The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Pink Gloves Still Give Black Eyes: Exploring ‘Alternative’ Femininity in Women’s Combat Sports
Open accessAbstract
This article considers the gendered significance of women’s participation in combat sports, with a specific focus on the performances of femininity by female combat athletes. Against lines of argument which posit that women’s enactment of femininity is the result of restrictive, coercive, and ultimately conservative cultural pressures, respondents in two separate studies suggested that a purposeful, selective enactment of femininity, when understood in combination with their fighting ability, signified an important challenge to orthodox understandings of gender. As such, our data suggests that manoeuvring within normative cultural parameters of gender may, ironically, help to stimulate change in its structure of meanings, given that the feminine performances of these fighters ultimately posed symbolic challenges to cultural constructions of (‘normal’) women as inevitably weaker and inferior athletes compared to men. We therefore advocate that scholars with an interest in exploring the subversion of gender remain mindful of the possibility that such subversive impulses might occur via the appropriation, and re-signification, of some of its more orthodox norms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similar studies suggest that a passion for sport can foster feelings of strength and joy for girls and women (Channon and Phipps 2017; Hovden 2004; Lenskyj 1986) by 'providing a space in which girls and women can experience empowerment, excitement, [and] freedom and challenge stereotyped notions of femininity' (Tjønndal 2019, p. 459).”
From Loving the Sport, Loving the Self: Devotion and Defiance in Furia (2024) · cites this paper as Channon and Phipps 2017
Citations
The citation lists are queued
They are fetched later and appear here then.
References 59 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Channon, A., & Phipps, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Greenwich (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Phipps, Catherine
- Venue
- Martial Arts Studies
- Publisher
- Cardiff University Press
- Published
- 2017-01-16
- Volume
- 0
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 24
- ISSN
- 2057-5696 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2574452015
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 15.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Martial Arts Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
- University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Solent University Research Portal (Solent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/N00292X/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Martial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- femininity, gender performance, gender norms, female athletes, gender-based violence, women's sports
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pink Gloves Still Give Black Eyes: Exploring ‘Alternative’ Femininity in Women’s Combat Sports. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18573/j.2017.10093
- The paper
- Channon, A., & Phipps, C. (2017). Pink Gloves Still Give Black Eyes: Exploring ‘Alternative’ Femininity in Women’s Combat Sports. Martial Arts Studies. https://doi.org/10.18573/j.2017.10093
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.