Cited by 72Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Increasing Diversity While Maintaining Accuracy: Text Data Generation with Large Language Models and Human Interventions

Open access
Chung, John, Kamar, Ece, Amershi, Saleema·2023·Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) can be used to generate text data for training and evaluating other models.However, creating highquality datasets with LLMs can be challenging.In this work, we explore human-AI partnerships to facilitate high diversity and accuracy in LLM-based text data generation.We first examine two approaches to diversify text generation: 1) logit suppression, which minimizes the generation of languages that have already been frequently generated, and 2) temperature sampling, which flattens the token sampling probability.We found that diversification approaches can increase data diversity but often at the cost of data accuracy (i.e., text and labels being appropriate for the target domain).To address this issue, we examined two human interventions, 1) label replacement (LR), correcting misaligned labels, and 2) out-of-scope filtering (OOSF), removing instances that are out of the user's domain of interest or to which no considered label applies.With oracle studies, we found that LR increases the absolute accuracy of models trained with diversified datasets by 14.4%.Moreover, we found that some models trained with data generated with LR interventions outperformed LLM-based few-shot classification.In contrast, OOSF was not effective in increasing model accuracy, implying the need for future work in human-in-the-loop text data generation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.34

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 72

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Chris Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Ma- teusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. In Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 1877-1901.
  2. Ángel Alexander Cabrera, Abraham J. Druck, Jason I. Hong, and Adam Perer. 2021. Discovering and val- idating ai errors with crowdsourced failure reports. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 5(CSCW2). · DOI
  3. Franck Dernoncourt and Ji Young Lee. 2017. PubMed 200k RCT: a dataset for sequential sentence clas- sification in medical abstracts. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Natu- ral Language Processing (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 308-313, Taipei, Taiwan. Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing.
  4. Marzieh Fadaee, Arianna Bisazza, and Christof Monz. 2017. Data augmentation for low-resource neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 55th An- nual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 567-573, Vancouver, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Ian J. Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. 2016. Deep Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. http://www.deeplearningbook.org.
  6. Yutai Hou, Yijia Liu, Wanxiang Che, and Ting Liu. 2018. Sequence-to-sequence data augmentation for dialogue language understanding. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computa- tional Linguistics, pages 1234-1245, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. Association for Computational Lin- guistics.
  7. Samuel Rhys Cox, Yunlong Wang, Ashraf Abdul, Chris- tian von der Weth, and Brian Y. Lim. 2021. Directed diversity: Leveraging language embedding distances for collective creativity in crowd ideation. In Pro- ceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '21, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. · DOI
  8. Ann Yuan, Daphne Ippolito, Vitaly Nikolaev, Chris Callison-Burch, Andy Coenen, and Sebastian Gehrmann. 2021. Synthbio: A case study in faster curation of text datasets. In Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2).

Authors
Chung, J., Kamar, E., & Amershi, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2023
Pages
575-593
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385570982
Cited by
72
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 6
FWCI
12.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Microsoft Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
synthetic training data, data diversity, data accuracy, temperature sampling, human-AI collaboration, human-in-the-loop, few-shot classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review