The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Dependence with C- and D-Vine Copulas: The R Package CDVine
Open accessAbstract
Flexible multivariate distributions are needed in many areas. The popular multivariate Gaussian distribution is however very restrictive and cannot account for features like asymmetry and heavy tails. Therefore dependence modeling using copulas is nowadays very common to account for such patterns. The use of copulas is however challenging in higher dimensions, where standard multivariate copulas suffer from rather inflexible structures. Vine copulas overcome such limitations and are able to model complex dependency patterns by benefiting from the rich variety of bivariate copulas as building blocks. This article presents the R package CDVine which provides functions and tools for statistical inference of canonical vine (C-vine) and D-vine copulas. It contains tools for bivariate exploratory data analysis and for bivariate copula selection as well as for selection of pair-copula families in a vine. Models can be estimated either sequentially or by joint maximum likelihood estimation. Sampling algorithms and graphical methods are also included.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033
Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle
Akaike, H. (1998) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15 · Cited by 17,781
The igraph software package for complex network research
Csárdi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,078
Nelsen, R. B. (1999) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3076-0 · Cited by 7,744
Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses
Vuong, Q. H. (1989) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912557 · Cited by 5,929
Fonctions de répartition à N dimensions et leurs marges
Sklar, M. (1959) · HAL · Cited by 4,671
Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts.
Ringrose, T., & Joe, H. (1998) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533875 · Cited by 3,403
Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence
Aas, K., Czado, C., Frigessi, A., & Bakken, H. (2009) · Insurance: Mathematics and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.02.001 · Cited by 2,039
Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Copula Modeling but Were Afraid to Ask
Genest, C., & Favre, A.-C. (2007) · Journal of Hydrologic Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2007)12:4(347 · Cited by 1,618
Cited by
A review of quantification methodologies for multi-hazard interrelationships
Tilloy, A., Malamud, B. D., Winter, H., & Joly-Laugel, A. (2019) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102881 · Cited by 364
Gräler, B., van den Berg, M. J., Vandenberghe, S., Petroselli, A., Grimaldi, S., De Baets, B., & Verhoest, N. E. C. (2013) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-17-1281-2013 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Brechmann, E. C., & Schepsmeier, U.
- Venue
- Journal of Statistical Software
- Publisher
- Foundation for Open Access Statistic
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1548-7660 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1895429286
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 63.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling Dependence with C- and D-Vine Copulas: The R Package CDVine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18637/jss.v052.i03
- The paper
- Brechmann, E. C., & Schepsmeier, U. (2013). Modeling Dependence with C- and D-Vine Copulas: The R Package CDVine. Journal of Statistical Software. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v052.i03
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.