The DOI matches its Crossref record.
5. Legal and Social Work Responses to the Detained and Deported: Interdisciplinary Reflections and Actions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some legal service organizations work with social work or related fields to offer medical case support, housing advocacy, social services, therapeutic referrals, and a more person-centered approach.
“Some legal service organizations collaborate with social work or complimentary disciplines for support in medical cases, housing advocacy, social services, therapeutic referrals, and a more person-centered approach that accommodates the complexity of clients both within and outside the legal case (Androff, 2016a; Chicco & Congress, 2015).”
From Human Rights–Based Social Work Practice with Immigrants and Asylum Seekers in a Legal Service Organization (2021) · cites this paper as Chicco & Congress, 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Androff, D., & Mathis, C. (2021) · Journal of Human Rights and Social Work · doi:10.1007/s41134-021-00197-7 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Chicco, J., & Congress, E. P.
- Venue
- The New Deportations Delirium
- Publisher
- New York University Press
- Published
- 2015-12-31
- Pages
- 147-166
- OpenAlex
- W4393292888
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New York University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Immigration Law and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Law › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
- Keywords
- immigration detention, deportation, legal responses, social work response, immigration law, interdisciplinary perspectives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
