SOD1, an unexpected novel target for cancer therapy.
Open accessAbstract
Cancer cells have elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are generated in majority by the mitochondria. In the mitochondrial matrix, the manganese dismutase SOD2 acts as a major anti-oxidant enzyme. The deacetylase SIRT3 regulates the activity of SOD2. Recently, SIRT3 was reported to be decreased in 87% of breast cancers, resulting therefore in a decrease in the activity of SOD2 and an elevation in ROS. In addition to SIRT3, we recently reported that SOD2 itself is down-regulated in breast cancer cell lines upon activation of oncogenes, such as Ras. Since in absence of SOD2, superoxide levels are elevated and may cause irreversible damage, mechanisms must exist to retain superoxide below a critical threshold and maintain viability of cancer cells. The copper/zinc dismutase SOD1 localizes in the cytoplasm, the inter-membrane space of the mitochondria and the nucleus. Emerging evidences from several groups now indicate that SOD1 is overexpressed in cancers and that the activity of SOD1 may be essential to maintain cellular ROS under this critical threshold. This review summarizes the studies reporting important roles of SOD1 in cancer and addresses the potential cross-talk between the overexpression of SOD1 and the regulation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPR(mt)). While mutations in SOD1 is the cause of 20% of cases of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (fALS), a devastating neurodegenerative disease, these new studies expand the role of SOD1 to cancer.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An additional chromosome 19q loss was specifically in cell fate 2.
“To test whether there were genomic alterations accompanying the transcriptomic divergence, we inferred copy number aberrations from the scRNA-seq data using the inferCNV package44, which revealed a chromosome 16p gain in the later passage PDO, and an additional chromosome 19q loss specifically in cell fate 2 (Fig. 6d).”
From Occult polyclonality of preclinical pancreatic cancer models drives in vitro evolution (2022) · cites this paper as [44]
InferCNV revealed a chromosome 16p gain in the later passage PDO.
“To test whether there were genomic alterations accompanying the transcriptomic divergence, we inferred copy number aberrations from the scRNA-seq data using the inferCNV package44, which revealed a chromosome 16p gain in the later passage PDO, and an additional chromosome 19q loss specifically in cell fate 2 (Fig. 6d).”
From Occult polyclonality of preclinical pancreatic cancer models drives in vitro evolution (2022) · cites this paper as [44]
The regulatory consequences of Sp/Klf motif enrichment are in genes associated with modulation of reactive oxygen species and metabolism such as SOD1, ID1, and NDUFV2.
“In doing so, we find that the regulatory consequences of Sp/Klf motif enrichment are in genes associated with modulation of reactive oxygen species and metabolism such as SOD144, ID145, and NDUFV246.”
From Occult polyclonality of preclinical pancreatic cancer models drives in vitro evolution (2022) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 147
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [46]Finley LW Carracedo A Lee J SIRT3 opposes reprogramming of cancer cell metabolism through HIF1alpha destabilization Cancer Cell 2011 19 3 416 428 21397863 PMC3065720
- Authors
- Papa, L., Manfredi, G., & Germain, D.
- Affiliations
- Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- Venue
- Genes & Cancer
- Publisher
- Impact Journals, LLC
- Published
- 2014-04-22
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 15-21
- ISSN
- 1947-6019 (ISSN-L)
- 1947-6027
- PMC
- PMC4063254
- OpenAlex
- W1591649477
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Genes & Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ns051419-09, NS051419)
- National Cancer Institute (CA78207, R01CA109482, T32CA078207)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS062055, R01-NS051419, R01NS084486)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer and biochemical research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms
- Keywords
- SOD1, manganese superoxide dismutase, reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial superoxide, SIRT3, breast cancer, oncogenic Ras, mitochondrial unfolded protein response, cancer therapy targets, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, oxidative stress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review