The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating Layer Importance in Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) have gained increasing attention due to their prominent ability to understand and process texts.Nevertheless, LLMs largely remain opaque.The lack of understanding of LLMs has obstructed the deployment in safety-critical scenarios and hindered the development of better models.In this study, we advance the understanding of LLM by investigating the significance of individual layers in LLMs.We propose an efficient sampling method to faithfully evaluate the importance of layers using Shapley values, a widely used explanation framework in feature attribution and data valuation.In addition, we conduct layer ablation experiments to assess the performance degradation resulting from the exclusion of specific layers.Our findings reveal the existence of cornerstone layers, wherein certain early layers can exhibit a dominant contribution over others.Removing one cornerstone layer leads to a drastic collapse of the model performance, often reducing it to random guessing.Conversely, removing non-cornerstone layers results in only marginal performance changes.This study identifies cornerstone layers in LLMs and underscores their critical role for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Different layers of LLMs vary in their importance and process information at different levels of granularity.
“Previous studies (Wang and Tu, 2020; Zhang et al., 2024; Skean et al., 2025) have shown that different layers of LLMs vary in their importance and process information at different levels of granularity.”
From EvolKV: Evolutionary KV Cache Compression for LLM Inference (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2024
The ‘Cornerstone Layers’ section reports that early layers contribute substantially more to model performance than other layers. Section 6.4 hypothesizes different roles for cornerstone and non-cornerstone layers, but does not establish that they process information at different levels of granularity. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThese heuristics fail to account for the varying functional roles of transformer layers in information processing.
“these heuristics fail to account for two critical aspects: (1) the varying functional roles of transformer layers in information processing (Wang and Tu, 2020; Zhang et al., 2024; Skean et al., 2025)”
From EvolKV: Evolutionary KV Cache Compression for LLM Inference (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M.-A., Lacroix, T., Rozière, B., Goyal, N., Hambro, E., Azhar, F., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.13971 · Cited by 4,602
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Emily M. Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan- Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language mod- els be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Trans- parency, FAccT '21, page 610-623, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. · DOI · Paper page
- Yonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao, and Yejin Choi. 2020. Piqa: Reasoning about physical commonsense in natural language. In Thirty- Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
- Tolga Bolukbasi, Kai-Wei Chang, James Y Zou, Venkatesh Saligrama, and Adam T Kalai. 2016. Man is to computer programmer as woman is to home- maker? debiasing word embeddings. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29.
- Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877-1901.
- Ziqiang Cao, Furu Wei, Wenjie Li, and Sujian Li. 2018. Faithful to the original: Fact aware neural abstractive summarization. In Proceedings of the AAAI Confer- ence on Artificial Intelligence, volume 32.
- Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, Ming-Wei Chang, Tom Kwiatkowski, Michael Collins, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019a. BoolQ: Exploring the surprising difficulty of natural yes/no questions. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 2924-2936, Minneapolis, Min- nesota. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Kevin Clark, Urvashi Khandelwal, Omer Levy, and Christopher D Manning. 2019b. What does bert look at? an analysis of bert's attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.04341. · arXiv
- Peter Clark, Isaac Cowhey, Oren Etzioni, Tushar Khot, Ashish Sabharwal, Carissa Schoenick, and Oyvind Tafjord. 2018. Think you have solved question answering? try arc, the ai2 reasoning challenge. arXiv:1803.05457v1. · arXiv
- Sumanth Dathathri, Andrea Madotto, Janice Lan, Jane Hung, Eric Frank, Piero Molino, Jason Yosinski, and Rosanne Liu. 2019. Plug and play language models: A simple approach to controlled text generation. In International Conference on Learning Representa- tions.
- Nikhil Garg, Londa Schiebinger, Dan Jurafsky, and James Zou. 2018. Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(16):E3635- E3644.
- Amirata Ghorbani and James Y Zou. 2020. Neuron shapley: Discovering the responsible neurons. Ad- vances in neural information processing systems, 33:5922-5932.
- Andrey Gromov, Kushal Tirumala, Hassan Shapourian, Paolo Glorioso, and Daniel A Roberts. 2024. The un- reasonable ineffectiveness of the deeper layers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.17887. · arXiv
- Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2020. Measuring massive multitask language under- standing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300. · arXiv
- Jiaxin Huang, Shixiang Shane Gu, Le Hou, Yuexin Wu, Xuezhi Wang, Hongkun Yu, and Jiawei Han. 2023. Large language models can self-improve. In The 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
- Albert Q Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Antoine Roux, Arthur Mensch, Blanche Savary, Chris Bam- ford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Emma Bou Hanna, Florian Bressand, et al. 2024. Mixtral of experts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04088. · arXiv
- Masahiro Kaneko and Danushka Bollegala. 2021. Debi- asing pre-trained contextualised embeddings. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.09523. · arXiv
- Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017. A unified ap- proach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
- Kevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, and Yonatan Belinkov. 2022. Locating and editing factual asso- ciations in GPT. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36. ArXiv:2202.05262. · arXiv
- Paul Michel, Omer Levy, and Graham Neubig. 2019. Are sixteen heads really better than one? Advances in neural information processing systems, 32.
- Todor Mihaylov, Peter Clark, Tushar Khot, and Ashish Sabharwal. 2018. Can a suit of armor conduct elec- tricity? a new dataset for open book question answer- ing. In EMNLP.
- Koyena Pal, Jiuding Sun, Andrew Yuan, Byron C Wal- lace, and David Bau. 2023. Future lens: Anticipating subsequent tokens from a single hidden state. In Pro- ceedings of the 27th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 548- 560.
- Keisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavat- ula, and Yejin Choi. 2019. Winogrande: An adver- sarial winograd schema challenge at scale. Preprint, arXiv:1907.10641. · arXiv
- Mingjie Sun, Xinlei Chen, J Zico Kolter, and Zhuang Liu. 2024. Massive activations in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17762. · arXiv
- Ian Tenney, Dipanjan Das, and Ellie Pavlick. 2019. Bert rediscovers the classical nlp pipeline. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 4593-4601.
- Ian Tenney, Patrick Xia, Berlin Chen, Alex Wang, Adam Poliak, R Thomas McCoy, Najoung Kim, Benjamin Van Durme, Samuel R Bowman, Dipanjan Das, et al. 2018. What do you learn from context? probing for sentence structure in contextualized word repre- sentations. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Al- bert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, et al. 2023b. Llama 2: Open founda- tion and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288. · arXiv
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
- BigScience Workshop, Teven Le Scao, Angela Fan, Christopher Akiki, Ellie Pavlick, Suzana Ilić, Daniel Hesslow, Roman Castagné, Alexandra Sasha Luc- cioni, François Yvon, et al. 2022. Bloom: A 176b- parameter open-access multilingual language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.05100. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EvolKV: Evolutionary KV Cache Compression for LLM Inference
Yu, B., & Chai, Y. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025 · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.88
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Dong, Y., & Kawaguchi, K.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- PayPal (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 7th BlackboxNLP Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 469-479
- OpenAlex
- W4404784116
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Keywords
- large language models, layer importance, Shapley value, explainable AI, feature attribution, model interpretability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review