Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 64Sports, Gender, and SocietyMartial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and EducationGender and Feminist Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Pink Gloves Still Give Black Eyes: Exploring ‘Alternative’ Femininity in Women’s Combat Sports

Open access
Channon, Alex, Phipps, Catherine·2017·Martial Arts Studies

Abstract

This article considers the gendered significance of women’s participation in combat sports, with a specific focus on the performances of femininity by female combat athletes. Against lines of argument which posit that women’s enactment of femininity is the result of restrictive, coercive, and ultimately conservative cultural pressures, respondents in two separate studies suggested that a purposeful, selective enactment of femininity, when understood in combination with their fighting ability, signified an important challenge to orthodox understandings of gender. As such, our data suggests that manoeuvring within normative cultural parameters of gender may, ironically, help to stimulate change in its structure of meanings, given that the feminine performances of these fighters ultimately posed symbolic challenges to cultural constructions of (‘normal’) women as inevitably weaker and inferior athletes compared to men. We therefore advocate that scholars with an interest in exploring the subversion of gender remain mindful of the possibility that such subversive impulses might occur via the appropriation, and re-signification, of some of its more orthodox norms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18573/j.2017.10093

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 59 · Cited by 64

Metadata

Authors
Channon, A., & Phipps, C.
Affiliations
University of Greenwich (GB)
Corresponding author
Phipps, Catherine
Venue
Martial Arts Studies
Published
2017-01-16
Volume
0
Issue
3
Pages
24
ISSN
2057-5696 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2574452015
Cited by
64
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
15.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Martial Arts Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Solent University Research Portal (Solent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/N00292X/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Martial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
femininity, gender performance, gender norms, female athletes, gender-based violence, women's sports

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pink Gloves Still Give Black Eyes: Exploring ‘Alternative’ Femininity in Women’s Combat Sports. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18573/j.2017.10093
The paper
Channon, A., & Phipps, C. (2017). Pink Gloves Still Give Black Eyes: Exploring ‘Alternative’ Femininity in Women’s Combat Sports. Martial Arts Studies. https://doi.org/10.18573/j.2017.10093

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.