Cited by 61Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsTopic ModelingHandwritten Text Recognition Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SciCap: Generating Captions for Scientific Figures

Open access
Hsu, Ting-Yao, Giles, C Lee, Huang, Ting-Hao·2021·Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021

Abstract

Researchers use figures to communicate rich, complex information in scientific papers.The captions of these figures are critical to conveying effective messages.However, low-quality figure captions commonly occur in scientific articles and may decrease understanding.In this paper, we propose an end-to-end neural framework to automatically generate informative, high-quality captions for scientific figures.To this end, we introduce SCICAP, 1 a largescale figure-caption dataset based on computer science arXiv papers published between 2010 and 2020.After pre-processing -including figure-type classification, sub-figure identification, text normalization, and caption text selection -SCICAP contained more than two million figures extracted from over 290,000 papers.We then established baseline models that caption graph plots, the dominant (19.2%) figure type.The experimental results showed both opportunities and steep challenges of generating captions for scientific figures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.277

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Iz Beltagy, Kyle Lo, and Arman Cohan. 2019. Scib- ert: Pretrained language model for scientific text. In EMNLP.
  2. Christopher Clark and Santosh Divvala. 2016. Pdf- figures 2.0: Mining figures from research papers. In 2016 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Li- braries (JCDL), pages 143-152. IEEE.
  3. Saiganesh Swaminathan, Thijs Roumen, Robert Ko- vacs, David Stangl, Stefanie Mueller, and Patrick Baudisch. 2016. Linespace: A sensemaking plat- form for the blind. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Sys- tems, pages 2175-2185. ACM.
  4. Shaomei Wu, Jeffrey Wieland, Omid Farivar, and Julie Schiller. 2017. Automatic alt-text: Computer- generated image descriptions for blind users on a so- cial network service. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Coopera- tive Work and Social Computing, pages 1180-1192. ACM.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 61

Metadata

Authors
Hsu, T.-Y., Giles, C. L., & Huang, T.-H.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021
Published
2021
Pages
3258-3264
OpenAlex
W3210140424
Cited by
59
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.86
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Strong
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Keywords
automatic caption generation, scientific figures, figure captions, text normalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review