CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14Speech and dialogue systemsLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesNatural Language Processing Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Grounding as a Collaborative Process

Open access
Benotti, Luciana, Blackburn, Patrick·2021·Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume
DOI 10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.41
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Collaborative grounding is a fundamental aspect of human-human dialog which allows people to negotiate meaning.In this paper we argue that it is missing from current deep learning approaches to dialog and interactive systems.Our central point is that making mistakes and being able to recover from them collaboratively is a key ingredient in grounding meaning.We illustrate the pitfalls of being unable to ground collaboratively, discuss what can be learned from the language acquisition and dialog systems literature, and reflect on how to move forward.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.41

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 99

  1. Shubham Agarwal, Trung Bui, Joon-Young Lee, Ioan- nis Konstas, and Verena Rieser. 2020. History for visual dialog: Do we really need it? In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 8182-8197, On- line. ACL.
  2. Huda Alamri, Vincent Cartillier, Abhishek Das, Jue Wang, Anoop Cherian, Irfan Essa, Dhruv Batra, Tim Marks, Chiori Hori, Peter Anderson, Stephan Lee, and Debi Parikh. 2019. Audio visual scene-aware dialog. In 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 7550-7559.
  3. Malihe Alikhani and Matthew Stone. 2020. Achiev- ing common ground in multi-modal dialogue. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics: Tutorial Ab- stracts, pages 10-15. ACL.
  4. James F. Allen, Donna K. Byron, Myroslava Dzikovska, George Ferguson, Lucian Galescu, and Amanda Stent. 2001. Toward conversational human- computer interaction. AI Magazine, 22(4):27-37.
  5. Jens Allwood. 1993. Feedback in second language ac- quisition. In Adult Language Acquisition: Cross Linguistic Perspectives, II: The Results, pages 196- 235. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Jens Allwood. 1997. Notes on dialog and cooperation. In IJCAI-97 Workshop on Collaboration, Coopera- tion and Conflict in Dialogue Systems, pages 8-10.
  7. Jason Baldridge, Tania Bedrax-Weiss, Daphne Luong, Srini Narayanan, Bo Pang, Fernando Pereira, Radu Soricut, Michael Tseng, and Yuan Zhang. 2018. Points, paths, and playscapes: Large-scale spatial language understanding tasks set in the real world. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Spatial Language Understanding, pages 46-52.
  8. ACL.
  9. Timo Baumann and David Schlangen. 2012. IN- PRO iSS: A component for just-in-time incremental speech synthesis. In Proceedings of the ACL 2012 System Demonstrations, pages 103-108, Jeju Island, Korea. ACL.
  10. Jason Baumgartner, Savvas Zannettou, Brian Keegan, Megan Squire, and Jeremy Blackburn. 2020. The pushshift reddit dataset. In Proceedings of the Four- teenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM 2020, Held Virtually, Origi- nal Venue: Atlanta, Georgia, USA, June 8-11, 2020, pages 830-839. AAAI Press.
  11. Luciana Benotti. 2010. Implicature as an interactive Process. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Lorraine. Su- pervised by Patrick Blackburn.
  12. Luciana Benotti and Patrick Blackburn. 2014. Context and implicature. In Patrick Brézillon and Avelino J. Gonzalez, editors, Context in Computing -A Cross- Disciplinary Approach for Modeling the Real World, pages 419-436. Springer.
  13. Yonatan Bisk, Ari Holtzman, Jesse Thomason, Jacob Andreas, Yoshua Bengio, Joyce Chai, Mirella Lap- ata, Angeliki Lazaridou, Jonathan May, Aleksandr Nisnevich, Nicolas Pinto, and Joseph Turian. 2020. Experience grounds language. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 8718-8735.
  14. ACL.
  15. Dan Bohus and Eric Horvitz. 2014. Managing human- robot engagement with forecasts and... um... hesita- tions. In Proceedings of the 16th International Con- ference on Multimodal Interaction, page 2-9. ACM.
  16. Dan Bohus, Ece Kamar, and Eric Horvitz. 2012. To- wards situated collaboration. In NAACL-HLT Work- shop on Future Directions and Needs in the Spoken Dialog Community: Tools and Data, pages 13-14.
  17. ACL.
  18. Dan Bohus and Alexander I. Rudnicky. 2009. The ravenclaw dialog management framework: Architec- ture and systems. Computer Speech and Language, 23(3):332-361.
  19. Susan E Brennan. 1991. Conversation with and through computers. User modeling and user- adapted interaction, 1(1):67-86.
  20. Susan E. Brennan. 1998. The grounding problem in conversations with and through computers. In S. R. Fussell and R. J. Kreuz, editors, Social and Cog- nitive Approaches to Interpersonal Communication, pages 201-225.
  21. Hyundong Cho and Jonathan May. 2020. Grounding conversations with improvised dialogues. In Pro- ceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics, pages 2398- 2413. ACL.
  22. Baran J Ciocci SR. 1998. The use of conversational repair strategies by children who are deaf. American Annals of the Deaf, 143(3):235-45.
  23. Eve Clark. 2001. Grounding and attention in the acqui- sition of language. In Proceedings of the 37th meet- ing of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pages 95-116.
  24. Herbert Clark. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
  25. Herbert H. Clark and Deanna Wilkes-Gibbs. 1986. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22(1):1 -39.
  26. Jeremy H. Clear. 1993. The British National Corpus, pages 163-187. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  27. Abhishek Das, Satwik Kottur, Khushi Gupta, Avi Singh, Deshraj Yadav, José M.F. Moura, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. 2017. Visual Dialog. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 326-335.
  28. Alexandre Denis. 2010. Generating referring expres- sions with reference domain theory. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Natural Language Gener- ation Conference. ACL.
  29. Alexandre Denis, Guillaume Pitel, Matthieu Quignard, and Patrick Blackburn. 2007. Incorporating asym- metric and asynchronous evidence of understanding in a grounding model. In 11th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue-DECALOG 2007.
  30. David DeVault, Iris Oved, and Matthew Stone. 2006. Societal grounding is essential to meaningful lan- guage use. In Proceedings, The Twenty-First Na- tional Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Eighteenth Innovative Applications of Artificial In- telligence Conference, pages 747-754. AAAI Press.
  31. David DeVault, Kenji Sagae, and David Traum. 2009. Can I finish? learning when to respond to incremen- tal interpretation results in interactive dialogue. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGDIAL Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue. ACL.
  32. David DeVault and Matthew Stone. 2009. Learning to interpret utterances using dialogue history. In Pro- ceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL, pages 184-192. ACL.
  33. David DeVault and David Traum. 2013. A method for the approximation of incremental understanding of explicit utterance meaning using predictive models in finite domains. In Proceedings of the 2013 Con- ference of the North American Chapter of the Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics: Human Lan- guage Technologies, pages 1092-1099. ACL.
  34. Hubert Dreyfus. 1972. What Computers Can't Do. MIT Press.
  35. Myroslava O. Dzikovska, Peter Bell, Amy Isard, and Johanna D. Moore. 2012. Evaluating language un- derstanding accuracy with respect to objective out- comes in a dialogue system. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the As- sociation for Computational Linguistics, pages 471- 481. ACL.
  36. Myroslava O. Dzikovska, Johanna D. Moore, Natalie Steinhauser, and Gwendolyn Campbell. 2010. The impact of interpretation problems on tutorial dia- logue. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 43-48. ACL.
  37. Layla El Asri, Hannes Schulz, Shikhar Sharma, Jeremie Zumer, Justin Harris, Emery Fine, Rahul Mehrotra, and Kaheer Suleman. 2017. Frames: a corpus for adding memory to goal-oriented dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 207-219, Saarbrücken, Germany. ACL.
  38. Mihail Eric, Lakshmi Krishnan, Francois Charette, and Christopher D. Manning. 2017. Key-value retrieval networks for task-oriented dialogue. In Proceedings of the 18th SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dia- logue, pages 37-49, Saarbrücken, Germany. ACL.
  39. Arash Eshghi, Christine Howes, Eleni Gre- goromichelaki, Julian Hough, and Matthew Purver. 2015. Feedback in conversation as incre- mental semantic update. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Semantics, pages 261-271, London, UK. ACL.
  40. Raquel Fernandez. 2006. Non-sentential utterances in dialogue: Classification, resolution and use. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.
  41. Raquel Fernández, Jonathan Ginzburg, and Shalom Lappin. 2007. Classifying non-sentential utterances in dialogue: A machine learning approach. Compu- tational Linguistics, 33(3):397-427.
  42. Mary Ellen Foster, Andre Gaschler, and Manuel Giu- liani. 2017. Automatically classifying user engage- ment for dynamic multi-party human-robot inter- action. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9(5):659-674.
  43. Mary Ellen Foster, Simon Keizer, and Oliver Lemon. 2014. Towards action selection under uncertainty for a socially aware robot bartender. In ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interac- tion, pages 158-159.
  44. Raefer Gabriel, Yang Liu, Anna Gottardi, Mihail Eric, Anju Khatri, Anjali Chadha, Qinlang Chen, Behnam Hedayatnia, Pankaj Rajan, Ali Binici, Shui Hu, Karthik Gopalakrishnan, Seokhwan Kim, Lauren Stubel, Kate Bland, Arindam Mandal, and Dilek Hakkani-Tür. 2020. Further advances in open do- main dialog systems in the third alexa prize socialbot grand challenge. Proceedings of the Alexa Prize.
  45. Kallirroi Georgila, James Henderson, and Oliver Lemon. 2005. Learning user simulations for infor- mation state update dialogue systems. In Ninth Eu- ropean Conference on Speech Communication and Technology.
  46. Jonathan Ginzburg. 2012. The Interactive Stance. Ox- ford Press.
  47. Roberta Golinkoff. 1986. 'I beg your pardon?': the preverbal negotiation of failed messages. Journal of child language, 13:455-76.
  48. Agustín Gravano and Julia Hirschberg. 2011. Turn- taking cues in task-oriented dialogue. Computer Speech and Language, 25(3):601-634.
  49. Janosch Haber, Tim Baumgärtner, Ece Takmaz, Lieke Gelderloos, Elia Bruni, and Raquel Fernández. 2019. The PhotoBook dataset: Building common ground through visually-grounded dialogue. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1895-1910. ACL.
  50. Stevan Harnad. 1990. The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1):335 -346.
  51. He He, Anusha Balakrishnan, Mihail Eric, and Percy Liang. 2017. Learning symmetric collaborative di- alogue agents with dynamic knowledge graph em- beddings. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1766-1776, Vancouver, Canada. ACL.
  52. Martin Heidegger. 1993. The end of philosophy and the task of thinking. Basic Writings, pages 427-449.
  53. Julian Hough and David Schlangen. 2017. It's not what you do, it's how you do it: Grounding uncertainty for a simple robot. In Proceedings of the Inter- national Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 274-282. ACM.
  54. Nikolai Ilinykh, Sina Zarrieß, and David Schlangen. 2019. Meet up! a corpus of joint activity dialogues in a visual environment. In Proceedings of the 23rd Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dia- logue, London, United Kingdom.
  55. Srinivasan Janarthanam and Oliver Lemon. 2009. Learning lexical alignment policies for generating referring expressions for spoken dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 12th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (ENLG 2009), pages 74-81. ACL.
  56. Loveland Katherin, Robin McEvoy, and Belgin Tunali. 1990. Narrative story telling in autism and down's syndrome. British Journal of Developmental Psy- chology, 8(1):9-23.
  57. Jin-Hwa Kim, Nikita Kitaev, Xinlei Chen, Marcus Rohrbach, Byoung-Tak Zhang, Yuandong Tian, Dhruv Batra, and Devi Parikh. 2019. Codraw: Col- laborative drawing as a testbed for grounded goal- driven communication. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2019, pages 6495-6513. ACL.
  58. Nikolina Koleva, Martín Villalba, Maria Staudte, and Alexander Koller. 2015. The impact of listener gaze on predicting reference resolution. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 812-817. ACL.
  59. Alexander Koller, Konstantina Garoufi, Maria Staudte, and Matthew Crocker. 2012. Enhancing referential success by tracking hearer gaze. In Proceedings of the 13th Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 30-39. ACL.
  60. Dimosthenis Kontogiorgos, Elena Sibirtseva, and Joakim Gustafson. 2020. Chinese whispers: A mul- timodal dataset for embodied language grounding. In Proceedings of The 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 743-749, Marseille, France. European Language Resources Association.
  61. Satwik Kottur, José M. F. Moura, Devi Parikh, Dhruv Batra, and Marcus Rohrbach. 2019. CLEVR-dialog: A diagnostic dataset for multi-round reasoning in vi- sual dialog. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 582-595, Min- neapolis, Minnesota. ACL.
  62. Staffan Larsson. 2018. Grounding as a side-effect of grounding. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(2):389- 408.
  63. Jiwei Li, Michel Galley, Chris Brockett, Jianfeng Gao, and Bill Dolan. 2016. A diversity-promoting objec- tive function for neural conversation models. In Pro- ceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North Amer- ican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 110-119. ACL.
  64. Pierre Lison and Casey Kennington. 2016. OpenDial: A toolkit for developing spoken dialogue systems with probabilistic rules. In Proceedings of ACL- 2016 System Demonstrations, pages 67-72, Berlin, Germany. ACL.
  65. Chia-Wei Liu, Ryan Lowe, Iulian Serban, Mike Nose- worthy, Laurent Charlin, and Joelle Pineau. 2016. How NOT to evaluate your dialogue system: An em- pirical study of unsupervised evaluation metrics for dialogue response generation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2122-2132. ACL.
  66. Nitika Mathur, Timothy Baldwin, and Trevor Cohn. 2020. Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the eval- uation of automatic machine translation evaluation metrics. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 4984-4997. ACL.
  67. Maurice Merleau-Ponty. 1962. Phenomenology of Per- ception. Routledge.
  68. Anjali Narayan-Chen, Prashant Jayannavar, and Ju- lia Hockenmaier. 2019. Collaborative dialogue in Minecraft. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 5405-5415, Florence, Italy. ACL.
  69. Yixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal, Jason Weston, and Douwe Kiela. 2020. Ad- versarial NLI: A new benchmark for natural lan- guage understanding. In Proceedings of the 58th An- nual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 4885-4901. Association for Com- putational Linguistics.
  70. Judea Pearl. 2009. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, USA.
  71. Matthew Purver. 2004. The Theory and Use of Clari- fication Requests in Dialogue. Ph.D. thesis, King's College, University of London.
  72. Matthew Purver, Julian Hough, and Christine Howes. 2018. Computational models of miscommunica- tion phenomena. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(2):425-451.
  73. Ashwin Ram, Rohit Prasad, Chandra Khatri, Anu Venkatesh, Raefer Gabriel, Qing Liu, Jeff Nunn, Behnam Hedayatnia, Ming Cheng, Ashish Nagar, Eric King, Kate Bland, Amanda Wartick, Yi Pan, Han Song, Sk Jayadevan, Gene Hwang, and Art Pet- tigrue. 2018. Conversational AI: the science behind the alexa prize. arXiv, abs/1801.03604. · arXiv
  74. Verena Rieser and Oliver Lemon. 2011. Reinforce- ment learning for adaptive dialogue systems: a data- driven methodology for dialogue management and natural language generation. Springer Science & Business Media.
  75. Verena Rieser, Oliver Lemon, and Xingkun Liu. 2010. Optimising information presentation for spoken dia- logue systems. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics, pages 1009-1018. ACL.
  76. Deb Roy and Ehud Reiter. 2005. Connecting language to the world. Artificial Intelligence, 167(1):1 -12.
  77. Chinnadhurai Sankar, Sandeep Subramanian, Chris Pal, Sarath Chandar, and Yoshua Bengio. 2019. Do neu- ral dialog systems use the conversation history effec- tively? an empirical study. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Compu- tational Linguistics, pages 32-37. ACL.
  78. Emanuel Schegloff. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, vol- ume 1. Cambridge University Press.
  79. Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the or- ganization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2):361-382.
  80. David Schlangen and Gabriel Skantze. 2009. A gen- eral, abstract model of incremental dialogue process- ing. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL, pages 710-718. ACL.
  81. Ethan O. Selfridge, Iker Arizmendi, Peter A. Heeman, and Jason D. Williams. 2012. Integrating incremen- tal speech recognition and POMDP-based dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dia- logue, pages 275-279, Seoul, South Korea. ACL.
  82. Iulian V. Serban, Alessandro Sordoni, Yoshua Bengio, Aaron Courville, and Joelle Pineau. 2016. Building end-to-end dialogue systems using generative hierar- chical neural network models. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Conference on Artificial Intelligence, page 3776-3783. AAAI Press.
  83. Murray Shanahan. 2016. The Frame Problem. In Ed- ward N. Zalta, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, spring 2016 edition. Metaphysics Re- search Lab, Stanford University.
  84. Ravi Shekhar, Aashish Venkatesh, Tim Baumgärtner, Elia Bruni, Barbara Plank, Raffaella Bernardi, and Raquel Fernández. 2019. Beyond task success: A closer look at jointly learning to see, ask, and Guess- What. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics, pages 2578-2587. ACL.
  85. Todd Shore, Theofronia Androulakaki, and Gabriel Skantze. 2018. KTH tangrams: A dataset for re- search on alignment and conceptual pacts in task- oriented dialogue. In Proceedings of the Eleventh In- ternational Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), Miyazaki, Japan. Euro- pean Language Resources Association (ELRA).
  86. Eric Michael Smith, Mary Williamson, Kurt Shuster, Jason Weston, and Y-Lan Boureau. 2020. Can you put it all together: Evaluating conversational agents' ability to blend skills. In Proceedings of the 58th An- nual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 2021-2030. ACL.
  87. Svetlana Stoyanchev, Alex Liu, and Julia Hirschberg. 2013. Modelling human clarification strategies. In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2013 Conference, pages 137-141, Metz, France. ACL.
  88. Ryuichi Takanobu, Qi Zhu, Jinchao Li, Baolin Peng, Jianfeng Gao, and Minlie Huang. 2020. Is your goal- oriented dialog model performing really well? em- pirical analysis of system-wise evaluation. In Pro- ceedings of the 21th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 297-310. ACL.
  89. Xiang Zhi Tan, Sean Andrist, Dan Bohus, and Eric Horvitz. 2020. Now, over here: Leveraging ex- tended attentional capabilities in human-robot inter- action. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE Inter- national Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, page 468-470, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
  90. Michael Tomasello, Malinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Tanya Behne, and Henrike Moll. 2005. Under- standing and sharing intentions: The origins of cul- tural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5):675-691.
  91. David Traum and Staffan Larsson. 2003. The infor- mation state approach to dialogue management. In Jan van Kuppevelt and Ronnie Smith, editors, Cur- rent and New Directions in Discourse and Dialogue, pages 325-353. Kluwer.
  92. Stefan Ultes, Paweł Budzianowski, Iñigo Casanueva, Lina M. Rojas-Barahona, Bo-Hsiang Tseng, Yen- Chen Wu, Steve Young, and Milica Gašić. 2018. Ad- dressing objects and their relations: The conversa- tional entity dialogue model. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dia- logue, pages 273-283. ACL.
  93. Jack Urbanek, Angela Fan, Siddharth Karamcheti, Saachi Jain, Samuel Humeau, Emily Dinan, Tim Rocktäschel, Douwe Kiela, Arthur Szlam, and Ja- son Weston. 2019. Learning to speak and act in a fantasy text adventure game. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 673-683. ACL.
  94. Martín Villalba, Christoph Teichmann, and Alexander Koller. 2017. Generating contrastive referring ex- pressions. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 678-687, Vancouver, Canada. ACL.
  95. Harm de Vries, Dzmitry Bahdanau, and Christo- pher D. Manning. 2020. Towards ecologically valid research on language user interfaces. arXiv, abs/2007.14435. · arXiv
  96. Harm de Vries, Kurt Shuster, Dhruv Batra, Devi Parikh, Jason Weston, and Douwe Kiela. 2018. Talk the walk: Navigating new york city through grounded dialogue. CoRR, abs/1807.03367. · arXiv
  97. Harm de Vries, Florian Strub, Sarath Chandar, Olivier Pietquin, Hugo Larochelle, and Aaron C. Courville. 2017. Guesswhat?! visual object discovery through multi-modal dialogue. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4466-4475. IEEE Computer Society.
  98. Marilyn A. Walker, Diane J. Litman, Candace A. Kamm, and Alicia Abella. 1997. PARADISE: A framework for evaluating spoken dialogue agents. In 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics and 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, pages 271-280, Madrid, Spain. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  99. Luca Weihs, Jordi Salvador, Klemen Kotar, Unnat Jain, Kuo-Hao Zeng, Roozbeh Mottaghi, and Aniruddha Kembhavi. 2020. Allenact: A framework for em- bodied ai research. arXiv.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Benotti, L., & Blackburn, P.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Roskilde University (DK)
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume
Publisher
Association for Computational Linguistics
Published
2021
Pages
515-531
DOI
10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.41
OpenAlex
W3155579973
Cited by
14
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.50
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RUCforsk (Roskilde University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
human-human dialogue, negotiation of meaning, error recovery, cooperative learning, language acquisition, dialogue systems, interactive systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review