Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 46Multi-Agent Systems and NegotiationPsychiatry, Mental Health, NeuroscienceEmotion and Mood Recognition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emotion Modeling in Social Simulation: A Survey

Open access
Bourgais, Mathieu, Taillandier, Patrick, Vercouter, Laurent, Adam, Carole·2018·Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation

Abstract

Emotions play a key role in human behavior.Being able to integrate them in models is therefore a major issue to improve the believability of agent-based social simulations.However, and despite the emergence of many emotional models usable for simulations in the last few years, many modelers still tend to use too simple ad hoc emotional models.To support this view, this article proposes a survey of the different practices of modelers in terms of implementations of emotional models, as well as a presentation of different emotional architectures that already exist and that could be used by modelers.The main goal is to understand how emotions are used today in social simulations, in order for the community to unify its uses of emotional agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18564/jasss.3681

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Schema of the OCC model taken from Ortony et al. (1988) (p. 19)
Figure 1 Schema of the OCC model taken from Ortony et al. (1988) (p. 19)CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Schema of the DETT architecture taken from Van Dyke Parunak et al. (2006) (p.3)
Figure 2 Schema of the DETT architecture taken from Van Dyke Parunak et al. (2006) (p.3)CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Schema of the PMFserv architecture taken from Silverman et al. (2006b) (p.7)
Figure 3 Schema of the PMFserv architecture taken from Silverman et al. (2006b) (p.7)CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 Schema of the EMA architecture taken from Gratch & Marsella (2004a) (p.278)
Figure 4 Schema of the EMA architecture taken from Gratch & Marsella (2004a) (p.278)CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 Schema of the eBDI architecture taken from Jiang et al. (2007) (p.10)
Figure 5 Schema of the eBDI architecture taken from Jiang et al. (2007) (p.10)CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 6 Schema of the architecture taken from Bourgais et al. (2016) (p.6)
Figure 6 Schema of the architecture taken from Bourgais et al. (2016) (p.6)CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Adam, C. ( ). Emotions: From Psychological Theories to Logical Formalization and Implementation in a BDI Agent. Phd thesis, INP Toulouse
  2. Balke, T. & Gilbert, N. ( ). How do agents make decisions? A survey. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, ( ),
  3. Bates, J. ( ). The role of emotion in believable agents. Communications of the ACM, ( ), - Bechara, A. ( ). The role of emotion in decision-making: Evidence from neurological patients with or- bitofrontal damage. Brain and Cognition, ( ), - Bourgais, M., Taillandier, P. & Vercouter, L. ( ). An agent architecture coupling cognition and emotions for simulation of complex systems. Paper presented at Social Simulation Conference
  4. Bousquet, F., Bakam, I., Proton, H. & Le Page, C. ( ). Cormas: common-pool resources and multi-agent systems. In International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, (pp. -). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer
  5. Bratman, M. ( ). Intentions, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  6. Brousmiche, K.-L., Kant, J.-D., Sabouret, N. & Prenot-Guinard, F. ( ). From beliefs to attitudes: Polias, a model of attitude dynamics based on cognitive modeling and field data. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, ( ),
  7. Cannon, W. B. ( ). The James-Lange theory of emotions: A critical examination and an alternative theory. The American Journal of Psychology, ( / ), -
  8. Dias, J. & Paiva, A. ( ). I want to be your friend: Establishing relations with emotionally intelligent agents. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, (pp.
  9. - ). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems El Jed Mehdi, P. N., Dugdale, J. & Pavard, B. ( ). Modelling character emotion in an interactive virtual envi- ronment. In AISB Convention, Symposium on Language, Speech and Gesture for Expressive Characters
  10. Faroqi, H. & Mesgari, M.-S. ( ). Agent-based crowd simulation considering emotion contagion for emergency evacuation problem. Geomatics, Centre of GIS Excellency, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P. & Ter Schure, E. ( ). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, ( ),
  11. Frijda, N. H. & Mesquita, B. ( ). The social roles and functions of emotions. In S. Kitayama & H. R. Markus (Eds.), Emotion and Culture: Empirical Studies of Mutual Influence. American Psychological Association
  12. Gratch, J. & Marsella, S. ( b). Evaluating a general model of emotional appraisal and coping. In AAAI Sym- posium on Architectures for Modeling Emotion: Cross-Disciplinary Foundations, Palo Alto, CA
  13. Grignard, A., Taillandier, P., Gaudou, B., Vo, D. A., Huynh, N. Q. & Drogoul, A. ( ). Gama . : Advancing the art of complex agent-based modeling and simulation. In International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems, (pp. -). Springer: Berlin/ Heidelberg
  14. Henninger, A. E., Jones, R. M. & Chown, E. ( ). Behaviors that emerge from emotion and cognition: imple- mentation and evaluation of a symbolic-connectionist architecture. In Proceedings of the Second Interna- tional Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, (pp. - ). ACM
  15. Hunter, E., Mac Namee, B., Kelleher, J. et al. ( ). A taxonomy for agent-based models in human infectious disease epidemiology. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, ( ), - JASSS, ( ) , http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/ / / .html Doi: . /jasss.
  16. Jager, W. ( ). Enhancing the realism of simulation (EROS): On implementing and developing psychological theory in social simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, ( ),
  17. Jiang, H., Vidal, J. M. & Huhns, M. N. ( ). EBDI: an architecture for emotional agents. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, (p. ). ACM
  18. Jones, H., Saunier, J. & Lourdeaux, D. ( ). Personality, emotions and physiology in a BDI agent architec- ture: The PEP-> BDI model. In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology-Volume , (pp. - ). IEEE Computer Society
  19. Jones, H., Saunier, J. & Lourdeaux, D. ( ). Fuzzy rules for events perception and emotions in an agent archi- tecture. In EUSFLAT Conference, (pp.
  20. Le, V. M., Adam, C., Canal, R., Gaudou, B., Vinh, H. T., Taillandier, P. et al. ( ). Simulation of the emotion dynamics in a group of agents in an evacuation situation. In Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems, (pp. -). Berlin/Heildeberg: Springer
  21. Luo, L., Zhou, S., Cai, W., Low, M. Y. H., Tian, F., Wang, Y., Xiao, X. & Chen, D. ( ). Agent-based human behavior modeling for crowd simulation. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, ( -), - Marreiros, G., Santos, R., Ramos, C. & Neves, J. ( ). Context-aware emotion-based model for group decision making. IEEE Intelligent Systems, ( ), -
  22. Nair, R., Tambe, M. & Marsella, S. ( ). The role of emotions in multiagent teamwork. In J.-M. Fellous & M. Arbib (Eds.), Who Needs Emotions: The Brain Meets the Robot, (pp. -). Oxford: Oxford University Press
  23. Nguyen, V. T., Longin, D., Ho, T. V. & Gaudou, B. ( ). Integration of emotion in evacuation simulation. In C. Hanachi, F. Bénaben & F. Charoy (Eds.), Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management in Mediter- ranean Countries: First International Conference, ISCRAM-med , Toulouse, France, October -, . Pro- ceedings. Cham: Springer International Publishing
  24. North, M. J., Howe, T. R., Collier, N. T. & Vos, J. R. ( ). The Repast Simphony runtime system. In Agent Conference on Generative Social Processes, Models, and Mechanisms. Argonne, Illinois, USA: Argonne National Laboratory.
  25. Ochs, M., Sabouret, N. & Corruble, V. ( ). Simulation of the dynamics of nonplayer characters' emotions and social relations in games. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games
  26. Oliveira, E. & Sarmento, L. ( ). Emotional advantage for adaptability and autonomy. In Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, (pp. -). ACM
  27. Ortony, A. ( ). On making believable emotional agents believable. In R. Trappl, P. Petta & S. Payr (Eds.), Emotions in Humans and Artifacts, (pp. -). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  28. Ortony, A., Clore, G. L. & Collins, A. ( ). The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  29. Russell, J. A. & Mehrabian, A. ( ). Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions. Journal of Research in Personality, ( ), -
  30. Schachter, S. & Singer, J. ( ). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psycho- logical Review, ( ),
  31. Scherer, K. R., Scherer, K. R. & Ekman, P. ( ). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. Approaches to Emotion, , Schweitzer, F. & Garcia, D. ( ). An agent-based model of collective emotions in online communities. The European Physical Journal B, ( ), - Seger, C. R., Smith, E. R. & Mackie, D. M. ( ). Subtle activation of a social categorization triggers group-level emotions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, ( ), -
  32. Silverman, B. G., Bharathy, G., O'Brien, K. & Cornwell, J. ( a). Human Behavior Models for Agents in Simulators and Games: Part II: Gamebot Engineering with PMFserv. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  33. Smith, C. A. & Lazarus, R. S. ( ). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Guilford Press
  34. Smith, E. R., Seger, C. R. & Mackie, D. M. ( ). Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, ( ),
  35. Sun, R. ( ). Cognitive social simulation incorporating cognitive architectures. IEEE Intelligent Systems, ( ), - Šuvakov, M., Garcia, D., Schweitzer, F. & Tadić, B. ( ). Agent-based simulations of emotion spreading in online social networks. arXiv preprint arXiv: .
  36. Ta, X. H., Gaudou, B., Longin, D., Amouroux, E. & Ho, T. V. ( ). Emotion in the evacuation process: Formal model and simulation. In Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Information and Communication Tech- nology, SoICT ' , (pp. -). ACM
  37. Tsai, J., Fridman, N., Bowring, E., Brown, M., Epstein, S., Kaminka, G., Marsella, S., Ogden, A., Rika, I., Sheel, A. et al. ( ). Escapes: evacuation simulation with children, authorities, parents, emotions, and social com- parison. In The th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume , (pp.
  38. - ). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems Van Dyke Parunak, H., Bisson, R., Brueckner, S., Matthews, R. & Sauter, J. ( ). A model of emotions for situ- ated agents. In Proceedings of the Fi h International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, (pp. - ). ACM
  39. van Ruijven, T. ( ). Serious games as experiments for emergency management research: A review. In ISCRAM : Proceedings of the th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Manage- ment, Lisbon, Portugal, -May .
  40. Zoumpoulaki, A., Avradinis, N. & Vosinakis, S. ( ). A multi-agent simulation framework for emergency evac- uations incorporating personality and emotions. In Artificial Intelligence: Theories, Models and Applications, (pp. - ). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bourgais, M., Taillandier, P., Vercouter, L., & Adam, C.
Affiliations
  • Laboratoire d'Informatique, du Traitement de l'Information et des Systèmes (FR)
  • Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (FR)
  • Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble (FR)
Venue
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
Published
2018
Volume
21
Issue
2
ISSN
1460-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794810572
Cited by
46
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-14-CE22-0002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
emotion modeling, emotional agents, agent-based social simulation, emotional architecture, agent believability, human behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review