Cited by 200Topic ModelingInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models with Iterative Retrieval-Generation Synergy

Open access
Shao, Zhihong, Gong, Yeyun, Shen, Yelong, Huang, Minlie, Duan, Nan, Chen, Weizhu·2023·Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023

Abstract

Retrieval-augmented generation has raise extensive attention as it is promising to address the limitations of large language models including outdated knowledge and hallucinations.However, retrievers struggle to capture relevance, especially for queries with complex information needs.Recent work has proposed to improve relevance modeling by having large language models actively involved in retrieval, i.e., to guide retrieval with generation.In this paper, we show that strong performance can be achieved by a method we call ITER-RETGEN, which synergizes retrieval and generation in an iterative manner: a model's response to a task input shows what might be needed to finish the task, and thus can serve as an informative context for retrieving more relevant knowledge which in turn helps generate a better response in another iteration.Compared with recent work which interleaves retrieval with generation when completing a single output, ITER-RETGEN processes all retrieved knowledge as a whole and largely preserves the flexibility in generation without structural constraints.We evaluate ITER-RETGEN on multi-hop question answering, fact verification, and commonsense reasoning, and show that it can flexibly leverage parametric knowledge and non-parametric knowledge, and is superior to or competitive with state-of-the-art retrieval-augmented baselines while causing fewer overheads of retrieval and generation.We can further improve performance via generation-augmented retrieval adaptation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.620

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More sophisticated RAG methods are able to integrate information across new or updated knowledge elements.

    “More sophisticated RAG methods, which perform multiple steps of retrieval and generation from an LLM, are even able to integrate information across new or updated knowledge elements[38, 64, 72, 78, 88, 90, 92], another crucial aspect of long-term memory systems.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 200

Authors
Shao, Z., Gong, Y., Shen, Y., Huang, M., Duan, N., & Chen, W.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology and Systems (CN)
  • Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023
Published
2023
Pages
9248-9274
OpenAlex
W4389520468
Cited by
200
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 3
FWCI
35.44
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61936010)
  • Tsinghua University
  • National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (62125604)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
retrieval-augmented generation, large language models, multi-hop question answering, fact-checking, commonsense reasoning, hallucination mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review