Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6Digital Humanities and ScholarshipNatural Language Processing TechniquesHandwritten Text Recognition Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Historical Ink: 19th Century Latin American Spanish Newspaper Corpus with LLM OCR Correction

Open access
Manrique-Gomez, Laura, Montes, Tony, Rodriguez Herrera, Arturo, Manrique, Ruben·2024·Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Natural Language Processing for Digital Humanities

Abstract

This paper presents two significant contributions: First, it introduces a novel dataset of 19thcentury Latin American newspaper texts, addressing a critical gap in specialized corpora for historical and linguistic analysis in this region.Second, it develops a flexible framework that utilizes a Large Language Model for OCR error correction and linguistic surface form detection in digitized corpora.This semi-automated framework is adaptable to various contexts and datasets and is applied to the newly created dataset.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2024.nlp4dh-1.13

Cites

0 citation errors · 5 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. David M. Berry and Anders Fagerjord. 2017. Digital Humanities: Knowledge and critique in a Digital age. Polity Press.
  2. Miriam Bouzouita and Mara Fuertes Gutiérrez. 2015. Spanish studies: Language and linguistics. The Year's Work in Modern Language Studies, 75:171- 185. · DOI
  3. José Cañete, Gabriel Chaperon, Rodrigo Fuentes, Jou- Hui Ho, Hojin Kang, and Jorge Pérez. 2020. Spanish pre-trained BERT model and evaluation data. In PML4DC at ICLR 2020.
  4. Guillaume Chiron, Antoine Doucet, Mickaël Coustaty, and Jean-Philippe Moreux. 2017. Icdar2017 competi- tion on post-OCR text correction. In 2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), volume 01, pages 1423-1428. · DOI
  5. James E. Dobson. 2019. Critical Digital Humanities: The search for a methodology. University of Illinois Press.
  6. Zoe LeBlanc. 2024. More than keywords. The Ameri- can Historical Review, 129(1):164-168. · DOI
  7. Daniel Lopresti. 2008. Optical character recognition er- rors and their effects on natural language processing. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Analytics for Noisy Unstructured Text Data, page 9-16. Asso- ciation for Computing Machinery. · DOI
  8. Thomas Montgomery. 1966. On the development of spanish y from "et". Romance Notes, 8(1):137-142.
  9. Kengatharaiyer Sarveswaran, Gihan Dias, and Miriam Butt. 2019. Using meta-morph rules to develop mor- phological analysers: A case study concerning Tamil. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Finite-State Methods and Natural Language Pro- cessing, pages 76-86, Dresden, Germany. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  10. Elizabeth Soper, Stanley Fujimoto, and Yen-Yun Yu. 2021a. BART for post-correction of OCR newspa- per text. In Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT 2021), pages 284-290, Online. Association for Computational Lin- guistics. · DOI
  11. Elizabeth Soper, Stanley Fujimoto, and Yen-Yun Yu. 2021b. BART for post-correction of OCR newspa- per text. In Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT 2021), pages 284-290, Online. Association for Computational Lin- guistics. · DOI

Cited by

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Manrique-Gomez, L., Montes, T., Rodriguez Herrera, A., & Manrique, R.
Affiliations
Universidad de Los Andes (CO)
Venue
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Natural Language Processing for Digital Humanities
Published
2024
Pages
132-139
OpenAlex
W4404781013
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
36.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Conference on Natural Language Processing for Digital Humanities (NLP4DH) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Keywords
historical newspapers, newspaper corpus, OCR error correction, large language models, historical linguistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Historical Ink: 19th Century Latin American Spanish Newspaper Corpus with LLM OCR Correction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18653/v1/2024.nlp4dh-1.13
The paper
Manrique-Gomez, L., Montes, T., Rodriguez Herrera, A., & Manrique, R. (2024). Historical Ink: 19th Century Latin American Spanish Newspaper Corpus with LLM OCR Correction. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Natural Language Processing for Digital Humanities. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.nlp4dh-1.13

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.