CliMedBench: A Large-Scale Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Medical Large Language Models in Clinical Scenarios
Open accessAbstract
With the proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) in diverse domains, there is a particular need for unified evaluation standards in Chinese clinical medical scenarios, where models need to be examined very thoroughly.We present CliMedBench, a comprehensive benchmark with 14 expert-guided core clinical scenarios specifically designed to assess the medical ability of LLMs across 7 pivot dimensions 1 .It comprises 33,735 questions derived from real-world medical reports of top-tier tertiary hospitals and authentic examination exercises.The reliability of this benchmark has been confirmed in several ways.Subsequent experiments with existing LLMs have led to the following findings: (i) Chinese medical LLMs underperform on this benchmark, especially where medical reasoning and factual consistency are vital, underscoring the need for advances in clinical knowledge and diagnostic accuracy.(ii) Several general-domain LLMs demonstrate substantial potential in medical clinics, while the limited input capacity of many medical LLMs hinders their practical use.These findings reveal both the strengths and limitations of LLMs in clinical scenarios and offer critical insights for medical research.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These frameworks typically focus on narrow clinical scenarios (1-28 datasets), rely on limited data sources or synthetic data, and assess primarily accuracy without comprehensive taxonomy validation or deployment considerations.
“However, these frameworks typically focus on narrow clinical scenarios (1–28 datasets), rely on limited data sources or synthetic data, and assess primarily accuracy without comprehensive taxonomy validation or deployment considerations.”
From Holistic evaluation of large language models for medical tasks with MedHELM (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Holistic Evaluation of Language Models
Liang, P., Bommasani, R., Lee, T., Tsipras, D., Soylu, D., Yasunaga, M., Zhang, Y., Narayanan, D., Wu, Y., Kumar, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.09110 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Self-citationHuaTuo: Tuning LLaMA Model with Chinese Medical Knowledge
Wang, H., Liu, C., Xi, N., Qiang, Z., Zhao, S., Qin, B., & Liu, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.06975 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
PathVQA: 30000+ Questions for Medical Visual Question Answering
He, X., Zhang, Y., Mou, L., Xing, E., & Xie, P. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.10286 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationHuatuo-26M, a Large-scale Chinese Medical QA DatasetPreprint
Li, J., Wang, X., Wu, X., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.01526 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
RJUA-QA: A Comprehensive QA Dataset for UrologyPreprint
Lyu, S., Chi, C., Cai, H., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.09785 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Yan Cai, Linlin Wang, Ye Wang, Gerard de Melo, Ya Zhang, Yanfeng Wang, and Liang He. 2024. Med- Bench: A large-scale Chinese benchmark for evaluat- ing medical large language models. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 17709-17717.
- Tianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, and Danqi Chen. 2021. SimCSE: Simple contrastive learning of sentence em- beddings. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing, pages 6894-6910, Online and Punta Cana, Do- minican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Di Jin, Eileen Pan, Nassim Oufattole, Wei-Hung Weng, Hanyi Fang, and Peter Szolovits. 2021. What disease does this patient have? A large-scale open domain question answering dataset from medical exams. Ap- plied Sciences, 11(14):6421.
- Qiao Jin, Bhuwan Dhingra, Zhengping Liu, William Cohen, and Xinghua Lu. 2019. PubMedQA: A dataset for biomedical research question answering. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Lan- guage Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 2567- 2577, Hong Kong, China. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Maurice Kendall. 1938. A new measure of rank correla- tion. Biometrika, 30(1-2):81-93.
- Dongfang Li, Baotian Hu, Qingcai Chen, Weihua Peng, and Anqi Wang. 2020. Towards medical machine reading comprehension with structural knowledge and plain text. In Proceedings of the 2020 Confer- ence on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 1427-1438, Online. As- sociation for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Jing Li, Shangping Zhong, and Kaizhi Chen. 2021. MLEC-QA: A chinese multi-choice biomedical ques- tion answering dataset. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Lan- guage Processing, pages 8862-8874.
- Chin-Yew Lin. 2004. Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text summarization branches out, pages 74-81.
- Junling Liu, Peilin Zhou, Yining Hua, Dading Chong, Zhongyu Tian, Andrew Liu, Helin Wang, Chenyu You, Zhenhua Guo, Lei Zhu, et al. 2024. Bench- marking large language models on cmexam-a com- prehensive chinese medical exam dataset. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36.
- Amarachi B Mbakwe, Ismini Lourentzou, Leo An- thony Celi, Oren J Mechanic, and Alon Dagan. 2023. ChatGPT passing USMLE shines a spotlight on the flaws of medical education. PLOS digital health, 2(2):e0000205.
- Ankit Pal, Logesh Kumar Umapathi, and Malaikan- nan Sankarasubbu. 2022. Medmcqa: A large-scale multi-subject multi-choice dataset for medical do- main question answering. In Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning, pages 248-260.
- PMLR.
- Anusri Pampari, Preethi Raghavan, Jennifer Liang, and Jian Peng. 2018. emrQA: A large corpus for question answering on electronic medical records. In Proceed- ings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2357-2368, Brussels, Belgium. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Karan Singhal, Shekoofeh Azizi, Tao Tu, S Sara Mah- davi, Jason Wei, Hyung Won Chung, Nathan Scales, Ajay Tanwani, Heather Cole-Lewis, Stephen Pfohl, et al. 2023. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature, 620(7972):172-180.
- Xidong Wang, Guiming Chen, Song Dingjie, Zhang Zhiyi, Zhihong Chen, Qingying Xiao, Junying Chen, Feng Jiang, Jianquan Li, Xiang Wan, Benyou Wang, and Haizhou Li. 2024. CMB: A comprehensive med- ical benchmark in Chinese. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Hu- man Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Pa- pers), pages 6184-6205, Mexico City, Mexico. Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Aohan Zeng, Xiao Liu, Zhengxiao Du, Zihan Wang, Hanyu Lai, Ming Ding, Zhuoyi Yang, Yifan Xu, Wendi Zheng, Xiao Xia, et al. 2023. GLM-130B: An open bilingual pre-trained model. ICLR 2023.
- Hongbo Zhang, Junying Chen, Feng Jiang, Fei Yu, Zhihong Chen, Guiming Chen, Jianquan Li, Xi- angbo Wu, Zhang Zhiyi, Qingying Xiao, Xiang Wan, Benyou Wang, and Haizhou Li. 2023. HuatuoGPT, towards taming language model to be a doctor. In Findings of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics: EMNLP 2023, pages 10859-10885, Singa- pore. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Yan Zhuang, Qi Liu, Yuting Ning, Weizhe Huang, Rui Lv, Zhenya Huang, Guanhao Zhao, Zheng Zhang, Qingyang Mao, Shijin Wang, et al. 2023. Ef- ficiently measuring the cognitive ability of llms: An adaptive testing perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.10512. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Holistic evaluation of large language models for medical tasks with MedHELM
Bedi, S., Cui, H., Fuentes, M., Unell, A., Wornow, M., Banda, J. M., Kotecha, N., Keyes, T., Mai, Y., Oez, M., et al. (2026) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-025-04151-2 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
LiveMedBench: A Contamination-Limited Medical Benchmark for LLMs with Automated Rubric Evaluation
Yan, Z., Song, D., Fang, Z., Ji, Y., Li, X., Li, Q., & Sun, L. (2026) · Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2 · doi:10.1145/3770855.3817579
- Authors
- Ouyang, Z., Qiu, Y., Wang, L., De Melo, G., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & He, L.
- Affiliations
- East China Normal University (CN)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 8428-8438
- OpenAlex
- W4404783184
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- medical large language models, benchmark evaluation, clinical reasoning, factual consistency, medical reports, diagnostic accuracy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review