Cited by 8Diabetes Treatment and ManagementHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeDiabetes Management and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patterns and costs associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use in US adults with type 2 diabetes

Open access
Wu, Jun, Perez, Alexandra, Sullivan, Patrick W.·2025·Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) offer cardiorenal benefits in diabetes management. Since 2020, public awareness of GLP-1 RAs for diabetes, weight loss, and the prevention of cardiovascular disease has led to a surge in their utilization. However, the high cost of GLP-1 RAs and limitations in insurance coverage have been considered significant barriers to access. Current knowledge regarding how GLP-1 RA use affects total health care costs in diabetes care after 2020 in the United States remains limited. Consequently, further research is needed to examine the financial burden of GLP-1 RA use on patients and payers, as well as its overall impact on total health care costs at the national level. OBJECTIVE: To examine GLP-1 RA utilization and association with health care costs among US adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Using data from the 2021-2022 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, the study sample included individuals (aged ≥18 years) with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Outcomes included GLP-1 RA use and all-cause and diabetes-related health care costs, including medical and prescription drug costs paid by patients and insurers. Generalized linear regression with a log link and gamma distribution was used to assess the effect of GLP-1 RA use on health care costs, adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. RESULTS: Among 3,587 eligible adults with type 2 diabetes, 637 (18.8%) used GLP-1 RAs, representing an estimated 3.66 million US adults-a marked increase compared with pre-2020 estimates of less than 10%. Fewer older adults (aged ≥65 years) used GLP-1 RAs (35.1%) compared with adults aged 45-64 years (50.6%). The average annual per-person cost of GLP-1 RA was $6,947. Although insurance covered more than 95% of GLP-1 RA cost, these medications represented a substantial proportion of diabetes care costs: 63.3% of antidiabetic drug costs and 55.7% of total diabetes-related costs among GLP-1 RA users. After adjustment, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a 219% increase in diabetes-related costs and a 55.3% increase in total all-cause health care costs. CONCLUSIONS: GLP-1 RA utilization among US adults with type 2 diabetes has substantially increased, with use in 2021-2022 nearly double that of the period prior to 2020. The higher health care costs associated with taking GLP-1 RAs were largely attributable to high drug costs, of which over 95% were covered by insurance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1029

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Tran KL, 2017, Am Health Drug Benefits, 10, 178
  2. Elsayed NA, 2025, Diabetes Care, 48, S181
  3. Plodkowski R, 2017, Am Health Drug Benefits, 10, 187
  4. Elsayed NA, 2025, Diabetes Care, 48, S266

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Wu, J., Perez, A., & Sullivan, P. W.
Affiliations
  • Nova Southeastern University (US)
  • Department of Sociobehavioral and Administrative Pharmacy, Barry and Judy Silverman College of Pharmacy, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL
Venue
Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
Published
2025-10
Volume
31
Issue
10
Pages
1029-1038
ISSN
  • 2376-0540 (ISSN-L)
  • 2376-1032
OpenAlex
W4414563985
Cited by
7
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 7
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, type 2 diabetes, health care costs, medication utilization, prescription drug costs, insurance coverage, out-of-pocket costs, antidiabetic drugs, older adults, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, weight loss, cardiovascular disease prevention, access barriers, United States adults
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Health Expenditures, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Drug Costs, Health Care Costs, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review