart, B., Hunt, R. J., & Negari, M. (2024) · Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy · doi:10.18553/jmcp.2024.23174 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mehany, O., Artner, A., Sebők, S., Hankó, B., & Zelkó, R. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm15052069 · Cited by 6
Петровна, К. Е., Lukina, Y. V., Кутишенко, Н. П., Zeynapur, A. A., Martsevich, S. Y., Pestova, N. V., Eliseykina, A. S., & Drapkina, O. M. (2026) · Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology · doi:10.20996/1819-6446-2026-3354 · Cited by 5
Emerging trends in pharmaceutical payment models: Perspectives on the 2024 AMCP Foundation Survey
Kenney, J. T., & Gleason, P. P. (2025) · Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy · doi:10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.1-b.s20 · Cited by 2
Advancing the conversation: 30 years of scholarship in managed care pharmacy
Happe, L. E. (2025) · Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy · doi:10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.7.617
Metadata
- Authors
- Stuart, B. C., Loh, F. E., & Dougherty, J. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Touro College (US)
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (US)
- Corresponding author
- Loh, F. Ellen
- Venue
- Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
- Publisher
- Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
- Published
- 2024-07
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 728-735
- ISSN
- 2376-0540 (ISSN-L)
- 2376-1032
- PMC
- PMC11217861
- OpenAlex
- W4400186315
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Touro Scholar (Touro College) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
- Keywords
- Medicare Part D, low-income subsidy, cost-related nonadherence, medication adherence, Inflation Reduction Act, prescription drug coverage, cost sharing, racial and ethnic minorities, women, older adults
- MeSH terms
- Assessment of Medication Adherence, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Deductibles and Coinsurance, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Poverty, United States, Drug Monitoring, Medicare Part D, Medication Adherence, Prescription Drugs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review