Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models with Iterative Retrieval-Generation Synergy
Open accessAbstract
Retrieval-augmented generation has raise extensive attention as it is promising to address the limitations of large language models including outdated knowledge and hallucinations.However, retrievers struggle to capture relevance, especially for queries with complex information needs.Recent work has proposed to improve relevance modeling by having large language models actively involved in retrieval, i.e., to guide retrieval with generation.In this paper, we show that strong performance can be achieved by a method we call ITER-RETGEN, which synergizes retrieval and generation in an iterative manner: a model's response to a task input shows what might be needed to finish the task, and thus can serve as an informative context for retrieving more relevant knowledge which in turn helps generate a better response in another iteration.Compared with recent work which interleaves retrieval with generation when completing a single output, ITER-RETGEN processes all retrieved knowledge as a whole and largely preserves the flexibility in generation without structural constraints.We evaluate ITER-RETGEN on multi-hop question answering, fact verification, and commonsense reasoning, and show that it can flexibly leverage parametric knowledge and non-parametric knowledge, and is superior to or competitive with state-of-the-art retrieval-augmented baselines while causing fewer overheads of retrieval and generation.We can further improve performance via generation-augmented retrieval adaptation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More sophisticated RAG methods are able to integrate information across new or updated knowledge elements.
“More sophisticated RAG methods, which perform multiple steps of retrieval and generation from an LLM, are even able to integrate information across new or updated knowledge elements[38, 64, 72, 78, 88, 90, 92], another crucial aspect of long-term memory systems.”
From HippoRAG: Neurobiologically Inspired Long-Term Memory for Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [72]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 200
- Authors
- Shao, Z., Gong, Y., Shen, Y., Huang, M., Duan, N., & Chen, W.
- Affiliations
- State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology and Systems (CN)
- Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 9248-9274
- OpenAlex
- W4389520468
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 77 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 35.44
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61936010)
- Tsinghua University
- National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (62125604)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- retrieval-augmented generation, large language models, multi-hop question answering, fact-checking, commonsense reasoning, hallucination mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review