Cited by 11Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningTopic ModelingNatural Language Processing Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From Allies to Adversaries: Manipulating LLM Tool-Calling through Adversarial Injection

Open access
Zhang, Rupeng, Wang, Haowei, Wang, Junjie, Li, Mingyang, Huang, Yuekai, Wang, Dandan, Wang, Qing·2025·Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

Rupeng Zhang, Haowei Wang, Junjie Wang, Mingyang Li, Yuekai Huang, Dandan Wang, Qing Wang. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.101

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774. · arXiv
  2. Gabriel Alon and Michael Kamfonas. 2023. Detect- ing language model attacks with perplexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14132. · arXiv
  3. Patrick Chao, Alexander Robey, Edgar Dobriban, Hamed Hassani, George J Pappas, and Eric Wong. 2023. Jailbreaking black box large language models in twenty queries. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08419. · arXiv
  4. Harsh Chaudhari, Giorgio Severi, John Abascal, Matthew Jagielski, Christopher A Choquette-Choo, Milad Nasr, Cristina Nita-Rotaru, and Alina Oprea. 2024. Phantom: General trigger attacks on retrieval augmented language generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20485. · arXiv
  5. Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Amy Yang, Angela Fan, et al. 2024. The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783. · arXiv
  6. Javid Ebrahimi, Anyi Rao, Daniel Lowd, and De- jing Dou. 2017. Hotflip: White-box adversarial examples for text classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.06751. · arXiv
  7. Shen Gao, Zhengliang Shi, Minghang Zhu, Bowen Fang, Xin Xin, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Jun Ma, and Zhaochun Ren. 2024. Confucius: Iterative tool learn- ing from introspection feedback by easy-to-difficult curriculum. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 18030- 18038.
  8. Yunfan Gao, Yun Xiong, Xinyu Gao, Kangxiang Jia, Jinliu Pan, Yuxi Bi, Yi Dai, Jiawei Sun, and Haofen Wang. 2023. Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10997. · arXiv
  9. Kai Greshake, Sahar Abdelnabi, Shailesh Mishra, Christoph Endres, Thorsten Holz, and Mario Fritz. 2023. Not what you've signed up for: Compromis- ing real-world llm-integrated applications with indi- rect prompt injection. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Secu- rity, pages 79-90.
  10. Gautier Izacard, Mathilde Caron, Lucas Hosseini, Se- bastian Riedel, Piotr Bojanowski, Armand Joulin, and Edouard Grave. 2021. Unsupervised dense in- formation retrieval with contrastive learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09118. · arXiv
  11. Prithwish Jana, Piyush Jha, Haoyang Ju, Gautham Kishore, Aryan Mahajan, and Vijay Ganesh. 2023. Cotran: An llm-based code translator using reinforce- ment learning with feedback from compiler and sym- bolic execution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.06755. · arXiv
  12. Huayang Li, Yixuan Su, Deng Cai, Yan Wang, and Lemao Liu. 2022. A survey on retrieval-augmented text generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.01110. · arXiv
  13. Yi Liu, Gelei Deng, Yuekang Li, Kailong Wang, Zihao Wang, Xiaofeng Wang, Tianwei Zhang, Yepang Liu, Haoyu Wang, Yan Zheng, et al. 2023. Prompt injec- tion attack against llm-integrated applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05499. · arXiv
  14. Reiichiro Nakano, Jacob Hilton, Suchir Balaji, Jeff Wu, Long Ouyang, Christina Kim, Christopher Hesse, Shantanu Jain, Vineet Kosaraju, William Saunders, et al. 2021. Webgpt: Browser-assisted question- answering with human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09332. · arXiv
  15. Yujia Qin, Shihao Liang, Yining Ye, Kunlun Zhu, Lan Yan, Yaxi Lu, Yankai Lin, Xin Cong, Xiangru Tang, Bill Qian, et al. 2023. Toolllm: Facilitating large language models to master 16000+ real-world apis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.16789. · arXiv
  16. Alexander Robey, Eric Wong, Hamed Hassani, and George J Pappas. 2023. Smoothllm: Defending large language models against jailbreaking attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03684. · arXiv
  17. Yongliang Shen, Kaitao Song, Xu Tan, Dongsheng Li, Weiming Lu, and Yueting Zhuang. 2024. Hugging- gpt: Solving ai tasks with chatgpt and its friends in hugging face. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36.
  18. Qiaoyu Tang, Ziliang Deng, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Qiao Liang, Boxi Cao, and Le Sun. 2023. Toolalpaca: Generalized tool learning for language models with 3000 simulated cases. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05301. · arXiv
  19. An Yang, Baosong Yang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Zhou, Chengpeng Li, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, et al. 2024. Qwen2 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10671. · arXiv
  20. Junjie Ye, Sixian Li, Guanyu Li, Caishuang Huang, Songyang Gao, Yilong Wu, Qi Zhang, Tao Gui, and Xuanjing Huang. 2024. Toolsword: Un- veiling safety issues of large language models in tool learning across three stages. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10753. · arXiv
  21. Jiahao Yu, Xingwei Lin, Zheng Yu, and Xinyu Xing. 2023. Gptfuzzer: Red teaming large language mod- els with auto-generated jailbreak prompts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.10253. · arXiv
  22. Xiaodong Yu, Hao Cheng, Xiaodong Liu, Dan Roth, and Jianfeng Gao. 2024. Reeval: Automatic hal- lucination evaluation for retrieval-augmented large language models via transferable adversarial attacks. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024, pages 1333-1351.
  23. Xiaohan Yuan, Jinfeng Li, Dongxia Wang, Yuefeng Chen, Xiaofeng Mao, Longtao Huang, Hui Xue, Wen- hai Wang, Kui Ren, and Jingyi Wang. 2024. S-eval: Automatic and adaptive test generation for bench- marking safety evaluation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14191. · arXiv
  24. Yuyue Zhao, Jiancan Wu, Xiang Wang, Wei Tang, Dingxian Wang, and Maarten de Rijke. 2024. Let me do it for you: Towards llm empowered recom- mendation via tool learning. In Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Re- search and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 1796-1806.
  25. Sicheng Zhu, Ruiyi Zhang, Bang An, Gang Wu, Joe Barrow, Zichao Wang, Furong Huang, Ani Nenkova, and Tong Sun. 2023. Autodan: Automatic and inter- pretable adversarial attacks on large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.15140. · arXiv
  26. Andy Zou, Zifan Wang, Nicholas Carlini, Milad Nasr, J Zico Kolter, and Matt Fredrikson. 2023. Univer- sal and transferable adversarial attacks on aligned language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15043. · arXiv
  27. Wei Zou, Runpeng Geng, Binghui Wang, and Jinyuan Jia. 2024. Poisonedrag: Knowledge poisoning at- tacks to retrieval-augmented generation of large lan- guage models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.07867. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • MemMorph: Tool Hijacking in LLM Agents via Memory Poisoning

    Zhang, X., Zheng, Y., Xu, Z., Zhou, K., Shen, B., Ou, H., Zhang, T., & Lam, K.-Y. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.26154

    “Unfortunately, recent work (Shi et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2025; Lin et al., 2026) shows that existing tool selection mechanisms are vulnerable: an attacker can easily manipulate the agent’s tool choice by injecting adversarial content into the metadata, thereby compromising the tool retrieval and…”

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, R., Wang, H., Wang, J., Li, M., Huang, Y., Wang, D., & Wang, Q.
Venue
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2025
Pages
2009-2028
OpenAlex
W4411119537
Cited by
11
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3
FWCI
7.68
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (202304, 2024YFF0618800, 62232016)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFF0618800)
  • Youth Innovation Promotion Association
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
large language models, tool calling, adversarial attacks, prompt manipulation, LLM security, adversarial examples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review