Adaptive Information Seeking for Open-Domain Question Answering
Open accessAbstract
Information seeking is an essential step for open-domain question answering to efficiently gather evidence from a large corpus.Recently, iterative approaches have been proven to be effective for complex questions, by recursively retrieving new evidence at each step.However, almost all existing iterative approaches use predefined strategies, either applying the same retrieval function multiple times or fixing the order of different retrieval functions, which cannot fulfill the diverse requirements of various questions.In this paper, we propose a novel adaptive information-seeking strategy for open-domain question answering, namely AISO.Specifically, the whole retrieval and answer process is modeled as a partially observed Markov decision process, where three types of retrieval operations (e.g., BM25, DPR, and hyperlink) and one answer operation are defined as actions.According to the learned policy, AISO could adaptively select a proper retrieval action to seek the missing evidence at each step, based on the collected evidence and the reformulated query, or directly output the answer when the evidence set is sufficient for the question.Experiments on SQuAD Open and HotpotQA fullwiki, which serve as single-hop and multi-hop open-domain QA benchmarks, show that AISO outperforms all baseline methods with predefined strategies in terms of both retrieval and answer evaluations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior graph-augmented retrieval work trains a re-ranking module that can traverse a graph made using Wikipedia hyperlinks.
“In this second category, previous work trains a re-ranking module which can traverse a graph made using Wikipedia hyperlinks [16, 100, 54, 14, 4, 44].”
From HippoRAG: Neurobiologically Inspired Long-Term Memory for Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [100]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Zhu, Y., Pang, L., Lan, Y., Shen, H., & Cheng, X.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 3615-3626
- OpenAlex
- W3198963570
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12
- FWCI
- 4.77
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (91746301, 61773362, 61906180)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- open-domain question answering, iterative retrieval, partially observable Markov decision processes, BM25, DPR, multi-hop question answering, HotpotQA
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review