Cited by 36Circadian rhythm and melatoninGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer

Caloric restriction effects on liver mTOR signaling are time-of-day dependent

Open access
Tulsian, Richa, Velingkaar, Nikkhil, Kondratov, Roman·2018·Aging

Abstract

The regulation of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling contributes to the metabolic effects of a calorie restriction (CR) diet. We assayed the effect of CR on the activity of mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) in the liver of mice at six different times across the day. CR effects on mTORC1 and mTORC2 activities were time-of-day dependent. CR induced mTORC1 activity at one time, reduced at two times and has no effect during other times. CR induced mTORC2 activity at one time of the day and has no effects at other times. Circadian clocks are implemented in the regulation of mTOR signaling in mammals and mechanisms of CR. We assayed the effect of CR on mTOR signaling in the liver of mice deficient for circadian transcriptional regulators BMAL1 and CRYs. The CR induced suppression of mTORC1 activity was observed in both clock mutants, while up regulation of mTORC2 was observed in the liver of CRY deficient but not in the liver of BMAL1 deficient mice. Our finding revealed that CR has different time dependent effect on the activity of mTOR complexes 1 and 2 and suggest that circadian clock protein BMAL1 is involved in the up regulation of mTORC2 upon CR in mammals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18632/aging.101498

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 36

Authors
Tulsian, R., Velingkaar, N., & Kondratov, R.
Affiliations
Cleveland State University (US)
Corresponding author
Kondratov, Roman
Venue
Aging
Published
2018-07-16
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
1640-1648
ISSN
1945-4589 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884013871
Cited by
36
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Aging (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od025252-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG039547)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Keywords
caloric restriction, mTOR signaling, mTORC1, mTORC2, liver, circadian clock, time-of-day dependence, Bmal1, crying, clock mutants
MeSH terms
Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Gene Expression Regulation, Liver, Signal Transduction, Mice, Knockout, Caloric Restriction, Mice, ARNTL Transcription Factors, Cryptochromes, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review