The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
A Unified Framework for N-ary Property Information Extraction in Materials Science
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a unified framework for extracting n-ary property information from materials science literature, addressing the critical challenge of capturing complex relationships that often span multiple sentences.We introduce three complementary approaches: RE-Composition, which transforms binary relations into n-ary structures; Direct EAE, which models polymer properties as events with multiple arguments; and LLM-Guided Assembly, which leverages highconfidence entity and relation outputs to guide structured extraction.Our framework is built upon two novel resources: MatSciNERE, a comprehensive corpus for materials science entities and relations, and PolyEE, a specialized corpus for polymer property events.Through strategic synthetic data generation for both NER and EAE tasks, we achieve significant performance improvements (up to 5.34 F1 points).Experiments demonstrate that our combined approaches outperform any single method, with the LLM-guided approach achieving the highest F1 score (71.53%).The framework enables more comprehensive knowledge extraction from scientific literature, supporting materials discovery and database curation applications.We plan to release our resources and trained models to the research community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Metadata
- Authors
- Phi, V.-T., & Matsumoto, Y.
- ORCID
- Phi, Van-Thuy
- Venue
- Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025
- Published
- 2025
- Pages
- 2369-2388
- OpenAlex
- W4416035863
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Keywords
- materials science literature, synthetic data generation, polymer properties, entity relation extraction, materials discovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review