Moses in Ethiopia: Legend and Literature
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous scholarship has tended to read the Ethiopian expedition in isolation, often interested in Josephus' relationship with his sources more than Josephus' own narrative.
“Previous scholarship, often interested in Josephus' relationship with his sources more than Josephus' own narrative, has tended to read the Ethiopian expedition in isolation.”
From PROPHECIES AND PRINCESSES: MOSES IN EGYPT AND ETHIOPIA ACCORDING TO JOSEPHUS (2022) · cites this paper as Rajak 1978
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Moses Outside the Torah and the Construction of a Diaspora Identity
Römer, T. (2008) · The Journal of Hebrew Scriptures · doi:10.5508/jhs.2008.v8.a15 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
PROPHECIES AND PRINCESSES: MOSES IN EGYPT AND ETHIOPIA ACCORDING TO JOSEPHUS
Westwood, U. (2022) · Akroterion · doi:10.7445/67--1047
- Authors
- Rajak, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Reading (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Rajak, Tessa
- Venue
- Journal of Jewish Studies
- Publisher
- Liverpool University Press
- Published
- 1978-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 111-122
- ISSN
- 0022-2097 (ISSN-L)
- 2056-6689
- OpenAlex
- W2318843197
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Jewish Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › African history and culture analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- Keywords
- Moses, Ethiopia, legends, literature, Jewish literature, Ethiopian Jews, Exodus narrative, reception of Moses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
