Rapamycin transiently induces mitochondrial remodeling to reprogram energy metabolism in old hearts
Open accessAbstract
Rapamycin, an inhibitor of mTOR signaling, has been shown to reverse diastolic dysfunction in old mice in 10 weeks, highlighting its therapeutic potential for a poorly treatable condition. However, the mechanisms and temporal regulation of its cardiac benefits remain unclear. We show that improved diastolic function in old mice begins at 2-4 weeks, progressing over the course of 10-week treatment. While TORC1-mediated S6 phosphorylation and TORC2 mediated AKT and PKCα phosphorylation are inhibited throughout the course of treatment, rapamycin inhibits ULK phosphorylation and induces autophagy during just the first week of treatment, returning to baseline at two weeks and after. Concordantly, markers of mitochondrial biogenesis increase over the first two weeks of treatment and return to control levels thereafter. This transient induction of autophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis suggests that damaged mitochondria are replaced by newly synthesized ones to rejuvenate mitochondrial homeostasis. This remodeling is shown to rapidly reverse the age-related reduction in fatty acid oxidation to restore a more youthful substrate utilization and energetic profile in old isolated perfused hearts, and modulates the myocardial metabolomein vivo. This study demonstrates the differential and dynamic mechanisms following rapamycin treatment and highlights the importance of understanding the temporal regulation of rapamycin effects.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cardiac muscle mitochondrial biogenesis markers (PPARGC1A and TFAM protein levels) increased during the first 2 weeks of a 10-week rapamycin feeding experiment in mice.
“Chiao et al. (2016) reported that cardiac muscle mitochondrial biogenesis markers (i.e., PPARGC1A and TFAM protein levels) increased during the first 2weeks of a 10-week rapamycin feeding experiment in mice.”
From Skeletal Muscle Ribosome and Mitochondrial Biogenesis in Response to Different Exercise Training Modalities (2021) · cites this paper as Chiao et al., 2016
The Results section, “Rapamycin induces mitochondrial biogenesis during the first 2 weeks of treatment” (Fig. 3; page not provided), reports increased PGC-1α expression at 1 and 2 weeks, measured by real-time PCR, and increased TFAM protein at those time points. It does not report an increase in PGC-1α/PPARGC1A protein levels, as the claim specifies. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 128
- Authors
- Chiao, Y. A., Kolwicz, S. C., Basisty, N., Gagnidze, A., Zhang, J., Gu, H., Djukovic, D., Beyer, R. P., Raftery, D., MacCoss, M., Tian, R., & Rabinovitch, P. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rabinovitch, Peter S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Aging
- Publisher
- Impact Journals, LLC
- Published
- 2016-02-11
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 314-327
- ISSN
- 1945-4589 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4789585
- OpenAlex
- W2336161169
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 14.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Aging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Heart Association (14SDG18590020)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (T32AG000057, P01AG001751, R01AG038550, P30AG013280)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL129510)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK035816)
- National Center for Research Resources (S10RR029021)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Keywords
- rapamycin, mTOR signaling, diastolic dysfunction, cardiac aging, mitochondrial biogenesis, mitochondrial remodeling, autophagy, ULK1 phosphorylation, fatty acid oxidation, energy metabolism, Akt phosphorylation, S6 phosphorylation, TORC1, TORC2, isolated perfused heart
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Animals, Autophagy, Energy Metabolism, Female, Heart, Immunosuppressive Agents, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mitochondria, Myocardium, Mass Spectrometry, Immunoblotting, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular, Sirolimus, Mice, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review