The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization
Open accessAbstract
Currently used metrics for assessing summarization algorithms do not account for whether summaries are factually consistent with source documents.We propose a weakly-supervised, model-based approach for verifying factual consistency and identifying conflicts between source documents and a generated summary.Training data is generated by applying a series of rule-based transformations to the sentences of source documents.The factual consistency model is then trained jointly for three tasks: 1) identify whether sentences remain factually consistent after transformation, 2) extract a span in the source documents to support the consistency prediction, 3) extract a span in the summary sentence that is inconsistent if one exists.Transferring this model to summaries generated by several state-of-the art models reveals that this highly scalable approach substantially outperforms previous models, including those trained with strong supervision using standard datasets for natural language inference and fact checking.Additionally, human evaluation shows that the auxiliary span extraction tasks provide useful assistance in the process of verifying factual consistency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In most previous works, factuality has been defined as whether a claim in a text can be supported by evidence from a separate, trustworthy knowledge base, with applications in fact-checking (Thorne et al., 2018b) (where the knowledge base is a large source like Wikipedia) and summarization (Kryscinski et al., 2020) (where the knowledge base is an input document or documents).”
From FacTool: Factuality Detection in Generative AI - A Tool Augmented Framework for Multi-Task and Multi-Domain Scenarios (2023) · cites this paper as Kryscinski et al., 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, hallucinations are observed over a wide range of tasks beyond pure fact verification (Kryscinski et al., 2020; Maynez et al., 2020).”
From SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Models (2023) · cites this paper as Kryscinski et al., 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Research suggests that up to 30% of machine-generated abstractive summaries may contain factual inconsistencies [52, 53].”
From All Public Voices Are Equal, But Are Some More Equal Than Others to LLMs? (2026) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Results show that the performance of their FactCC model surpasses the classifiers trained on the MNLI or FEVER datasets.”
From Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation (2023) · cites this paper as [126]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These methods, such as entity swapping and sentence negation (Kryscinski et al., 2020;Goyal and Durrett, 2021), were designed to target specific error types that occurred in claims from earlier summarization models.”
From MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documents (2024) · cites this paper as Kryscinski et al., 2020
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In response to this challenge, a surge of research explores leveraging data-augmentation methods to construct synthetical data for fine-tuning the classifier, either by rule-based perturbation [79, 152, 266] or generation [389].”
From A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions (2025) · cites this paper as [152]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“most prior studies have primarily concentrated on task-specific hallucinations, such as abstractive summarization [81, 102, 152, 208, 236, 310], data-to-text[240, 296], and machine translation [389].”
From A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions (2025) · cites this paper as [152]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“This approach has been widely studied in the summarization literature and recent work in factual precision (Kryscinski et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020; Gao et al., 2022; Manakul et al., 2023).”
From FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generation (2023) · cites this paper as Kryscinski et al., 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3215 · Cited by 17,766
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
(2017) · Cited by 11,625
(2004) · Cited by 9,718
Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networks
See, A., Liu, P. J., & Manning, C. D. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1099 · Cited by 3,775
A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inference
Williams, A., Nangia, N., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1101 · Cited by 3,342
A Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence Summarization
Rush, A. M., Chopra, S., & Weston, J. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1044 · Cited by 2,932
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Ben- gio. 2015. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. In ICLR.
- Samuel R. Bowman, Gabor Angeli, Christopher Potts, and Christopher D. Manning. 2015. A large an- notated corpus for learning natural language infer- ence. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). Association for Computational Linguis- tics.
- Kyunghyun Cho, Bart van Merrienboer, C ¸aglar Gülc ¸ehre, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Fethi Bougares, Hol- ger Schwenk, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Nat- ural Language Processing, EMNLP 2014, October 25-29, 2014, Doha, Qatar, A meeting of SIGDAT, a Special Interest Group of the ACL, pages 1724- 1734.
- Alexis Conneau, Ruty Rinott, Guillaume Lample, Ad- ina Williams, Samuel R. Bowman, Holger Schwenk, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2018. Xnli: Evaluating cross- lingual sentence representations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Nat- ural Language Processing. Association for Compu- tational Linguistics.
- Sergey Edunov, Myle Ott, Michael Auli, and David Grangier. 2018. Understanding back-translation at scale. CoRR, abs/1808.09381. · arXiv
- Ramesh Nallapati, Bowen Zhou, C ¸aglar Gülc ¸ehre, Bing Xiang, et al. 2016. Abstractive text summa- rization using sequence-to-sequence rnns and be- yond. Proceedings of SIGNLL Conference on Com- putational Natural Language Learning.
- Ramakanth Pasunuru and Mohit Bansal. 2018. Multi- reward reinforced summarization with saliency and entailment. CoRR, abs/1804.06451. · arXiv
- Matthew E. Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2018. Deep contextualized word rep- resentations. In Proc. of NAACL.
- James Thorne, Andreas Vlachos, Christos Christodoulopoulos, and Arpit Mittal. 2018. FEVER: a large-scale dataset for fact extraction and verification. CoRR, abs/1803.05355. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–693 of 693
A Review of Automatic Text Summarization: The Case of Greek Legal Documents
Pappa, L., Karvelis, P. S., & Stylios, C. D. (2025) · South-East Europe Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Social Media Conference (SEEDA-CECNSM) · doi:10.1109/seeda-cecnsm68644.2025.11329594
Dabbabi, K., Kehili, A., & Cherif, A. (2025) · International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering · doi:10.1109/sta66620.2025.11364665
Tripathi, S., Jennifer, T., Griffith, H., & Rathore, H. (2026) · IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference · doi:10.1109/ccnc65079.2026.11366495 · Cited by 1
Heterogeneous Information-Driven Contrastive Optimization for Abstractive Summarization
Wang, P., Lu, J., & Gong, S. (2026) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-026-10704-8
Nag, A., & Chaudhuri, D. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7534-2.ch012
Shoba, S., Sahu, K., Bhore, S. R., & Manigandan, M. (2026) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence in Data Science (ICCIDS) · doi:10.1109/iccids69108.2026.11407532
Detecting and Correcting Hallucinations in Paragraph-Level Text with Ensemble-Based Evaluation
Tripathi, S., & Rathore, H. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA) · doi:10.1109/tps-isa67132.2025.00077
Cross-Language Summarization Method for Enhancing Factual Consistency Based on Auxiliary Information
Li, X., Liu, M., Yang, Y., & Ju, S. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-6426-2_5
Sinha, N., Gupta, S., Kour, V., Misra, M., & Misra, R. N. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata66926.2025.11400870
Пасічник, В. В., & YAROMYCH, M. (2026) · Науковий вісник НЛТУ України · doi:10.36930/40360112 · Cited by 2
Rahman, M., & Chowdhury, M. (2026) · International Conference on Electrical, Computer & Telecommunication Engineering (ICECTE) · doi:10.1109/icecte69292.2026.11429437
Boosting Saliency Perception with Self-Prompting in Abstractive Summarization
Lu, F., Jing, H., & Duan, J. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science and Information Processing (AICSIP) · doi:10.1109/aicsip65423.2025.11427293
NeuroLex: A Lightweight Domain Language Model for EEG Report Understanding and Generation
Yin, K., & Shin, H.-B. (2026) · International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) · doi:10.1109/bci69045.2026.11435041 · Cited by 2
A Novel Hybrid Graph-Attention Summarization with Adaptive Ranking
P.Neelakantan, Rishi, N. K., & Banu, Y. C. (2025) · International Conference on Signal Processing, Computation, Electronics, Power and Telecommunication (IConSCEPT) · doi:10.1109/iconscept66142.2025.11436562
Factually Consistent Prompting with LLMs for Cross-Lingual Dialogue Summarization
Bao, Z., Ding, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Sun, Z., Cichocki, A. S., & Yang, Z. (2026) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers15030197
A Sentence-Level Risk Estimator for Identifying Hallucinations in Generative AI
Gupta, V., Chakravarti, L., Akhtar, M. M., Maheshwari, P., Garg, P., & Tiwari, D. (2026) · International Conference on AI-Driven Smart Systems and Ubiquitous Computing (ICAUC) · doi:10.1109/icauc68182.2026.11441054
Lekova, A. K., Tsvetkova, P., & Stefanov, T. (2026) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2026.1758391 · Cited by 1
Ghosh, A., Kumar, N., Patnaik, N., Prakash, A., Raj, R., & Saha, S. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare · doi:10.1145/3805803 · Cited by 1
Predicting Truthfulness of Large Language Model Generated Answers Using TruthfulQA
Chatterjee, T., & Agrawal, P. K. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Interdisciplinary Approaches in Technology and Management for Social Innovation (IATMSI) · doi:10.1109/iatmsi68868.2026.11465673
Controllable and Document-Level Text Simplification
Cripwell, L. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/39a81752z69b3z4c9bzb9f9z4ac49474d4c5
Aloraini, E., Shaban, K., Hamdi, A., & Elmahjub, E. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6582144 · Cited by 1
Николаевич, Г. В. (2026) · Программные системы и вычислительные методы · doi:10.7256/2454-0714.2026.1.78734
Constrained Paraphrase Consistency for LLM Hallucination Detection
Lin, S., Hong, D., Ju, S., Chen, C., Zhang, X., & Liao, X. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp55912.2026.11462617
Cross Paraphrastic Invariance Learning for Hallucination Detection
Lin, S., Hong, D., Ju, S., Chen, C., Xie, S., & Liao, X. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp55912.2026.11463868
Khandelwal, D., Tanwar, M. S., Nayer, N., & Gupta, S. C. (2026) · International Conference on Advancing Sustainable Solutions through Technologies (ICASST) · doi:10.1109/icasst68917.2026.11484152
RGPO: Ranking-Guided Preference Optimization for Reliable Clinical Reasoning
Hsu, C. T., Ding, J.-E., Hsu, H.-L., Hsu, C.-H., Yang, S., Yao, L.-H., Liao, C.-C., Liu, F., & Hung, F. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2026.3688221
Nguyen, H., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Ding, J., & Chen, H. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Testing (AITest) · doi:10.1109/aitest70988.2026.00042 · Cited by 1
A Reference-Free Scoring Framework for Question Answering: Evidence-Based Credibility Assessment
Yang, L., Chen, X., Pang, B., Huo, Y., Zhan, X., Guo, Y., Li, Y., Ma, Y., & Li, C. J. (2026) · International Conference on Generative Artificial Intelligence and Digital Media · doi:10.1145/3803730.3803759
Method Distinction for Hallucination Detection
Gupta, B. P., Gayratovich, E. N., & Madaminov, B. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7320-1.ch007
Cutillas, A. L., Bacalso, F., Tomol, C. J., Albarracin, M., Campita, R. A., Benolirao, E., Yamagishi, K. D., & Ocampo, L. A. (2026) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a19050406
A Hybrid LLM-Based Architecture for Reliable Standardization of Heterogeneous Grant Information
Strykowski, S., Leszczyński, C., Kumor, S., & Śliwicki, M. (2026) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-26363-6_19
Xie, H., & He, M. (2026) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3774905.3794656
Synonym Knowledge Graph Enhanced Language Model for Inconsistent Hallucination Detection
Yang, J., Zheng, H., Wang, H., & Kim, H. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3819585
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Pharmaceutical Regulatory Intelligence: A Narrative Review
Bianchi, L., Rossi, M., & Romano, G. (2026) · Pharmacophore · doi:10.51847/sma6gzncaq
Automatic generation of titles for research papers using language models
Rehman, T., Sanyal, D. K., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2026) · International Journal on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1007/s00799-026-00443-1
TrafficRAG: A Multimodal RAG Framework for Traffic Accident Liability Determination
Li, X., Fu, Z., Li, X., & Han, X. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-38407-2_6
Palanisamy, B., Chalapathi, G., & Hassija, V. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-026-11580-z
Álvarez, Y. D., Pinto-Elías, R., Magadán-Salazar, A., Castro-Sánchez, N. A., & Fuentes-Pacheco, J. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-28393-1_25
A Comprehensive Review of Recent Text Summarization Models
Ajallouda, L., & Zellou, A. (2026) · International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET) · doi:10.1109/iraset68627.2026.11538821
OpenChartInsight: Lightweight Automatic Interpretation of GitHub Charts
Xie, S., Wang, Y., & Wang, W. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-9694-2_4
Implicit Affective Steering: A Design Probe for Generative Curatorial Storytelling
Ma, M. C., Shi, L., Li, H., Cheng, J., & Kirk, D. S. (2026) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3800645.3812861
Медианные значения метрик соответствия для классов SUPORT и CONTRADICT
Кузнецов, И. (2026) · Cifra LLC Journals · doi:10.60797/irj.2026.168.94.4
Кузнецов, И. (2026) · CyberLeninK (CyberLeninka) · doi:10.60797/irj.2026.168.94
Основные этапы комплексной оценки соответствия научных утверждений информации из первоисточника
Кузнецов, И. (2026) · Cifra LLC Journals · doi:10.60797/irj.2026.168.94.3
Современные методы повышения качества цитатно-осведомленной суммаризации
Кузнецов, И. (2026) · Cifra LLC Journals · doi:10.60797/irj.2026.168.94.2
Основные этапы цитатно-осведомленной суммаризации
Кузнецов, И. (2026) · Cifra LLC Journals · doi:10.60797/irj.2026.168.94.1
Puneeth, R., & Somasekar, J. (2026) · Journal of Innovation and Technology · doi:10.61453/joit.v2026_0207
Sakib, A. N., Chisty, M. M. O., & Zhang, Z. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812342
Gao, P., Qin, X., & Zhang, Z. L. (2026) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-026-08674-4
Temporal and linguistic enrichment for abstractive text summarization using transformer models
Abdalgader, K., Ahmed, F. Y. H., Wassie, B., Kerala, K., Heramo, N., & Gudeta, R. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-01710-5
Jang, S., Myoungrak, L. E. E., & Shon, T. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15132949
A Deep Learning Framework for Automatic Extractive Text Summarization
Dharmarajan, R., Varadharajan, S., & Vasu, K. (2026) · International conference Computer Networks and Inventive Communication Technologies · doi:10.1109/iccnct68477.2026.11590392
A Multi-Facet Strategy for Low Hallucination Risk in Abstractive Text Summarization
Sharma, N., & Singh, S. (2026) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2026.06.267
Towards Trustworthy AI: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Model Safety Across Dimensions
Hasan, M. M., Logofătu, D., & Ray, J. K. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-31141-2_25
Hatoum, C., Combes, C., Fresse, V., Gravier, C., & Orzalesi, M. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-31141-2_13
HIVE: Understanding Post-hallucination Reasoning in Vision Language Models
He, F., Wang, Z., Wang, Q., Guan, Q., Liu, D., Tang, R., & Li, Q. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-37271-0_34
Mitigating position bias in hybrid summarisation via a Gated Dual-Encoder network
Wang, J., Han, X., Cao, L., Tian, Y., Yuan, D., & Cheng, L. (2026) · Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/0952813x.2026.2698551
Irons, J. L., Cooper, P. S., Bölücü, N., Duenser, A., Timmer, R. C., Yang, H., Lee, C., Jin, B., & Wan, S. (2026) · ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval (ICTIR) · doi:10.1145/3805713.3820430
Guo, X., Xie, Z., & Chen, P. H. (2026) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3805712.3809915
Hallucinations in LLMs: a lifecycle-based survey of causes, detection, mitigation, and prevention
Lamba, N., Tiwari, S., & Gaur, M. (2026) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-026-01214-6 · Cited by 1
A Multi-Stage Agentic Approach to Factuality-Aware Long and Multi-Document Text Summarization
Khandar, P. V., Mohanty, D. K., & Baliarsingh, S. K. (2026) · International Conference on Innovations in Communication, Geoscience and Robotics (ICICGR) · doi:10.1109/icicgr68236.2026.11600371
Summarizing India’s News: IndoSumm and CoheraText for Multi-Document Abstractive Summarization
Motghare, M., Agarwal, M., & Agrawal, A. (2026) · IETE Technical Review · doi:10.1080/02564602.2026.2703143
Song, W., Wang, X., Liang, S., & Wang, J. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2026.3716609
Pakull, T. M. G., Bender, N., Benson, S., Fleischhauer, A., Alsara, M., Gromke, T., Hilser, T., Kaminski, K., Pogorzelski, M., Prasuhn, N., et al. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/99136 · Cited by 1
Rejectors in the Wild: Deployment Barriers for LLM Rejectors
Schönwälder, E., Hartmann, C., & Lehner, W. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3817850
AMOS: Active Mining with Observable Steps for Agenda-Driven Review Knowledge Discovery
Yeh, C.-Y., Huang, W., Chen, H.-W., Wang, C., Yang, D.-N., Lee, W.-C., Yu, P. S., & Chen⋆, M.-S. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3817839
Eye-tracking-while-reading: A living survey of datasets with open library support
Jakobi, D. N., Reich, D., Prasse, P., Hofmann, J., Bolliger, L., & Jäger, L. (2026) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-026-03126-6 · Cited by 2
Faithful detection of hallucinations in event extraction via causal intervention
Yang, L., Rong, C., Chen, L., Wang, X., & Tao, Z. (2026) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2026.116819
FineSurE-VN: Semantic-Based Evaluation of Vietnamese Text Summarization
Bui, T. M., Vu, A. M., Trinh, K. N., & Mai, D.-T. (2026) · International Conference on Intelligent Information Technology (ICIIT) · doi:10.1145/3805862.3805894
Khan, T., & Osondu, I. S. (2026) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--59130
Quantum Anti-Hallucination Firewall: Multi-World Verification for RAG Systems.Preprint
Tishkov, V. (2026) · doi:10.24108/preprints-3116226
EVESUM: Abstractive Multi‐Document Summarization Focused on Crucial Events
Yang, P., Ji, S., Li, B., Sun, Y., & Yi, M. (2026) · Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1111/coin.70294
Aftiss, A., Lamsiyah, S., Schommer, C., & Alaoui, S. O. E. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3729844
Reducing Hallucinations in Scientific Paper Highlight Generation
Rehman, T. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30438-4_43
Hierarchical Reasoning and Evidence-Guided Agentic Framework for Factual Text Summarization
Khandar, P. V., Mohanty, D. K., & Baliarsingh, S. K. (2026) · International Conference Computational Vision and Bio Inspired Computing · doi:10.1109/iccvbic71195.2026.11688292
Duarte-Martínez, V., Cobo, M. J., & Mendoza, J. N. (2026) · International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment · doi:10.1109/icedeg70169.2026.11695401
Vera, L., Craveiro, O., Malheiro, R., Dias, M., & Correia, R. (2026) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make8100305
EmphaBot: Enhancing accessibility in mental health support using a CoT-RAG-based language model
Nwokoye, C. H., & Iloka, B. O. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101361
Akintande, O. J. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7295938
An Ensemble-Based Approach to Validating AI-Generated Clinical Discharge Summaries
Reichenpfader, D., & Denecke, K. (2026) · Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems · doi:10.1109/cbms69103.2026.00201
Ouverney, T., & Pereira, V. (2026) · Anais do Symposium on Knowledge Discovery, Mining and Learning (KDMiLe) · doi:10.5753/kdmile.2026.27518
Hallucination Detection Middleware using RAG Based Model
Lakshmanan, A., Nithyanandh, S., & Mohanapriya, D. (2026) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.32628/cseit2612556
Estimating Hallucination Risk in Large Language Models with Intrinsic Priors and Entailment Signals
Sunith, A., Anand, V., & Sangeetha, J. (2026) · International Conference on Trends in Engineering Systems and Technologies (ICTEST) · doi:10.1109/ictest69239.2026.11722825
Controlling Attention Dynamics for Factual Grounding in Neural Text Generation
Rozario, R. M., Ogunbona, P., Win, K. T., & Yang, J. (2026) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn69854.2026.11729145
Zhu, Y., Zhang, X., Gao, J., Li, L., & Wang, X. (2026) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s44443-026-01349-3
Granularity is the Hidden Bias: Revisiting the Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarization
Ma, W., Gao, J., Nie, Z., Yang, Z., Tong, C., Guo, C., & Jiang, L. (2026) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn69854.2026.11728799
MACRA: a training-free multi-agent framework for reliable and cost-aware clinical summarization
Yin, P., Zhu, C., & Tao, W. (2026) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-026-08944-1
Synthetic Data Distillation from Large Language Models for Turkish Abstractive News Summarization
Çalışkan, Ç., Kaçıkan, E., & Onan, A. (2026) · International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (IDAP) · doi:10.1109/idap71869.2026.11728122
PeerCheck: Enhancing LLM-Generated Academic Reviews Towards Human-Level Quality
Chen, Z., Yang, Z., Ma, Y., Backes, M., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026 · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1170
BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generation
Yuan, W., Neubig, G., & Liu, P. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.11520 · Cited by 353
Evaluation of Text Generation: A Survey
Celikyilmaz, A., Clark, E., & Gao, J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.14799 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Kryscinski, W., McCann, B., Xiong, C., & Socher, R.
- Affiliations
- Salesforce (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 9332-9346
- OpenAlex
- W2981456979
- Cited by
- 669
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 94 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 171 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 37
- FWCI
- 41.26
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- abstractive summarization, factual consistency, weakly supervised learning, rule-based transformation, span extraction, natural language inference, fact-checking, summarization evaluation metrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review