Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Text Mining Infrastructure in R

Open access
Feinerer, Ingo, Hornik, Kurt, Meyer, David·2008·Journal of Statistical Software

Abstract

During the last decade text mining has become a widely used discipline utilizing statistical and machine learning methods. We present the tm package which provides a framework for text mining applications within R. We give a survey on text mining facilities in R and explain how typical application tasks can be carried out using our framework. We present techniques for count-based analysis methods, text clustering, text classification and string kernels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18637/jss.v025.i05

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

See all 1,252

Metadata

Authors
Feinerer, I., Hornik, K., & Meyer, D.
Venue
Journal of Statistical Software
Published
2008
Volume
25
Issue
5
ISSN
1548-7660 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161793142
Cited by
1,252
References
62
FWCI
61.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Text Mining Infrastructure in R. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18637/jss.v025.i05
The paper
Feinerer, I., Hornik, K., & Meyer, D. (2008). Text Mining Infrastructure in R. Journal of Statistical Software. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i05

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.