The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Returning to Netukulimk: Mi’kmaq cultural and spiritual connections with resource stewardship and self-governance
Open accessAbstract
Recent global initiatives such as the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples have brought the issues facing and needs of indigenous peoples to the forefront of international attention. While underscoring respect for traditional practices, these initiatives have yet to appreciate fully the extent to which indigenous peoples’ practices engage ways of being, living and believing that encompass a holistic understanding of the relations between humans and all facets of their ecosystem. The Mi’kmaq, the indigenous people of Maritime Canada, capture and express their holistic understanding through the concept of Netukulimk. In this essay we review core attributes of Netukulimk. We also review key moments in the colonialization assault on Netukulimk as a primary means for subordinating and marginalizing the Mi’kmaq. We close the essay with an overview and discussion of recent developments wherein the Mi’kmaq are working to revitalize the place of Netukulimk in treaty-based rights and Mi’kmaq law-ways, particularly within self-governance and resource stewardship initiatives. The Mi’kmaq experiences provide insights regarding the challenges and requirements for achieving respect for traditional practices as key to affirming the rights of indigenous peoples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It shares with the above frameworks the notion of working collaboratively across knowledge systems on a common problem (Berkes, 2018), and as with the Double-Canoe, it centres on a cultural conservation concept that of Netukulimk where ecological integrity is maintained for the next seven generations (Prosper et al., 2011).”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Prosper et al., 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Netukulimk implores one to uphold their responsibilities to future generations (Prosper et al., 2011); much like the early conceptual space of conservation biology (Soulé, 1985) but with emphasis here on responsibility to the place from which the knowledge emerges.”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Prosper et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- Asch, M. (Ed). (1997). Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in Canada: Essays on law, equality and respect for difference. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
- Bailey, A. A. (1937[1969]). The conflict of European and Eastern Algonkian cultures 1504-1700. A study in Canadian civilization. Toronto: University Of Toronto Press.
- Barsh, R. L. (2002). Netukulimk past and present: Miqmaw ethics and the Atlantic fishery. Journal of Canadian Studies, 37(1), 15-38.
- Bourne, E. G. (Ed.). (2000). Algonquains, Hurons and Iroquois: Champlain explores America,1603-1616. (
- A.N. Bourne Trans.). Dartmouth: Brook House Press.
- Burrows, K. C. (2003). Nova Scotia through the trees: 1761-1930. Wellington: Terra Firma Press.
- Frank G. Speck's contributions to the understanding of Mi'kmaq land use, leadership, and land management. Ethnohistory, 46(3), 481-540.
- Coates, K. (2000). The Marshall decision and Native rights. Montreal and Ithica: McGill-Queen's University Press.
- Hoffman, B. (1955). Historical ethnography of the Micmac of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. (Doctoral dissertation). Berekley: University of California.
- Inglis, S., Mannette, J., & Sulewski, S., (Eds.). (1991). Paqtatek: Volume 1 policy and consciousness in Mi'kmaq life. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Garamond Press.
- Jorgensen, M. (Ed.). (2007). Rebuilding Native nations: Strategies for governance and development. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
- Marshall, D., Alexander, D., & Marshall, S., (1989). The Mi'kmaq Covenant Chain. In B. Richardson (Ed.), Drumbeat: Anger and renewal in Indian country. Toronto: Summerhill Press.
- Martin, C. (1978). Keepers of the game: Indian-animal relationships and the fur trade. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
- McMillan, L. (1997). Mi'kmawey Mawio'mi: Changing roles of the Mi'kmaq Grand Council from the early seventeenth century to the present (Master's thesis). Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
- McMillan, L. (2003). Koqqwaja'ltimk: Mi'kmaq legal consciousness (Doctoral dissertation). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
- McMillan, L. (2011). Colonial traditions, cooptations, and Mi'kmaq legal consciousness. Law and Social Inquiry Journal of the American Bar Foundation, 36,(1), 171-200.
- McMillan, L. J., & Davis, A. (2010). What does this tell us about us? Social research and indigenous peoples -the case of the Paq'tnkek Mi'kmaq. Traditional Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Information Bulletin, 27, 3-16.
- Miller, V. (1976). Aboriginal Micmac population: A review of the evidence. Ethnohistory, 23(2), 117-127.
- Nadasday, P. (2003). Hunters and bureaucrats: Power, knowledge and Aboriginal -State relations in the Southwest Yukon. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
- Napoleon, V. (2005). Delgamuukw: A legal straightjacket for oral histories? Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 20(2), 123-155.
- Newman, D. ( 2009). The duty to consult: New relationships with Aboriginal peoples. Saskatoon: Purich Press.
- Paul, D. N. (2000). We were not the savages: A Mi'kmaq perspective on the collision between European and Native American Civilizations (NEW Twenty-First Century Edition). Halifax: Fernwood Publishing Co.
- Prosper, K. (2009). Netukulimk: A circular relationship in shifting ideologies: An investigation into the altered and realigned spiritual and cultural connection shared by moose and Mi'kmaq (Honours anthropology thesis).
- Richardson, B. (Ed.) (1989). Drumbeat: Anger and renewal in Indian Country. Toronto: Summerhill Press.
- Robinson, A. (2004). Ta'n Teliktlamsitasit (ways of believing): Mi'kmaw religion in Eskasoni, Nova Scotia. Toronto: Pearson Education.
- Snow, D. R. (1968). Wabanaki "family hunting territories". American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1143-1151.
- Tanner, A. (Ed.). (1983). Introduction: Canadian Indians and the politics of dependency, the politics of Indianness: Case studies in Native Canada (pp. 1-35). Newfoundland: St. John's, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Memorial University of Newfoundland.
- Thwaites, R. (Ed.). (1898). The Jesuit relations and allied documents (Vols. 1 -3). Cleveland: Burrow Brothers.
- Upton, L. F. S. (1979). Micmacs and Colonists, Indian-White relations in the Maritimes 1713-1813. Vancouver,BC: University of British Colombia Press.
- Warry, W. (2007). Ending denial: Understanding Aboriginal issues. New York: Broad View Press.
- Wicken, W. (2002). Mi'kmaq treaties on trial; History, land and Donald Marshall Junior. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
- Wolf, E. (1982). Europe and the people without history. Berkley: University of California Press. Cases Cited: Delgamuukw v. British Columbia, [1997]
Cited by
“Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management
Reid, A. J., Eckert, L. E., Lane, J., Young, N., Hinch, S. G., Darimont, C. T., Cooke, S. J., Ban, N. C., & Marshall, A. (2021) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12516 · Cited by 652
“…the notion of working collaboratively across knowledge systems on a common problem (Berkes, 2018), and as with the Double-Canoe, it centres on a cultural conservation concept that of Netukulimk where ecological integrity is maintained for the next seven generations (Prosper et al., 2011).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Prosper, K., McMillan, L. J., Davis, A. A., & Moffitt, M.
- Affiliations
- St. Francis Xavier University (CA)
- Mount Saint Vincent University (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Venue
- International Indigenous Policy Journal
- Published
- 2011-10-21
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1916-5781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149142527
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 8.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Indigenous Policy Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- St. Francis Xavier University
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (18584)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Keywords
- Mi'kmaq, indigenous self-government, indigenous law, colonialism, UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, traditional practices, indigenous spirituality, human-nature relationship, Maritime Canada
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
