Cited by 8Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsTopic ModelingInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

M3SciQA: A Multi-Modal Multi-Document Scientific QA Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models

Open access
Li, Chuhan, Shangguan, Ziyao, Zhao, Yilun, Li, Deyuan, Liu, Yixin, Cohan, Arman·2024·Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024

Abstract

Existing evaluation benchmarks for foundation models in understanding scientific literature predominantly focus on single-document, text-only tasks.Such benchmarks often do not adequately represent the complexity of research workflows, which typically also involve interpreting non-textual data, such as figures and tables, and gathering information across multiple documents and related literature.To address this gap, we introduce M3SCIQA, a multi-modal, multi-document scientific question answering benchmark designed for a more comprehensive evaluation of foundation models.M3SCIQA consists of 1,452 expertannotated questions spanning 70 natural language processing paper clusters, where each cluster represents a primary paper along with all its cited documents, mirroring the workflow of comprehending a single paper by requiring multi-modal and multi-document data.With M3SCIQA, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of 18 frontier foundation models.Our results indicate that current foundation models still significantly underperform compared to human experts in multi-modal information retrieval and in reasoning across multiple scientific documents.Additionally, we explore the implications of these findings for the future advancement of applying foundation models in multi-modal scientific literature analysis."The results presented in the Information Value paper are intriguing.The figure clearly indicates that the DialoGPT family of models exhibits the most negative Spearman's Correlation Coefficient compared to all other models." 1 Reading an anchor paper Locality-Specific Question: "Which model exhibits the most negative Spearman's Correlation Coefficient?"Locality-Specific Reasoning: DialoGPT Large exhibits the most negative Spearman's Correlation Coefficient.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.904

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multi-document and multimodal scientific reasoning benchmarks report substantial gaps between current systems and expert performance when evidence must be integrated across papers or modalities.

    “Multi-document and multimodal scientific reasoning benchmarks further report substantial gaps between current systems and expert performance when evidence must be integrated across papers or modalities [31][32][33].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. AI, :, Alex Young, Bei Chen, Chao Li, Chen- gen Huang, Ge Zhang, Guanwei Zhang, Heng Li, Jiangcheng Zhu, Jianqun Chen, Jing Chang, Kaidong Yu, Peng Liu, Qiang Liu, Shawn Yue, Senbin Yang, Shiming Yang, Tao Yu, Wen Xie, Wenhao Huang, Xiaohui Hu, Xiaoyi Ren, Xinyao Niu, Pengcheng Nie, Yuchi Xu, Yudong Liu, Yue Wang, Yuxuan Cai, Zhenyu Gu, Zhiyuan Liu, and Zonghong Dai. 2024. Yi: Open foundation models by 01.ai. Preprint, arXiv:2403.04652. · arXiv
  2. Dehghani, Sunipa Dev, Jacob Devlin, Mark Díaz, Nan Du, Ethan Dyer, Vlad Feinberg, Fangxiaoyu Feng, Vlad Fienber, Markus Freitag, Xavier Gar- cia, Sebastian Gehrmann, Lucas Gonzalez, Guy Gur- Ari, Steven Hand, Hadi Hashemi, Le Hou, Joshua Howland, Andrea Hu, Jeffrey Hui, Jeremy Hur- witz, Michael Isard, Abe Ittycheriah, Matthew Jagiel- ski, Wenhao Jia, Kathleen Kenealy, Maxim Krikun, Sneha Kudugunta, Chang Lan, Katherine Lee, Ben- jamin Lee, Eric Li, Music Li, Wei Li, YaGuang Li, Jian Li, Hyeontaek Lim, Hanzhao Lin, Zhongtao Liu, Frederick Liu, Marcello Maggioni, Aroma Mahendru, Joshua Maynez, Vedant Misra, Maysam Moussalem, Zachary Nado, John Nham, Eric Ni, Andrew Nys- trom, Alicia Parrish, Marie Pellat, Martin Polacek, Alex Polozov, Reiner Pope, Siyuan Qiao, Emily Reif, Bryan Richter, Parker Riley, Alex Castro Ros, Au- rko Roy, Brennan Saeta, Rajkumar Samuel, Renee Shelby, Ambrose Slone, Daniel Smilkov, David R. So, Daniel Sohn, Simon Tokumine, Dasha Valter, Vijay Vasudevan, Kiran Vodrahalli, Xuezhi Wang, Pidong Wang, Zirui Wang, Tao Wang, John Wiet- ing, Yuhuai Wu, Kelvin Xu, Yunhan Xu, Linting Xue, Pengcheng Yin, Jiahui Yu, Qiao Zhang, Steven Zheng, Ce Zheng, Weikang Zhou, Denny Zhou, Slav Petrov, and Yonghui Wu. 2023. Palm 2 technical report. Preprint, arXiv:2305.10403. · arXiv
  3. Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Shusheng Yang, Shijie Wang, Sinan Tan, Peng Wang, Junyang Lin, Chang Zhou, and Jingren Zhou. 2023. Qwen-vl: A versatile vision- language model for understanding, localization, text reading, and beyond. Preprint, arXiv:2308.12966. · arXiv
  4. Payal Bajaj, Daniel Campos, Nick Craswell, Li Deng, Jianfeng Gao, Xiaodong Liu, Rangan Majumder, Andrew McNamara, Bhaskar Mitra, Tri Nguyen, Mir Rosenberg, Xia Song, Alina Stoica, Saurabh Tiwary, and Tong Wang. 2018. Ms marco: A human generated machine reading comprehension dataset. Preprint, arXiv:1611.09268. · arXiv
  5. Yingshan Chang, Mridu Narang, Hisami Suzuki, Gui- hong Cao, Jianfeng Gao, and Yonatan Bisk. 2022. Webqa: Multihop and multimodal qa. Preprint, arXiv:2109.00590. · arXiv
  6. Jiaqi Chen, Jianheng Tang, Jinghui Qin, Xiaodan Liang, Lingbo Liu, Eric P. Xing, and Liang Lin. 2022. Geoqa: A geometric question answering benchmark towards multimodal numerical reasoning. Preprint, arXiv:2105.14517. · arXiv
  7. Pradeep Dasigi, Kyle Lo, Iz Beltagy, Arman Cohan, Noah A. Smith, and Matt Gardner. 2021. A dataset of information-seeking questions and answers an- chored in research papers. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Hu- man Language Technologies, pages 4599-4610, On- line. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  8. Yann Dubois, Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang, Ishaan Gulrajani, Jimmy Ba, Carlos Guestrin, Percy Liang, and Tatsunori B. Hashimoto. 2024. Alpaca- farm: A simulation framework for methods that learn from human feedback. Preprint, arXiv:2305.14387. · arXiv
  9. Mario Giulianelli, Sarenne Wallbridge, and Raquel Fer- nández. 2023. Information value: Measuring utter- ance predictability as distance from plausible alterna- tives. Preprint, arXiv:2310.13676. · arXiv
  10. Tanya Goyal, Junyi Jessy Li, and Greg Durrett. 2023. News summarization and evaluation in the era of gpt-3. Preprint, arXiv:2209.12356. · arXiv
  11. Albert Q. Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Antoine Roux, Arthur Mensch, Blanche Savary, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Emma Bou Hanna, Florian Bressand, Gi- anna Lengyel, Guillaume Bour, Guillaume Lam- ple, Lélio Renard Lavaud, Lucile Saulnier, Marie- Anne Lachaux, Pierre Stock, Sandeep Subramanian, Sophia Yang, Szymon Antoniak, Teven Le Scao, Théophile Gervet, Thibaut Lavril, Thomas Wang, Timothée Lacroix, and William El Sayed. 2024. Mix- tral of experts. Preprint, arXiv:2401.04088. · arXiv
  12. Yoonjoo Lee, Kyungjae Lee, Sunghyun Park, Dasol Hwang, Jaehyeon Kim, Hong-In Lee, and Moontae Lee. 2023. QASA: Advanced question answering on scientific articles. In Proceedings of the 40th Inter- national Conference on Machine Learning, volume 202 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 19036-19052.
  13. PMLR.
  14. Bohao Li, Rui Wang, Guangzhi Wang, Yuying Ge, Yix- iao Ge, and Ying Shan. 2023. Seed-bench: Bench- marking multimodal llms with generative compre- hension. Preprint, arXiv:2307.16125. · arXiv
  15. Lei Li, Yuqi Wang, Runxin Xu, Peiyi Wang, Xiachong Feng, Lingpeng Kong, and Qi Liu. 2024. Multimodal arxiv: A dataset for improving scientific compre- hension of large vision-language models. Preprint, arXiv:2403.00231. · arXiv
  16. Chin-Yew Lin. 2004. ROUGE: A package for auto- matic evaluation of summaries. In Text Summariza- tion Branches Out, pages 74-81, Barcelona, Spain. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  17. Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, Lubomir Bourdev, Ross Girshick, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, C. Lawrence Zitnick, and Piotr Dol- lár. 2015. Microsoft coco: Common objects in con- text. Preprint, arXiv:1405.0312. · arXiv
  18. Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, and Yong Jae Lee. 2024. Improved baselines with visual instruc- tion tuning. Preprint, arXiv:2310.03744. · arXiv
  19. Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. 2023a. Visual instruction tuning. Preprint, arXiv:2304.08485. · arXiv
  20. Yixin Liu, Alexander Fabbri, Yilun Zhao, Pengfei Liu, Shafiq Joty, Chien-Sheng Wu, Caiming Xiong, and Dragomir Radev. 2023b. Towards interpretable and efficient automatic reference-based summarization evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing, pages 16360-16368, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  21. Yixin Liu, Alexander R. Fabbri, Jiawen Chen, Yilun Zhao, Simeng Han, Shafiq Joty, Pengfei Liu, Dragomir Radev, Chien-Sheng Wu, and Arman Co- han. 2023c. Benchmarking generation and eval- uation capabilities of large language models for instruction controllable summarization. Preprint, arXiv:2311.09184. · arXiv
  22. Yuan Liu, Haodong Duan, Yuanhan Zhang, Bo Li, Songyang Zhang, Wangbo Zhao, Yike Yuan, Jiaqi Wang, Conghui He, Ziwei Liu, Kai Chen, and Dahua Lin. 2023d. Mmbench: Is your multi-modal model an all-around player? Preprint, arXiv:2307.06281. · arXiv
  23. Haoyu Lu, Wen Liu, Bo Zhang, Bingxuan Wang, Kai Dong, Bo Liu, Jingxiang Sun, Tongzheng Ren, Zhu- oshu Li, Hao Yang, Yaofeng Sun, Chengqi Deng, Hanwei Xu, Zhenda Xie, and Chong Ruan. 2024a. Deepseek-vl: Towards real-world vision-language understanding. Preprint, arXiv:2403.05525. · arXiv
  24. Pan Lu, Hritik Bansal, Tony Xia, Jiacheng Liu, Chun- yuan Li, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Hao Cheng, Kai-Wei Chang, Michel Galley, and Jianfeng Gao. 2024b. Mathvista: Evaluating mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. In Inter- national Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
  25. Pan Lu, Swaroop Mishra, Tony Xia, Liang Qiu, Kai- Wei Chang, Song-Chun Zhu, Oyvind Tafjord, Peter Clark, and Ashwin Kalyan. 2022. Learn to explain: Multimodal reasoning via thought chains for science question answering. In The 36th Conference on Neu- ral Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS).
  26. Ahmed Masry, Do Xuan Long, Jia Qing Tan, Shafiq Joty, and Enamul Hoque. 2022. Chartqa: A benchmark for question answering about charts with visual and logical reasoning. Preprint, arXiv:2203.10244. · arXiv
  27. Benjamin Newman, Luca Soldaini, Raymond Fok, Ar- man Cohan, and Kyle Lo. 2023. A question answer- ing framework for decontextualizing user-facing snip- pets from scientific documents. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 3194-3212, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  28. OpenAI. 2022. Introducing chatgpt. OpenAI. 2024a. Gpt-4 technical report. Preprint, arXiv:2303.08774. · arXiv
  29. Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sas- try, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, Gretchen Krueger, and Ilya Sutskever. 2021. Learn- ing transferable visual models from natural language supervision. Preprint, arXiv:2103.00020. · arXiv
  30. Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. 2016. Squad: 100,000+ ques- tions for machine comprehension of text. Preprint, arXiv:1606.05250. · arXiv
  31. Alon Talmor, Ori Yoran, Amnon Catav, Dan Lahav, Yizhong Wang, Akari Asai, Gabriel Ilharco, Han- naneh Hajishirzi, and Jonathan Berant. 2021. Mul- timodalqa: Complex question answering over text, tables and images. Preprint, arXiv:2104.06039. · arXiv
  32. Gemini Team. 2023. Gemini: A family of highly capa- ble multimodal models. Preprint, arXiv:2312.11805. · arXiv
  33. Zirui Wang, Mengzhou Xia, Luxi He, Howard Chen, Yitao Liu, Richard Zhu, Kaiqu Liang, Xindi Wu, Hao- tian Liu, Sadhika Malladi, Alexis Chevalier, Sanjeev Arora, and Danqi Chen. 2024. Charxiv: Charting gaps in realistic chart understanding in multimodal llms. Preprint, arXiv:2406.18521. · arXiv
  34. Siwei Wu, Yizhi Li, Kang Zhu, Ge Zhang, Yiming Liang, Kaijing Ma, Chenghao Xiao, Haoran Zhang, Bohao Yang, Wenhu Chen, Wenhao Huang, Noura Al Moubayed, Jie Fu, and Chenghua Lin. 2024. Scim- mir: Benchmarking scientific multi-modal informa- tion retrieval. Preprint, arXiv:2401.13478. · arXiv
  35. Fangyuan Xu, Kyle Lo, Luca Soldaini, Bailey Kuehl, Eunsol Choi, and David Wadden. 2024. Kiwi: A dataset of knowledge-intensive writing instruc- tions for answering research questions. Preprint, arXiv:2403.03866. · arXiv
  36. Semih Yagcioglu, Aykut Erdem, Erkut Erdem, and Na- zli Ikizler-Cinbis. 2018. RecipeQA: A challenge dataset for multimodal comprehension of cooking recipes. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1358-1368, Brussels, Belgium. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  37. Zhilin Yang, Peng Qi, Saizheng Zhang, Yoshua Ben- gio, William W. Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Christopher D. Manning. 2018. Hotpotqa: A dataset for diverse, explainable multi-hop question answer- ing. Preprint, arXiv:1809.09600. · arXiv
  38. Weihao Yu, Zhengyuan Yang, Linjie Li, Jianfeng Wang, Kevin Lin, Zicheng Liu, Xinchao Wang, and Li- juan Wang. 2023. Mm-vet: Evaluating large mul- timodal models for integrated capabilities. Preprint, arXiv:2308.02490. · arXiv
  39. Xiang Yue, Yuansheng Ni, Kai Zhang, Tianyu Zheng, Ruoqi Liu, Ge Zhang, Samuel Stevens, Dongfu Jiang, Weiming Ren, Yuxuan Sun, Cong Wei, Botao Yu, Ruibin Yuan, Renliang Sun, Ming Yin, Boyuan Zheng, Zhenzhu Yang, Yibo Liu, Wenhao Huang, Huan Sun, Yu Su, and Wenhu Chen. 2023. Mmmu: A massive multi-discipline multimodal understand- ing and reasoning benchmark for expert agi. Preprint, arXiv:2311.16502. · arXiv
  40. Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. 2020a. Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with bert. Preprint, arXiv:1904.09675. · arXiv
  41. Wenqi Zhang, Zhenglin Cheng, Yuanyu He, Mengna Wang, Yongliang Shen, Zeqi Tan, Guiyang Hou, Mingqian He, Yanna Ma, Weiming Lu, and Yueting Zhuang. 2024. Multimodal self-instruct: Synthetic abstract image and visual reasoning instruction using language model. Preprint, arXiv:2407.07053. · arXiv
  42. Yizhe Zhang, Siqi Sun, Michel Galley, Yen-Chun Chen, Chris Brockett, Xiang Gao, Jianfeng Gao, Jingjing Liu, and Bill Dolan. 2020b. Dialogpt: Large-scale generative pre-training for conversational response generation. Preprint, arXiv:1911.00536. · arXiv
  43. Yilun Zhao, Yitao Long, Hongjun Liu, Ryo Kamoi, Linyong Nan, Lyuhao Chen, Yixin Liu, Xian- gru Tang, Rui Zhang, and Arman Cohan. 2024. DocMath-eval: Evaluating math reasoning capabili- ties of LLMs in understanding long and specialized documents. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguis- tics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 16103-16120, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, C., Shangguan, Z., Zhao, Y., Li, D., Liu, Y., & Cohan, A.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024
Published
2024
Pages
15419-15446
OpenAlex
W4404781475
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Microsoft Research
  • Tata Consultancy Services
  • Tata Sons
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
scientific question answering, benchmark, citation networks, tables and figures, DialoGPT

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review