Cited by 350Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

The cornucopia of meaningful leads: Applying deep adversarial autoencoders for new molecule development in oncology

Open access
Kadurin, Artur, Aliper, Alexander, Kazennov, Andrey, Mamoshina, Polina, Vanhaelen, Quentin, Khrabrov, Kuzma, Zhavoronkov, Alex·2017·Oncotarget

Abstract

// Artur Kadurin 1, 2, 3, 4 , Alexander Aliper 2 , Andrey Kazennov 2, 7 , Polina Mamoshina 2, 5 , Quentin Vanhaelen 2 , Kuzma Khrabrov 1 , Alex Zhavoronkov 2, 6, 7 1 Search Department, Mail.Ru Group Ltd., Moscow, Russia 2 Pharmaceutical Artificial Intelligence Department, Insilico Medicine, Inc., Emerging Technology Centers, Johns Hopkins University at Eastern, Baltimore, Maryland, USA 3 Big Data and Text Analysis Laboratory, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia 4 St. Petersburg Department of V.A. Steklov Institute of Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Petersburg, Russia 5 Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 6 The Biogerontology Research Foundation, Trevissome Park, Truro TR4 8UN, UK 7 Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia Correspondence to: Alex Zhavoronkov, email: alex@insilicomedicine.com Keywords: generative adversarian networks, adversarial autoencoder, deep learning, drug discovery, artificial intelligence Received: June 14, 2016 Accepted: November 24, 2016 Published: December 22, 2016 ABSTRACT Recent advances in deep learning and specifically in generative adversarial networks have demonstrated surprising results in generating new images and videos upon request even using natural language as input. In this paper we present the first application of generative adversarial autoencoders (AAE) for generating novel molecular fingerprints with a defined set of parameters. We developed a 7-layer AAE architecture with the latent middle layer serving as a discriminator. As an input and output the AAE uses a vector of binary fingerprints and concentration of the molecule. In the latent layer we also introduced a neuron responsible for growth inhibition percentage, which when negative indicates the reduction in the number of tumor cells after the treatment. To train the AAE we used the NCI-60 cell line assay data for 6252 compounds profiled on MCF-7 cell line. The output of the AAE was used to screen 72 million compounds in PubChem and select candidate molecules with potential anti-cancer properties. This approach is a proof of concept of an artificially-intelligent drug discovery engine, where AAEs are used to generate new molecular fingerprints with the desired molecular properties.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18632/oncotarget.14073

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 350

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Goodfellow IJ Warde-Farley D Mirza M Courville A Bengio Y Maxout Networks arXiv: 1302.4389v4 [stat. ML] 2013 · arXiv

Authors
Kadurin, A., Aliper, A., Kazennov, A., Mamoshina, P., Vanhaelen, Q., Khrabrov, K., & Zhavoronkov, A.
Affiliations
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Search Department, Mail.Ru Group Ltd., Moscow, Russia
Venue
Oncotarget
Published
2016-12-22
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
10883-10890
ISSN
1949-2553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2567534979
Cited by
350
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
FWCI
24.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Oncotarget (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Nvidia
  • Kazan Federal University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
drug discovery, anticancer agents, MCF-7 cells, growth inhibition, generative adversarial networks, anticancer drug development, artificial intelligence in drug discovery, molecular property prediction, biogerontology
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Antineoplastic Agents, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, Drug Therapy, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer, K562 Cells, Cell Line, Tumor, High-Throughput Screening Assays, MCF-7 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review