Cited by 1Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

McGill BabyLM Shared Task Submission: The Effects of Data Formatting and Structural Biases

Open access
Cheng, Ziling, Aralikatte, Rahul, Porada, Ian, Spinoso-Di Piano, Cesare, Cheung, Jackie CK·2023·Proceedings of the BabyLM Challenge at the 27th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning

Abstract

In this study, we describe our submission to the 2023 BabyLM shared-task's strict-small track.Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of training high-performing models within the constraints of limited data, computational resources, and time.We provide evidence that the formatting of input can significantly impact downstream performance.Furthermore, the induction of structural biases into the models through the use of part-of-speech trees yields modest benefits.Our most successful model achieves 79% on the BLiMP evaluations and 72% on the SuperGLUE evaluations.All models trained during this study can be found at https://huggingface.co/mcgill- babylm.12

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2023.conll-babylm.18

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understand- ing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805. · arXiv
  2. Dan Hendrycks and Kevin Gimpel. 2016. Gaus- sian error linear units (gelus). arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08415. · arXiv
  3. Jordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Men- sch, Elena Buchatskaya, Trevor Cai, Eliza Ruther- ford, Diego de las Casas, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Jo- hannes Welbl, Aidan Clark, Tom Hennigan, Eric Noland, Katherine Millican, George van den Driess- che, Bogdan Damoc, Aurelia Guy, Simon Osin- dero, Karen Simonyan, Erich Elsen, Oriol Vinyals, Jack William Rae, and Laurent Sifre. 2022. An em- pirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model training. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
  4. Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Man- dar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining ap- proach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692. · arXiv
  5. Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. 2017. Decou- pled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101. · arXiv
  6. Mitchell P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computa- tional Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
  7. Stephen Merity, Caiming Xiong, James Bradbury, and Richard Socher. 2017. Pointer sentinel mixture models. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  8. Laura Pérez-Mayos, Miguel Ballesteros, and Leo Wan- ner. 2021. How much pretraining data do language models need to learn syntax? In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natu- ral Language Processing, pages 1571-1582, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  9. Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. 2019. Lan- guage models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8):9.
  10. Yikang Shen, Shawn Tan, Alessandro Sordoni, and Aaron Courville. 2019. Ordered neurons: Integrat- ing tree structures into recurrent neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representa- tions.
  11. Yi Tay, Mostafa Dehghani, Vinh Q Tran, Xavier Gar- cia, Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Hyung Won Chung, Dara Bahri, Tal Schuster, Steven Zheng, et al. 2022. Ul2: Unifying language learning paradigms. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations.
  12. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information process- ing systems, 30.
  13. Alex Wang, Yada Pruksachatkun, Nikita Nangia, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel Bowman. 2019a. Superglue: A stickier benchmark for general-purpose language understanding systems. Advances in neural infor- mation processing systems, 32.
  14. Alex Wang, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel R Bowman. 2018. Glue: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  15. Yaushian Wang, Hung-Yi Lee, and Yun-Nung Chen. 2019b. Tree transformer: Integrating tree structures into self-attention. In Proceedings of the 2019 Con- ference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Confer- ence on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP- IJCNLP), pages 1061-1070, Hong Kong, China. As- sociation for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  16. Alex Warstadt, Alicia Parrish, Haokun Liu, Anhad Mo- hananey, Wei Peng, Sheng-Fu Wang, and Samuel R. Bowman. 2020a. BLiMP: The benchmark of lin- guistic minimal pairs for English. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8:377-392. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Alex Warstadt, Alicia Parrish, Haokun Liu, Anhad Mo- hananey, Wei Peng, Sheng-Fu Wang, and Samuel R Bowman. 2020b. Blimp: The benchmark of linguis- tic minimal pairs for english. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8:377- 392.
  18. Alex Warstadt, Yian Zhang, Xiaocheng Li, Haokun Liu, and Samuel R. Bowman. 2020c. Learning which features matter: RoBERTa acquires a pref- erence for linguistic generalizations (eventually). In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Em- pirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 217-235, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  19. Yonghui Wu, Mike Schuster, Zhifeng Chen, Quoc V Le, Mohammad Norouzi, Wolfgang Macherey, Maxim Krikun, Yuan Cao, Qin Gao, Klaus Macherey, et al. 2016. Google's neural ma- chine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08144. · arXiv
  20. Aditya Yedetore, Tal Linzen, Robert Frank, and R. Thomas McCoy. 2023. How poor is the stimu- lus? evaluating hierarchical generalization in neural networks trained on child-directed speech. In Pro- ceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 9370-9393, Toronto, Canada. Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, Z., Aralikatte, R., Porada, I., Spinoso-Di Piano, C., & Cheung, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (CA)
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
Venue
Proceedings of the BabyLM Challenge at the 27th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning
Published
2023
Pages
179-192
OpenAlex
W4389524117
Cited by
1
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.16
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
BabyLM Challenge (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Nvidia
  • McGill University
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
BabyLM, small language models, structural bias, blimp, SuperGLUE

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review