Cited by 315COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Lactate dehydrogenase, an independent risk factor of severe COVID-19 patients: A retrospective and observational study

Open access
Han, Yi, Zhang, Haidong, Mu, Sucheng, Wei, Wei, Jin, Chaoyuan, Tong, Chaoyang, Song, Zhenju, Zha, Yunfei +2 more·2020·Aging

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a public health emergency of global concern. Updated analysis of cases might help identify the characteristic and risk factors of the illness severity. METHODS We extracted data regarding 47 patients with confirmed COVID-19 from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University between February 1 and February 18, 2020. The degree of severity of COVID-19 patients (severe vs. non-severe) was defined at the time of admission according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). RESULTS The median age was 64.91 years, 26 cases (55.31%) were male of which, and 70.83% were severe cases. Severe patients had higher APACHE II (9.92 vs 4.74) and SOFA (3.0 vs 1.0) scores on admission, as well as the higher PSI (86.13 vs 61.39), Curb-65 (1.14 vs 0.48) and CT semiquantitative scores (5.0 vs 2.0) when compared with non-severe patients. Among all univariable parameters, APACHE II, SOFA, lymphocytes, CRP, LDH, AST, cTnI, BNP, et al were significantly independent risk factors of COVID-19 severity. Among which, LDH was most positively related both with APACHE II (R = 0.682) and SOFA (R = 0.790) scores, as well as PSI (R = 0.465) and CT (R = 0.837) scores. To assess the diagnostic value of these selected parameters, LDH (0.9727) had maximum sensitivity (100.00%) and specificity (86.67%), with the cutoff value of 283. As a protective factor, lymphocyte counts less than 1.045 ⨯ 10 9 /L showed a good accuracy for identification of severe patients with AUC = 0.9845 (95%CI 0.959-1.01), the maximum specificity (91.30%) and sensitivity (95.24%). In addition, LDH was positively correlated with CRP, AST, BNP and cTnI, while negatively correlated with lymphocyte cells and its subsets, including CD3 + , CD4 + and CD8 + T cells (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS This study showed that LDH could be identified as a powerful predictive factor for early recognition of lung injury and severe COVID-19 cases. And importantly, lymphocyte counts, especially CD3 + , CD4 + , and CD8 + T cells in the peripheral blood of COVID-19 patients, which was relevant with serum LDH, were also dynamically correlated with the severity of the disease. FUNDING Key Project of Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau (2016ZB0202)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18632/aging.103372

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interpretation of LDH results may be difficult in COVID-19 patients, as both lactate and LDH were also found to be independent risk factors of severe forms of COVID-19.

    “However, interpretation of the results may be difficult in COVID-19 patients, as both lactate and LDH were also found to be independent risk factors of severe forms of COVID-19 [57,58].”

    From Acute mesenteric ischemia in COVID-19 patients (2021) · cites this paper as [57]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 315

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China home page. 2020 http://www.nhc.gov.cn PMC8392946 34594648

Authors
Han, Y., Zhang, H., Mu, S., Wei, W., Jin, C., Tong, C., Song, Z., Zha, Y., Xue, Y., & Gu, G.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (CN)
  • Emergency Department, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 20032, China
Corresponding author
Gu, Guorong
Venue
Aging
Published
2020-06-24
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
11245-11258
ISSN
1945-4589 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3037780771
Cited by
315
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 59
FWCI
8.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Aging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fudan University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, lactate dehydrogenase, disease severity, risk factors, prognostic factors, APACHE II score, SOFA score, C-reactive protein, lymphocytes, acute lung injury, PaO2/FiO2 ratio
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, L-Lactate Dehydrogenase, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Biomarkers, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review