The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AMAS: Adaptively Determining Communication Topology for LLM-based Multi-agent System
Abstract
Although large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing capabilities, their practical implementation as autonomous multi-agent systems (MAS) for industrial problem-solving encounters persistent barriers.Conventional MAS architectures are fundamentally restricted by inflexible, handcrafted graph topologies that lack contextual responsiveness, resulting in diminished efficacy across varied academic and commercial workloads.To surmount these constraints, we introduce AMAS, a paradigm-shifting framework that redefines LLM-based MAS through a novel dynamic graph selector.This component autonomously identifies task-specific optimal graph configurations via lightweight LLM adaptation, eliminating the reliance on monolithic, universally applied structural templates.Instead, AMAS exploits the intrinsic properties of individual inputs to intelligently direct query trajectories through task-optimized agent pathways.Rigorous validation across question answering, mathematical deduction, and code generation benchmarks confirms that AMAS systematically exceeds state-of-the-art singleagent and multi-agent approaches across diverse LLM architectures.Our investigation establishes that context-sensitive structural adaptability constitutes a foundational requirement for high-performance LLM MAS deployments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
Hu, E. J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., & Chen, W. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.09685 · Cited by 13,453
Self-citationA Survey of Large Language Models
Zhao, W. X., Zhou, K., Li, J., Tang, T., Dong, Z., Hou, Y., Zhang, B., Min, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, P., et al. (2026) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-026-60308-3 · Cited by 2,093
Self-citationSelf-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions
Wang, Y., Kordi, Y., Mishra, S., Liu, A., Smith, N. A., Khashabi, D., & Hajishirzi, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.754 · Cited by 1,243
ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models
Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K., & Cao, Y. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.03629 · Cited by 608
CMMLU: Measuring massive multitask language understanding in Chinese
Li, H., Zhang, Y., Koto, F., Yang, Y., Zhao, H., Gong, Y., Duan, N., & Baldwin, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.09212 · Cited by 464
Auto-GPT for Online Decision Making: Benchmarks and Additional Opinions
Yang, H., Yue, S., & He, Y. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.02224 · Cited by 44
Cited by
Self-Improvement of Large Language Models: A Technical Overview and Future Outlook
Yang, H., Xerri, M., Park, S., Zhang, H., Feng, Y., Kogilathota, S. A., & Zhou, J. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.25681
Metadata
- Authors
- Leong, H. Y., Li, Y., Wu, Y., Ouyang, W., Zhu, W., Gao, J., & Han, W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Industry Track
- Published
- 2025
- Pages
- 2061-2070
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 6
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AMAS: Adaptively Determining Communication Topology for LLM-based Multi-agent System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-industry.144
- The paper
- Leong, H. Y., Li, Y., Wu, Y., Ouyang, W., Zhu, W., Gao, J., & Han, W. (2025). AMAS: Adaptively Determining Communication Topology for LLM-based Multi-agent System. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Industry Track. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-industry.144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.