The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Varieties of Suicidal Experience: A New Theory of Suicidal Violence
Abstract
Argues that a range of behaviors such as murder-suicide, terrorism, and mass shootings are better understood as motivated by suicidal impulses than by homicidal ones Mass shooters often display behaviors that strongly mirror the warning signs for suicide: lives led in isolation, intense personal suffering, disaffection, and struggle. Letters detailing why they did what they did paint pictures of intense misery and loneliness. As this book makes clear, private despair sometimes leads to social violence. In this groundbreaking work, Thomas Joiner offers a unified theory of suicide, making the case that many acts that appear homicidal are best understood primarily as suicidal. We must recognize that there are several forms of suicidal violence, some of which masquerade as other types of acts, including terrorism and murder. These include suicide-by-cop, suicide terrorism, murder-suicide, and running amok. Though there are obvious differences among these acts, Joiner argues that framing them as stemming from a common ideology of suicide is a crucial step in preventing these atrocities. By recognizing the desire to die—not to kill—as being at the heart of many of the acts of those who choose to kill their partner, shoot up their school, or terrorize their community, we can offer more effective measures of intervention. At a time when our nation is scrambling for solutions in the fight to end gun violence, this book presents a crucial component in the detection and treatment of unwell individuals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Suicidal individuals in the transition phase describe an all-embracing “focus on death” (31, 35, 67); to outsiders, the suicidal person may appear “zombie-like” rather than emotionally agitated (68), a “thousand yards stare” (69) seems to characterize some.”
From Ambivalence model of suicidality [ABS-model]: an orientation model for the treatment of suicidal individuals (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teismann, T., Britton, P. C., & Forkmann, T. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1449565 · Cited by 9
Associations between gun violence exposure and suicide mortality rates in US counties
Christopoulos, K. (2024) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-024-02771-6 · Cited by 3
Schiffer, A. A., & Saucier, D. A. (2024) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2024.43.5.407 · Cited by 2
Theorien der Suizidalität und die Rolle psychischer Störungen
Michalak, J., & Teismann, T. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-72796-6_2
Bagajan, K. Q., Asgari, Z., Khanpayeh, M., Freund, J., Teismann, T., & Hensel, L. M. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1852185 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Joiner, T.
- Corresponding author
- Joiner, Thomas
- ORCID
- Joiner, Thomas
- Venue
- New York University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- New York University Press
- Published
- 2024-01-19
- OpenAlex
- W4391695105
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New York University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Keywords
- homicide-suicide, suicide terrorism, suicide by cop, mass shootings, terrorism, gun violence, suicidal impulse, suicide prevention, social violence, personal suffering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review